Spinelli Maria, Aureli Tiziana, Coppola Gabrielle, Ponzetti Silvia, Lionetti Francesca, Scialpi Valentina, Fasolo Mirco
Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Department of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Attach Hum Dev. 2022 Feb;24(1):93-114. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2020.1860348. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
Previous studies reported an inconsistency between verbal extracts and emotional physiological activation in dismissing individuals when narrating their early caregiving experience at the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). This study aimed to explore this discrepancy by analyzing the degree of concordance between verbal content and prosodic characteristics, index of physiological activation, when dismissing and secure individuals discuss negative childhood memories during the AAI. Results showed that secure participants presented a high coherence between verbal content and emotional activation, as expressed by prosody, revealing a reprocess of negative experiences that is the core feature of the development of secure working models. In contrast, dismissing participants' prosodic characteristics were discrepant with the verbal content. These individuals downplayed the nature and impact of negative experiences and emotions, but used a prosody that revealed a high emotional arousal. The difference between the two groups was more evident for participants who had experienced more rejecting parents.
先前的研究报告称，在成人依恋访谈（AAI）中，当疏离型个体叙述其早期照料经历时，言语摘录与情绪生理激活之间存在不一致。本研究旨在通过分析疏离型个体和安全型个体在AAI中讨论负面童年记忆时言语内容与韵律特征（生理激活指标）之间的一致程度，来探究这种差异。结果表明，安全型参与者的言语内容与情绪激活之间呈现出高度的一致性，如韵律所表达的那样，揭示了负面经历的重新加工，这是安全型工作模式发展的核心特征。相比之下，疏离型参与者的韵律特征与言语内容不一致。这些个体淡化了负面经历和情绪的性质及影响，但使用的韵律却显示出高度的情绪唤醒。对于那些经历过更多拒绝型父母的参与者来说，两组之间的差异更为明显。
