Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;42(8):968-977. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.1351. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
To determine risk factors for carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) and to determine the prognostic impact of CPOs.
A retrospective matched case-control study.
Inpatients across Scotland in 2010-2016 were included. Patients with a CPO were matched with 2 control groups by hospital, admission date, specimen type, and bacteria. One group comprised patients either infected or colonized with a non-CPO and the other group were general inpatients.
Conditional logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for CPO infection and colonization, respectively. Mortality rates and length of postisolation hospitalization were compared between CPO and non-CPO patients.
In total, 70 CPO infection cases (with 210 general inpatient controls and 121 non-CPO controls) and 34 CPO colonization cases (with 102 general inpatient controls and 60 non-CPO controls) were identified. Risk factors for CPO infection versus general inpatients were prior hospital stay (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-10.78; P = .005), longer hospitalization (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10; P < .001), longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.01-1.98; P = .045), and immunodeficiency (aOR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.16-11.66; P = .027). Risk factors for CPO colonization were prior high-dependency unit (HDU) stay (aOR, 11.46; 95% CI, 1.27-103.09; P = .030) and endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic (ENM) diseases (aOR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.02-11.33; P = .046). Risk factors for CPO infection versus non-CPO infection were prolonged hospitalization (aOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .038) and HDU stay (aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.26; P = .024). No differences in mortality rates were detected between CPO and non-CPO patients. CPO infection was associated with longer hospital stay than non-CPO infection (P = .041).
A history of (prolonged) hospitalization, prolonged ICU or HDU stay; ENM diseases; and being immunocompromised increased risk for CPO. CPO infection was not associated with increased mortality but was associated with prolonged hospital stay.
确定碳青霉烯酶产生菌(CPO)的危险因素,并确定 CPO 的预后影响。
回顾性匹配病例对照研究。
纳入 2010 年至 2016 年苏格兰各地的住院患者。CPO 患者与医院、入院日期、标本类型和细菌匹配的 2 个对照组进行匹配。一组患者感染或定植了非 CPO,另一组是普通住院患者。
分别使用条件逻辑回归模型确定 CPO 感染和定植的危险因素。比较 CPO 和非 CPO 患者的死亡率和隔离后住院时间。
共确定了 70 例 CPO 感染病例(210 例普通住院患者对照和 121 例非 CPO 对照)和 34 例 CPO 定植病例(102 例普通住院患者对照和 60 例非 CPO 对照)。与普通住院患者相比,CPO 感染的危险因素为先前的住院治疗(调整后的优势比 [aOR],4.05;95%置信区间 [CI],1.52-10.78;P =.005)、住院时间延长(aOR,1.07;95%CI,1.04-1.10;P <.001)、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间延长(aOR,1.41;95%CI,1.01-1.98;P =.045)和免疫功能低下(aOR,3.68;95%CI,1.16-11.66;P =.027)。CPO 定植的危险因素为先前的高依赖单位(HDU)住院治疗(aOR,11.46;95%CI,1.27-103.09;P =.030)和内分泌、营养和代谢(ENM)疾病(aOR,3.41;95%CI,1.02-11.33;P =.046)。与非 CPO 感染相比,CPO 感染的危险因素为住院时间延长(aOR,1.02;95%CI,1.00-1.03;P =.038)和 HDU 住院治疗(aOR,1.13;95%CI,1.02-1.26;P =.024)。未发现 CPO 和非 CPO 患者的死亡率存在差异。CPO 感染与非 CPO 感染相比,住院时间更长(P =.041)。
(延长)住院时间延长、ICU 或 HDU 住院时间延长、ENM 疾病和免疫功能低下增加了 CPO 的风险。CPO 感染与死亡率增加无关,但与住院时间延长有关。