Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle WA.
Foundation for Health Care Quality, Seattle WA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Feb;2(1):100058. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100058. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
Women with prepregnancy class III obesity (body mass index ≥40 kg/m) are at an increased risk of perinatal complications and adverse obstetrical outcomes. Estimates of the magnitude of risk that these women face vary widely, which may reflect differences in institutional experience caring for women with obesity.
We sought to characterize the relationship between institutional prevalence of prepregnancy class III obesity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes among these women, hypothesizing that higher-prevalence institutions would have lower rates of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes among this population.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using chart-abstracted data on births in Washington state from Jan. 1, 2012, to Dec. 31, 2017. The analysis was restricted to hospitals that delivered at least 1 patient per month with prepregnancy class III obesity. Institutional prevalence of prepregnancy class III obesity was calculated, and hospitals were classified as either high or low prevalence. We included nulliparous women with vertex-presenting singleton pregnancies at ≥37 weeks of gestation. We excluded births with missing initial body mass index. The primary outcome was the incidence of cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes were induction of labor, postpartum complications, postpartum readmission, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. We compared outcomes between women with prepregnancy class III and all obesity at high- and low-prevalence hospitals using the χ test or the Fishers exact test as appropriate. Binary logistic regression was performed to compare outcomes at high- and low-prevalence hospitals. A hospital-adjusted multivariable regression model that controlled for baseline institutional rates of each outcome and compared outcomes between high- and low-prevalence hospitals was developed. A final multivariable logistic regression that controlled for both baseline institutional variation as well as potential clinical confounders was performed.
A total of 20,556 women at 6 hospitals were eligible for inclusion; the prevalence of prepregnancy class III obesity was 6.2% and 2.1% in high- and low-prevalence hospitals, respectively. Obese women, including those with class III obesity in a high-prevalence hospital, were more likely to be Latina and less likely to be of advanced maternal age and carry private insurance. After adjusting for the institutional cesarean delivery rate, women with prepregnancy class III obesity had significantly increased odds of cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 1.53, 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.10); however, after adjusting for significant covariates, the association no longer achieved significance (odds ratio, 1.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.97-2.94). The hospital-adjusted odds of postpartum readmission were significantly increased for women with prepregnancy class III obesity when delivering in low-prevalence institutions (odds ratio, 6.61, 95% confidence interval, 1.93-22.56), and the association was further strengthened after controlling for significant covariates (odds ratio, 15.20, 95% confidence interval, 2.32-99.53). None of the models demonstrated significantly different odds of induction of labor, postpartum complications, or neonatal intensive care unit admission by institutional prevalence of prepregnancy class III obesity.
Even after controlling for underlying hospital and subject characteristics, women with prepregnancy class III obesity had significantly increased odds of postpartum readmission, and a trend toward increased odds of cesarean delivery, when delivering in institutions with less experience caring for women with obesity.
孕前体重指数(BMI)≥40kg/m²的 III 级肥胖女性(肥胖症)在围产期并发症和不良产科结局方面风险增加。这些女性面临的风险程度估计差异很大,这可能反映了医疗机构在照顾肥胖症女性方面的经验差异。
我们旨在描述机构中孕前 III 级肥胖症的流行率与这些女性不良围产期结局风险之间的关系,假设高流行率机构中该人群的不良母婴和围产期结局发生率较低。
我们使用华盛顿州 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间的图表摘要数据进行了回顾性队列研究。分析仅限于每月至少有 1 例孕前 III 级肥胖症的分娩医院。计算了机构中孕前 III 级肥胖症的流行率,并将医院分为高流行率和低流行率。纳入了初产妇、头位单胎妊娠且孕周≥37 周的患者。排除了初始 BMI 缺失的分娩。主要结局是剖宫产率。次要结局为引产、产后并发症、产后再次入院和新生儿重症监护病房入院。我们使用 χ²检验或 Fisher 精确检验比较高、低流行率医院中 III 级和所有肥胖症女性的结局。使用二元逻辑回归比较高、低流行率医院的结局。建立了一个医院调整的多变量回归模型,该模型控制了每个结局的基线机构率,并比较了高、低流行率医院之间的结局。最后,我们进行了一个多变量逻辑回归分析,该分析同时控制了基线机构变异和潜在的临床混杂因素。
在 6 家医院的 20556 名女性中,有 6.2%和 2.1%的女性分别在高、低流行率医院中符合孕前 III 级肥胖症的标准。肥胖症女性,包括在高流行率医院中患有 III 级肥胖症的女性,更有可能是拉丁裔,不太可能是高龄产妇,并且更有可能拥有私人保险。在校正机构剖宫产率后,患有 III 级肥胖症的女性剖宫产的几率显著增加(优势比,1.53,95%置信区间,1.12-2.10);然而,在校正了显著的混杂因素后,这种关联不再具有统计学意义(优势比,1.68,95%置信区间,0.97-2.94)。在校正了显著的混杂因素后,在低流行率机构分娩的 III 级肥胖症女性产后再次入院的几率显著增加(优势比,6.61,95%置信区间,1.93-22.56),且关联在控制了显著混杂因素后进一步增强(优势比,15.20,95%置信区间,2.32-99.53)。没有任何模型显示机构中孕前 III 级肥胖症的流行率与引产、产后并发症或新生儿重症监护病房入院率之间存在显著不同的几率。
即使在校正了潜在的医院和患者特征后,患有 III 级肥胖症的女性在有经验较少的医疗机构中分娩时,产后再次入院的几率显著增加,且剖宫产的几率也有增加的趋势。