Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):364.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.021.
In women with gestational diabetes mellitus, it is not clear whether routine induction of labor at <40 weeks of gestation is beneficial to mother and newborn infant.
The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes among women with gestational diabetes mellitus who had induction of labor at either 38 or 39 weeks with those whose pregnancy was managed expectantly.
We included all women in Ontario, Canada, with diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus who had a singleton hospital birth at ≥38 + 0 weeks of gestation between April 2012 and March 2014. Data were obtained from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario, which is a province-wide registry of all births in Ontario, Canada. Women who underwent induction of labor at 38 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks of gestation (38-IOL; n = 1188) were compared with those who remained undelivered until 39 + 0 weeks of gestation (38-Expectant; n = 5229). Separately, those women who underwent induction of labor at 39 + 0 to 39 + 6 weeks of gestation (39-IOL; n = 1036) were compared with women who remained undelivered until 40 + 0 weeks of gestation (39-Expectant; n = 2162). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were adjusted for maternal age, parity, insulin treatment, and prepregnancy body mass index.
Of 281,480 women who gave birth during the study period, 14,600 women (5.2%) had gestational diabetes mellitus; of these, 8392 women (57.5%) met all inclusion criteria. Compared with the 38-Expectant group, those women in the 38-IOL group had lower odds for cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.90), higher odds for neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.69), and no difference in other maternal-newborn infant outcomes. Compared with the 39-Expectant group, women in the 39-IOL group likewise had lower odds for cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.93) but no difference in neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.11).
In women with gestational diabetes mellitus, the routine induction of labor at 38 or 39 weeks is associated with a lower risk of cesarean delivery compared with expectant management but may increase the risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission when done at <39 weeks of gestation.
对于患有妊娠期糖尿病的女性,在妊娠 40 周之前常规行引产分娩是否对母婴有益,目前尚不清楚。
本研究旨在比较妊娠 38 周和 39 周行引产分娩与期待治疗的妊娠期糖尿病女性的结局。
我们纳入了 2012 年 4 月至 2014 年 3 月期间加拿大安大略省所有在≥38+0 孕周行单胎医院分娩的妊娠期糖尿病女性。数据来源于安大略省全范围出生登记处(Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario),该登记处是安大略省所有分娩的省级登记处。38+0 至 38+6 孕周行引产分娩的女性(38-IOL 组;n=1188)与 39+0 至 40+0 孕周未分娩的女性(38-Expectant 组;n=5229)进行比较。此外,39+0 至 39+6 孕周行引产分娩的女性(39-IOL 组;n=1036)与 40+0 至 41+0 孕周未分娩的女性(39-Expectant 组;n=2162)进行比较。采用比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)对母亲年龄、产次、胰岛素治疗和孕前体质量指数(BMI)进行调整。
在研究期间分娩的 281480 名女性中,有 14600 名(5.2%)患有妊娠期糖尿病;其中 8392 名(57.5%)符合所有纳入标准。与 38-Expectant 组相比,38-IOL 组行剖宫产的可能性更低(调整后 OR,0.73;95%CI,0.52-0.90),新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)收治率更高(调整后 OR,1.36;95%CI,1.09-1.69),其他母婴结局无差异。与 39-Expectant 组相比,39-IOL 组行剖宫产的可能性也更低(调整后 OR,0.73;95%CI,0.58-0.93),但 NICU 收治率无差异(调整后 OR,0.83;95%CI,0.61-1.11)。
对于患有妊娠期糖尿病的女性,在妊娠 38 或 39 周时常规行引产分娩与期待治疗相比,剖宫产的风险较低,但在妊娠<39 周时行引产分娩可能会增加新生儿 NICU 收治率。