• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个世纪的回顾:面神经麻痹的法医学意义。

A Century in Review: Medicolegal Implications of Facial Nerve Paralysis.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 Dec;23(6):417-421. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0390. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1089/fpsam.2020.0390
PMID:33347787
Abstract

It is important to recognize factors that may mitigate the risk of a potential lawsuit and increase knowledge and awareness of physicians. To evaluate and characterize facial nerve paralysis litigation claims and related potential causes. These data were extracted from the two main computerized legal databases: WestLaw and LexisNexis. The data were queried on April 2, 2020. The records from 1919 to 2020 were obtained from a population-based setting. A total of 186 cases were included. Data were gathered for all alleged cases of facial nerve paralysis. There was a continuous rise in the amount of malpractice payments with the highest mean amount being in the past decade. From 1919 to 2020, a total of 186 malpractice cases for facial nerve damage were identified. A total amount of $89,178,857.99 was rewarded to plaintiffs in 66 cases. The mean amount of paid malpractice claim was $1,351,194.80. Improper performance/treatment was the most common reason for alleged litigation ( = 97). This was followed by misdiagnosis/delayed diagnosis ( = 47), and failure of informed consent ( = 34). The highest number of malpractice claims with a total of 53 cases was from 1991 to 2000. The highest mean amount per payment was in the past decade (2011-2020) with a mean of $3,841,052.68. Over the past century, improper performance/procedure, delayed/misdiagnosis, and failure of informed consent were the most common reasons for litigations related to facial nerve paralysis.

摘要

认识可能减轻潜在诉讼风险并提高医生知识和意识的因素很重要。评估和描述面神经瘫痪诉讼索赔和相关潜在原因。这些数据是从两个主要的计算机法律数据库:WestLaw 和 LexisNexis 中提取出来的。数据于 2020 年 4 月 2 日查询。记录从 1919 年到 2020 年是从基于人群的环境中获得的。共纳入 186 例。收集了所有被指控的面神经瘫痪病例的数据。随着医疗事故赔偿金额的不断增加,过去十年的平均赔偿金额最高。从 1919 年到 2020 年,总共确定了 186 例面神经损伤的医疗事故案件。共有 66 例案件判给原告 89178857.99 美元。已支付医疗事故索赔的平均金额为 1351194.80 美元。不当表现/治疗是最常见的诉讼原因(=97)。其次是误诊/延迟诊断(=47)和未获得知情同意(=34)。医疗事故索赔最多的是 1991 年至 2000 年,共 53 例。过去十年(2011-2020 年)的平均每笔支付金额最高,为 3841052.68 美元。在过去的一个世纪里,不当的表现/程序、延迟/误诊和未获得知情同意是与面神经瘫痪相关的诉讼的最常见原因。

相似文献

1
A Century in Review: Medicolegal Implications of Facial Nerve Paralysis.一个世纪的回顾:面神经麻痹的法医学意义。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 Dec;23(6):417-421. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0390. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
2
Analysis of Factors Associated With Rhytidectomy Malpractice Litigation Cases.除皱术医疗事故诉讼案件相关因素分析
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jul 1;19(4):255-259. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1782.
3
Salivary gland surgery and medical malpractice.唾液腺手术与医疗事故。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Apr;148(4):589-94. doi: 10.1177/0194599813475566. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
4
The paralyzing legal costs of facial nerve injury in head and neck tumors.头颈部肿瘤面神经损伤的瘫痪性法律费用。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):102693. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102693. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
5
Litigation trends and costs in otorhinolaryngology.耳鼻喉科的诉讼趋势与成本
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Oct;129(10):941-4. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115002261. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
6
Trends in medical malpractice claims in patients with cleft or craniofacial abnormalities in the United States.美国唇腭裂或颅面畸形患者医疗事故索赔趋势。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;90:214-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
7
Lasers and losers in the eyes of the law: liability for head and neck procedures.法律视角下的激光与失败者:头颈部手术的责任
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(4):277-83. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.21.
8
Jury verdicts, outcomes, and tort reform features of malpractice cases involving thoracic outlet syndrome.涉及胸廓出口综合征的医疗事故案件的陪审团裁决、结果和侵权改革特征。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):962-967. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.098. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
Lessons learned in otologic surgery: 30 years of malpractice cases in the United States.耳科学手术的教训:美国 30 年的医疗事故案例。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Sep;34(7):1173-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318298a8fb.
10
Malpractice litigation in the endovascular era.血管内治疗时代的医疗事故诉讼
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.081. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Medicolegal Challenges of Facial Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.面部整形手术的法医学挑战:一项系统综述
Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Aug 18;45(9):973-984. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaf082.
2
Effect of Septal Extension Graft on Creating and Maintaining Tip Rotation in Tongue-in-Groove Technique: A Case Control Study.鼻中隔延伸移植物对榫槽技术鼻尖旋转度的影响:一项病例对照研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Feb;46(1):351-360. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02397-y. Epub 2021 Jun 15.