Zhang Ling, Yao Benxian, Zhang Xiaodan, Xu Hao
Center for Mental Health, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
College of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, China.
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Oct;49(10):1848-1856. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v49i10.4685.
The global COVID-19 pandemic caused great impacts and influences to human psychology. As a result, youths who are kept at home for a long time easily develop irritability and problematic behaviors. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the relations among irritability, coping style, and subjective well-being of the youth.
Overall, 1,033 youth respondents (aged 18-30 yr) from seven provinces in China were investigated in 2020 using the irritability, depression, and anxiety scale, coping style scale, and well-being index scale.
Among the dimensions of irritability of the youth, anxiety received the highest score, followed by introversion irritability, extroversion irritability, and depression. Irritability had significant regional differences. The total score of irritability among rural youth was significantly higher than that of urban youth (0.05). The irritability level of youths with parents' emotional status was harmonious and good relations with family members and peers was far lower than those of youths who have poor relations between parents, family members, and peers (0.05). The irritability level of youths with a lower monthly household income was higher (0.05). Irritability of the youth had significantly negative correlations with positive response and SWB, and it had a significantly positive correlative with negative response. Coping style can mediate the relationship between irritability and SWB of the youth to some extent.
Significant correlations exist among irritability, coping style, and SWB of the youth. Irritability can be used to predict SWB indirectly through positive response.
全球新冠疫情对人类心理造成了巨大冲击和影响。因此,长期居家的青少年容易出现易怒情绪和问题行为。然而,青少年易怒情绪、应对方式与主观幸福感之间的关系相对较少受到关注。
2020年,使用易怒、抑郁和焦虑量表、应对方式量表和幸福感指数量表,对来自中国七个省份的1033名青少年受访者(年龄在18 - 30岁之间)进行了调查。
在青少年易怒情绪的维度中,焦虑得分最高,其次是内向易怒、外向易怒和抑郁。易怒情绪存在显著的地区差异。农村青少年的易怒总分显著高于城市青少年(P<0.05)。父母情绪状况和谐、与家庭成员及同伴关系良好的青少年的易怒水平远低于父母、家庭成员及同伴关系较差的青少年(P<0.05)。月家庭收入较低的青少年易怒水平较高(P<0.05)。青少年的易怒情绪与积极应对和主观幸福感呈显著负相关,与消极应对呈显著正相关。应对方式在一定程度上可以调节青少年易怒情绪与主观幸福感之间的关系。
青少年的易怒情绪、应对方式与主观幸福感之间存在显著相关性。易怒情绪可通过积极应对间接预测主观幸福感。