Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Brain Stimul. 2021 Jan-Feb;14(1):161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
The prediction violation account of automatic or pre-attentive change detection assumed that the inferior frontal cortex (IFC) is involved in establishing a prediction model for detecting unexpected changes. Evidence supporting the IFC's contribution to prediction model is mainly based on the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) to deviants violating predictions that are established based on the frequently presented standard events. However, deviant detection involves processes, such as events comparison, other than prediction model establishment.
The current study investigated the critical role of the IFC in establishing a prediction model during standards processing for subsequent deviant detection.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) was applied at the IFC to disrupt the processing of the initial 2 or 5 standards of a 3-, 6-, or 9-standard train, while the MMN responses to pitch deviant presented after the standard trains were recorded and compared.
An abolishment of MMN was only observed when TMS was delivered to the IFC at the initial 2 standards of the 3-standard train, but not at the initial 5 standards, or when TMS at the vertex or TMS sound recording was applied. The MMNs were also preserved when IFC TMS, vertex TMS, or TMS sound recording was applied at the initial 2 or 5 standards of longer trains.
The IFC plays a critical role in processing the initial standards of a short standard train for subsequent deviant detection. This result is consistent with the prediction violation account that the IFC is important for establishing the prediction model.
自动或非注意变化检测的预测违背假说认为,下额叶皮层(IFC)参与建立用于检测意外变化的预测模型。支持 IFC 对预测模型贡献的证据主要基于对违背基于频繁呈现的标准事件建立的预测的偏差的错配负波(MMN)。然而,偏差检测涉及到除了预测模型建立之外的过程,例如事件比较。
本研究旨在考察 IFC 在建立后续偏差检测过程中标准处理期间的预测模型的关键作用。
通过经颅磁刺激(TMS)作用于 IFC,在 3、6 或 9 个标准刺激序列中,分别在初始的第 2 或第 5 个标准刺激时,对标准刺激序列的前 2 个或 5 个标准进行干扰,同时记录和比较在标准刺激序列之后呈现的音高偏差的 MMN 反应。
仅当 TMS 施加于 3 个标准刺激序列的初始 2 个标准刺激时,才观察到 MMN 的消除,而不是在初始 5 个标准刺激时,或在施加于顶点或 TMS 录音时。当在更长的标准刺激序列的初始 2 个或 5 个标准刺激时施加 IFC-TMS、顶点-TMS 或 TMS 录音时,MMN 也得以保留。
IFC 在处理短标准刺激序列的初始标准刺激以进行后续偏差检测中起着关键作用。这一结果与预测违背假说一致,即 IFC 对建立预测模型很重要。