Suppr超能文献

成人人工耳蜗植入术后失败和翻修手术:一项 10 年单机构回顾性和文献系统评价。

Failure and Revision Surgery After Cochlear Implantation in the Adult Population: A 10-year Single-institution Retrospective and Systematic Review of the Literature.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2021 Mar 1;42(3):408-413. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002940.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize failure rate and etiology after cochlear implantation; to identify predictors and describe outcomes after implant failure.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review and systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Embase.

SETTING

Academic Cochlear Implant Center.

SUBJECT POPULATION

Four hundred ninety-eight devices in 439 distinct adult patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Unilateral or bilateral cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Implant failure rate and etiology.

RESULTS

A total of 32 devices (5.9%) failed in 31 patients encompassing the following failure types in accordance with the European Consensus Statement of Cochlear Implants: 17 device failures (53.1%), 11 failures due to performance decrement/adverse reactions (34.4%), and 4 medical reasons (12.9%). There was no significant difference in age, sex, or manufacturer between patients with and without failures. Twenty-five percent of patients with failure leading to explantation had childhood onset of deafness compared to 12.1% of patients with adult-onset hearing loss (OR = 2.42; p = 0.04). Performance decrement/adverse reaction patients had an older average age at implantation compared to device failure patients (mean 68.5 yr 95% CI: 59.9-77.1 vs mean 47.6 yr, CI: 39.9-55.3, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in time to failure, sex, or device manufacturer between the different types of failures. Twenty-nine patients who experienced CI failure underwent a revision surgery, while the remaining two opted for explantation without reimplantation. One patient who underwent revision surgery subsequently presented with a second failure and underwent a second revision, which was successful.In our systematic review, 815 citations were reviewed, and 9 studies were selected for inclusion. Overall failure rate across all studies was 5.5%. Device failure was the leading cause of failure in the majority (6/9) of studies, accounting for 40.8% of all failures. Medical reasons were the second leading cause at 33.6%, followed by performance decrement/adverse reaction (20.9%) and other (4.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implant failure is a rare phenomenon. Childhood-onset of hearing loss appears to be associated with an increased risk of overall failure. Older patients are at increased risk for performance decrement/adverse reaction. Revision surgery success rates remain very high and patients with failure of any cause should be offered explantation with concurrent reimplantation.

摘要

目的

描述人工耳蜗植入后的失败率和病因;确定预测因素并描述植入失败后的结果。

研究设计

使用 PubMed 和 Embase 进行回顾性图表审查和系统综述。

地点

学术人工耳蜗植入中心。

研究人群

439 名成年患者中的 498 个设备。

干预措施

单侧或双侧人工耳蜗植入。

主要观察指标

植入物的失败率和病因。

结果

31 名患者中有 32 个设备(5.9%)出现故障,符合欧洲人工耳蜗植入共识声明的以下故障类型:17 个设备故障(53.1%),11 个因性能下降/不良反应(34.4%)和 4 个医疗原因(12.9%)。失败和未失败患者的年龄、性别或制造商之间无显著差异。25%的故障导致取出的患者有儿童期耳聋,而 12.1%的患者有成人听力损失(OR=2.42;p=0.04)。与设备故障患者相比,出现性能下降/不良反应的患者植入时的平均年龄更大(平均 68.5 岁,95%CI:59.9-77.1 岁 vs 平均 47.6 岁,CI:39.9-55.3 岁,p<0.01)。不同类型的故障之间,故障时间、性别或设备制造商均无显著差异。29 名经历过 CI 失败的患者接受了修复手术,而其余 2 名患者选择了不重新植入的取出。一名接受修复手术的患者随后出现第二次失败并接受第二次修复,手术成功。在我们的系统综述中,共审查了 815 条引文,并选择了 9 项研究进行纳入。所有研究的总体失败率为 5.5%。设备故障是大多数(6/9)研究中失败的主要原因,占所有失败的 40.8%。医疗原因是第二大原因,占 33.6%,其次是性能下降/不良反应(20.9%)和其他(4.8%)。

结论

人工耳蜗植入失败是一种罕见现象。儿童期听力损失似乎与整体失败风险增加有关。老年患者发生性能下降/不良反应的风险增加。修复手术成功率仍然非常高,任何原因导致失败的患者都应接受取出同时进行再次植入。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验