• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国医疗保险人群中静脉血栓栓塞症患者的临床相关亚组中,比较阿哌沙班与华法林的安全性和有效性。

Safety and effectiveness of apixaban compared with warfarin among clinically-relevant subgroups of venous thromboembolism patients in the United States Medicare population.

机构信息

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.

Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2021 Feb;198:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.11.039. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2020.11.039
PMID:33348190
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The AMPLIFY trial found significantly lower major bleeding (MB) and similar recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) risks associated with apixaban vs warfarin among patients with VTE.

OBJECTIVES

To compare MB, clinically-relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, and recurrent VTE risks among clinically-relevant subgroups of newly diagnosed elderly patients with VTE prescribed apixaban vs warfarin.

METHODS

US Medicare patients prescribed apixaban or warfarin within 30 days post-VTE encounter were identified. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for patient characteristics. Cox models were used to assess MB, CRNM bleeding, and recurrent VTE. Subgroup analyses were conducted for index VTE encounter type, index VTE diagnosis type, index VTE etiology, sex, and frailty.

RESULTS

Post-PSM, 11,363 matched pairs of patients prescribed apixaban or warfarin were identified. Apixaban had lower MB (Hazard Ratio [HR]:0.76; 95% CI:0.64-0.91) and similar recurrent VTE risks (HR:1.04; 95% CI:0.75-1.43) vs warfarin. No significant interactions were observed between treatment and index VTE encounter type, index VTE diagnosis type, or sex for risk of MB, CRNM bleeding, or recurrent VTE. Significant interactions: frail patients prescribed apixaban had a 15% lower, while non-frail patients prescribed apixaban had 32% lower CRNM bleeding risk vs those prescribed warfarin. Patients with provoked VTE prescribed apixaban trended toward a higher, while those with unprovoked VTE trended toward a lower risk of recurrent VTE vs patients prescribed warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

Apixaban was associated with significantly lower risks of MB and CRNM bleeding, and similar risk of recurrent VTE as compared with warfarin across the overall population and most subgroups.

摘要

背景

AMPLIFY 试验发现,与华法林相比,新型抗凝药阿哌沙班可显著降低 VTE 患者的大出血(MB)和相似的复发性静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)风险。

目的

比较阿哌沙班与华法林治疗新诊断的老年 VTE 患者的 MB、临床相关非大出血(CRNM)出血和复发性 VTE 风险。

方法

在美国医疗保险患者中,确定在 VTE 发病后 30 天内使用阿哌沙班或华法林治疗的患者。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来控制患者特征。采用 Cox 模型评估 MB、CRNM 出血和复发性 VTE。进行了亚组分析,包括索引 VTE 发作类型、索引 VTE 诊断类型、索引 VTE 病因、性别和脆弱性。

结果

PSM 后,确定了 11363 对接受阿哌沙班或华法林治疗的患者。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班的 MB 风险较低(风险比 [HR]:0.76;95%置信区间:0.64-0.91),且复发性 VTE 风险相似(HR:1.04;95%置信区间:0.75-1.43)。治疗与索引 VTE 发作类型、索引 VTE 诊断类型或性别之间未观察到 MB、CRNM 出血或复发性 VTE 风险的显著交互作用。有显著的相互作用:与华法林相比,阿哌沙班治疗的脆弱患者的 CRNM 出血风险降低 15%,而非脆弱患者的 CRNM 出血风险降低 32%。与华法林相比,有诱发性 VTE 的阿哌沙班治疗患者的复发性 VTE 风险升高,而无诱发性 VTE 的阿哌沙班治疗患者的复发性 VTE 风险降低。

结论

与华法林相比,阿哌沙班在总体人群和大多数亚组中,MB 和 CRNM 出血风险显著降低,复发性 VTE 风险相似。

相似文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of apixaban compared with warfarin among clinically-relevant subgroups of venous thromboembolism patients in the United States Medicare population.美国医疗保险人群中静脉血栓栓塞症患者的临床相关亚组中,比较阿哌沙班与华法林的安全性和有效性。
Thromb Res. 2021 Feb;198:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.11.039. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
2
Safety, effectiveness, and health care cost comparisons among elderly patients with venous thromboembolism prescribed warfarin or apixaban in the United States Medicare population.在美国 Medicare 人群中,接受华法林或阿哌沙班治疗的老年静脉血栓栓塞症患者的安全性、有效性和医疗保健成本比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Dec;35(12):2043-2051. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1653067. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
3
Comparative Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Warfarin Versus Apixaban in the Treatment of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism in a Large U.S. Commercial Claims Database.在美国大型商业索赔数据库中,比较华法林与阿哌沙班治疗静脉血栓栓塞症患者的临床及经济结局。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Aug;26(8):1017-1026. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19311. Epub 2020 May 26.
4
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban Versus Warfarin Among Older Patients with Venous Thromboembolism with Different Demographics and Socioeconomic Status.阿哌沙班与华法林治疗不同人口统计学和社会经济地位的老年静脉血栓栓塞症患者的有效性和安全性。
Adv Ther. 2021 Nov;38(11):5519-5533. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01918-0. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
5
Bleeding and recurrent VTE with apixaban vs warfarin as outpatient treatment: time-course and subgroup analyses.阿哌沙班与华法林作为门诊治疗的出血和复发性 VTE:时间过程和亚组分析。
Blood Adv. 2020 Jan 28;4(2):432-439. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001081.
6
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban versus Warfarin as Outpatient Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in U.S. Clinical Practice.美国临床实践中阿哌沙班与华法林作为门诊静脉血栓栓塞症治疗的有效性和安全性。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Nov;118(11):1951-1961. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673689. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
7
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban vs Warfarin in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism with Risk Factors for Bleeding or for Recurrences.阿哌沙班与华法林治疗伴有出血或复发风险的静脉血栓栓塞症患者的有效性和安全性。
Adv Ther. 2023 Apr;40(4):1705-1735. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02440-1. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
8
Comparative effectiveness and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism.阿哌沙班与华法林治疗静脉血栓栓塞症患者的疗效和安全性比较。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Jan 24;77(3):188-195. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz307.
9
Association of Type of Oral Anticoagulant Dispensed With Adverse Clinical Outcomes in Patients Extending Anticoagulation Therapy Beyond 90 Days After Hospitalization for Venous Thromboembolism.口服抗凝药物类型与静脉血栓栓塞症住院后抗凝治疗超过 90 天患者不良临床结局的相关性。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 15;327(11):1051-1060. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1920.
10
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin, and Warfarin among Venous Thromboembolism Patients with Active Cancer: A U.S. Claims Data Analysis.阿哌沙班、低分子肝素和华法林在伴有活动性癌症的静脉血栓栓塞症患者中的有效性和安全性:一项美国理赔数据分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2021 Mar;121(3):383-395. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718728. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism using Real-World Data: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.真实世界数据中直接口服抗凝药与华法林治疗静脉血栓栓塞症患者的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Nov;24(6):823-839. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00677-x. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
2
Developing Validated Tools to Identify Pulmonary Embolism in Electronic Databases: Rationale and Design of the PE-EHR+ Study.开发用于在电子数据库中识别肺栓塞的有效工具:PE-EHR+ 研究的原理和设计。
Thromb Haemost. 2023 Jun;123(6):649-662. doi: 10.1055/a-2039-3222. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
3
Scoping Review of Studies Evaluating Frailty and Its Association with Medication Harm.
评价衰弱及其与药物伤害相关性的研究的范围综述。
Drugs Aging. 2022 May;39(5):333-353. doi: 10.1007/s40266-022-00940-3. Epub 2022 May 22.