• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特刊介绍:创伤治疗与康复的补充医学和整体健康方法。

Introduction to the special issue: Complementary medicine and integrative health approaches to trauma therapy and recovery.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2020 Nov;12(8):821-824. doi: 10.1037/tra0000994.

DOI:10.1037/tra0000994
PMID:33346679
Abstract

The popularity of complementary and integrative health (also complementary integrated health; CIH) approaches has significantly increased in recent years. According to the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH), part of the National Institutes of Health, about 1 in 3 adults and 1 in 9 children used CIH approaches to healing. Some reports estimate that the use of CIH approaches will continue to increase (Clarke et al., 2015) as these therapies are cost effective and also due to the difficulties in finding trained mental health professionals (Simon et al., 2020). For the purpose of this special issue, we use the NCCIH's definition of CIH as "a group of diverse medical and health care systems, practices, and products that are not presently considered to be part of conventional medicine" (Barnes et al., 2004, p. v). However, the integration of these therapies into the health system has not followed the same pattern despite the fact that patients report the need to discuss CIH therapies with their doctors or are actually using them (de Jonge et al., 2018; Jou & Johnson, 2016; Stapleton et al., 2015). This inability to keep up with the demand or patients' preference is possibly due to providers' lack of understanding and/or knowledge of these therapies, as well as scientific skepticism (Ali & Katz, 2015; Fletcher et al., 2017). Using data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey, Jou & Johnson (2016) identified patterns of CIH use in the United States and reasons for patients' nondisclosure of the use of these therapies. Patients' fear of disclosure due to perceived skepticism or disapproval from their provider was frequently attributed as a cause of patients' nondisclosures to providers about the use of these therapies (Eisenberg et al., 2001; Jou & Johnson, 2016; Thomson et al., 2012). The arrival of patient-centered care models is beginning to shift the ways we understand the patient's role in treatment engagement. Patient-centered approaches often emphasize the use of preventative and holistic wellness models that go beyond the use of evidence-based treatments. This approach also seeks to be culturally responsive, which is a key factor in addressing health disparities in the United States (American Psychological Association [APA], 2019). The Institute of Medicine, in its report on CIH therapies, highlighted the importance of engaging patients in their own care, including having a decision about therapeutic options (Bondurant et al., 2005). Likewise, the Race and Ethnicity Guidelines in Psychology (APA, 2019) recommend psychologists engage the patient's cultural beliefs, or what Kleinman called the "explanatory belief model" (Kleinman, 1978)- for example, by "aim[ing] to understand and encourage indigenous/ ethnocultural sources of healing within professional practice" (APA, 2019, p. 24). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

近年来,补充和整合健康(也称为补充综合健康;CIH)方法的普及显著增加。根据美国国立卫生研究院下属的国家补充与综合健康中心(NCCIH)的数据,约有 1/3 的成年人和 1/9 的儿童使用 CIH 方法进行治疗。一些报告估计,随着这些疗法具有成本效益,而且也因为难以找到训练有素的心理健康专业人员(Simon 等人,2020),CIH 方法的使用将继续增加。出于本期特刊的目的,我们使用 NCCIH 将 CIH 定义为“一组不同的医学和保健系统、实践和产品,目前不被认为是常规医学的一部分”(Barnes 等人,2004 年,第 v 页)。然而,尽管患者报告需要与医生讨论 CIH 疗法,或者实际上正在使用这些疗法,但这些疗法在卫生系统中的整合并没有遵循相同的模式(de Jonge 等人,2018 年;Jou 和 Johnson,2016 年;Stapleton 等人,2015 年)。这种无法满足需求或患者偏好的情况可能是由于提供者对这些疗法缺乏理解和/或了解,以及对科学的怀疑(Ali 和 Katz,2015 年;Fletcher 等人,2017 年)。使用 2012 年全国健康访谈调查的数据,Jou 和 Johnson(2016 年)确定了美国 CIH 使用的模式以及患者不披露这些疗法使用情况的原因。患者由于担心提供者的怀疑或不赞成而不愿披露的情况经常被归因于患者不向提供者披露这些疗法的使用情况的原因(Eisenberg 等人,2001 年;Jou 和 Johnson,2016 年;Thomson 等人,2012 年)。以患者为中心的护理模式的出现开始改变我们对患者在治疗参与中的角色的理解方式。以患者为中心的方法通常强调使用预防和整体健康模型,而不仅仅是基于证据的治疗方法。这种方法还力求具有文化响应性,这是解决美国健康差异的关键因素(美国心理学会 [APA],2019 年)。医学研究所(IOM)在其关于 CIH 疗法的报告中强调了让患者参与自己的治疗的重要性,包括对治疗选择做出决定(Bondurant 等人,2005 年)。同样,心理学中的种族和民族准则(APA,2019 年)建议心理学家参与患者的文化信仰,或者 Kleinman 所说的“解释性信仰模型”(Kleinman,1978 年)-例如,“旨在理解和鼓励专业实践中的本土/民族文化疗愈来源”(APA,2019 年,第 24 页)。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Introduction to the special issue: Complementary medicine and integrative health approaches to trauma therapy and recovery.特刊介绍:创伤治疗与康复的补充医学和整体健康方法。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Nov;12(8):821-824. doi: 10.1037/tra0000994.
2
Complementary and Integrated Health Approaches: What Do Veterans Use and Want.补充和整合健康方法:退伍军人的使用和需求。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1192-1199. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04862-6. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches Offered in the Veterans Health Administration: Results of a National Organizational Survey.退伍军人健康管理局提供的补充和综合健康方法:一项全国性组织调查的结果。
J Altern Complement Med. 2021 Mar;27(S1):S124-S130. doi: 10.1089/acm.2020.0395.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
Consensus Recommendations to NCCIH from Research Faculty in a Transdisciplinary Academic Consortium for Complementary and Integrative Health and Medicine.跨学科学术联盟中从事补充与整合健康及医学研究的教员对国立补充与综合健康中心的共识建议。
J Altern Complement Med. 2015 Jul;21(7):386-94. doi: 10.1089/acm.2014.0295. Epub 2015 May 28.
7
Providers' and Administrators' Perceptions of Complementary and Integrative Health Practices Across the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局内医疗服务提供者和管理人员对补充与整合健康实践的看法
J Altern Complement Med. 2017 Jan;23(1):26-34. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0236. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
Complementary and integrative interventions for PTSD.创伤后应激障碍的补充和整合干预措施。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2247888. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2247888.
9
We Built it, But Did They Come: Veterans' Use of VA Healthcare System-Provided Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches.我们建立了它,但他们来了吗:退伍军人使用退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统提供的补充和综合健康方法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):905-912. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07889-4. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Complementary medicine in psychology practice: an analysis of Australian psychology guidelines and a comparison with other psychology associations from English speaking countries.心理学实践中的补充医学:对澳大利亚心理学准则的分析及与英语国家其他心理学协会的比较。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12906-022-03620-2.
2
Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Substance Use Disorders: A Scientometric Analysis and Visualization of Its Use Between 2001 and 2020.物质使用障碍的补充与替代医学:2001年至2020年期间其应用的科学计量分析与可视化
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 5;12:722240. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.722240. eCollection 2021.