Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cardiol J. 2022;29(5):815-823. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0167. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
The efficacy of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) in improving adherence and risk factor control for cardiovascular disease has not been reported consistently. Here, we compared adherence and efficacy between an olmesartan/rosuvastatin FDC and the usual regimen.
In this 6-month, open-label, randomized, active-control study, we screened 154 patients; of these, 150 were randomly assigned to receive either olmesartan/rosuvastatin FDC or the usual regimen with separate angiotensin receptor blockers and statins. In total, 135 patients completed the study (median age: 68 years; male: 68.9%). The primary outcome was patients' adherence; the secondary outcomes were changes in blood pressure (BP) and lipid parameters.
During follow-up, adherence in both groups was high and similar between the groups (98.9% and 98.3% in the FDC and usual regimen groups, respectively, p = 0.328). Changes in systolic (-8 and -5 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.084) and diastolic BP (-5 and -2 mmHg, p = 0.092) did not differ significantly, although they were numerically greater in the FDC group. Changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were greater in the FDC group (-13 and -4 mg/dL, respectively, p = 0.019), whereas changes in other lipid parameters were similar between the groups. The test drugs were well tolerated, showing no difference in safety between the groups.
Patients' adherence was excellent and similar in the groups, whereas the reduction in the LDL-C level was greater in the FDC group. We provide comprehensive information on the adherence and efficacy of an FDC compared to the usual regimen in Korean patients with high cardiovascular risk.
固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)在改善心血管疾病的依从性和危险因素控制方面的疗效并不一致。在此,我们比较了奥美沙坦/罗苏伐他汀 FDC 与常规治疗方案的依从性和疗效。
在这项为期 6 个月、开放标签、随机、活性对照研究中,我们筛选了 154 名患者;其中,150 名患者被随机分配接受奥美沙坦/罗苏伐他汀 FDC 或常规治疗方案,分别使用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物。共有 135 名患者完成了研究(中位年龄:68 岁;男性:68.9%)。主要结局是患者的依从性;次要结局是血压(BP)和血脂参数的变化。
在随访期间,两组的依从性均较高且组间相似(FDC 组和常规治疗组分别为 98.9%和 98.3%,p=0.328)。收缩压(-8mmHg 和-5mmHg,p=0.084)和舒张压(-5mmHg 和-2mmHg,p=0.092)的变化无显著差异,尽管 FDC 组的变化数值更大。FDC 组的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平下降更大(-13mg/dL 和-4mg/dL,p=0.019),而两组之间其他血脂参数的变化相似。试验药物均耐受良好,两组之间的安全性无差异。
两组患者的依从性均较好且相似,而 FDC 组 LDL-C 水平的降低更为显著。我们提供了有关韩国高心血管风险患者 FDC 与常规治疗方案的依从性和疗效的综合信息。