Chan Wayne W, Brolin Tyler J, Thakar Ocean, Patel Manan S, Sholder Daniel S, Abboud Joseph A, Getz Charles L
UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA.
Campbell Clinic Orthopaedics, Memphis, TN, USA.
JSES Int. 2020 Sep 17;4(4):792-796. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.006. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation in patients aged ≥ 40 years is not as rare as once thought. The mechanism of instability in this patient population is different-more likely to be attributed to rotator cuff pathology-compared with that in younger individuals. With an increasingly aging active population, surgical management has a rising role in preventing morbidity associated with recurrent instability. Our purpose was to evaluate outcomes of anterior shoulder instability repair (ie, Bankart or bony Bankart repair) with and without rotator cuff repair (RCR) in patients aged ≥ 40 years.
We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients aged ≥ 40 years who underwent surgical repair for anterior shoulder instability from 2008-2016. Patients were categorized into 4 cohorts: Bankart repair only, bony Bankart repair only, Bankart repair with concomitant RCR, and bony Bankart repair with concomitant RCR. Demographic and history-of-instability data were collected. Clinical and functional outcomes assessed included the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Penn Shoulder Score, visual analog scale score for pain, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score, and patient satisfaction score.
A total of 146 patients were included in this study, with 103 patients (71%) having ≥2-year outcome scores. Outcome scores were not significantly different among groups. For patients who underwent Bankart repair only, bony Bankart repair only, Bankart repair with RCR, and bony Bankart repair with RCR, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores were 80.8 ± 19.7, 90.0 ± 10.7, 79.3 ± 29.4, and 87.2 ± 10.6, respectively ( = .284); American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, 83.8 ± 19.7, 92.4 ± 17.4, 82.5 ± 25.6, and 85.6 ± 12.7, respectively ( = .114); Penn Shoulder Scores for function, 84.5 ± 17.9, 90.9 ± 15.3, 83.6 ± 25.1, and 95.7 ± 13.0, respectively ( = .286); and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores, 481.0 ± 519.5, 292.1 ± 414.3, 548.9 ± 690.5, and 320.6 ± 258.7, respectively ( = .713). Age at the time of surgery significantly differed between cohorts ( < .001). No patients had recurrence of instability during the study period.
Similar functional outcomes can be achieved in the surgical management of anterior instability in patients aged ≥ 40 years. Rotator cuff tears should be suspected and repaired in patients with anterior instability, especially those aged ≥ 50 years.
40岁及以上患者复发性前肩脱位并不像曾经认为的那样罕见。与年轻个体相比,该患者群体的不稳定机制有所不同,更可能归因于肩袖病变。随着活跃人群日益老龄化,手术治疗在预防复发性不稳定相关的发病率方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。我们的目的是评估40岁及以上患者在进行或不进行肩袖修复(RCR)的情况下,前肩不稳定修复(即Bankart修复或骨性Bankart修复)的效果。
我们对2008年至2016年期间接受前肩不稳定手术修复的所有40岁及以上患者进行了回顾性病历审查。患者被分为4组:单纯Bankart修复、单纯骨性Bankart修复、Bankart修复同时进行RCR、骨性Bankart修复同时进行RCR。收集了人口统计学和不稳定病史数据。评估的临床和功能结果包括单项评估数字评分、美国肩肘外科医师评分、宾夕法尼亚肩部评分、疼痛视觉模拟量表评分、西安大略肩部不稳定指数评分和患者满意度评分。
本研究共纳入146例患者,其中103例(71%)有2年以上的结果评分。各组间结果评分无显著差异。对于单纯接受Bankart修复、单纯骨性Bankart修复、Bankart修复联合RCR以及骨性Bankart修复联合RCR的患者,单项评估数字评分分别为80.8±19.7、90.0±10.7、79.3±29.4和87.2±10.6(P = 0.284);美国肩肘外科医师评分分别为83.8±19.7、92.4±17.4、82.5±25.6和85.6±12.7(P = 0.114);宾夕法尼亚肩部功能评分分别为84.5±17.9、90.9±15.3、83.6±25.1和95.7±13.0(P = 0.286);西安大略肩部不稳定指数评分分别为481.0±519.5、292.1±414.3、548.9±690.5和