• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同垂直面型的骨骼I类错牙合患者气道尺寸的评估:沙特人群样本的头影测量研究

Assessment of airway dimensions in skeletal Class I malocclusion patients with various vertical facial patterns: A cephalometric study in a sample of the Saudi population.

作者信息

Alfawzan Ahmed Ali

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Ar Rass, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Orthod Sci. 2020 Aug 18;9:12. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_10_20. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.4103/jos.JOS_10_20
PMID:33354538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7749458/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare airway widths among skeletal Class I malocclusion patients with different vertical facial patterns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 103 lateral cephalograms of skeletal Class I patients (mean age of 20 ± 2.3 years) with no history of orthodontic treatment, trauma, facial syndromes, or nasopharyngeal dysfunction were included. Based on the Frankfort-mandibular plane angle measurements, the sample was divided into three groups: low-angle, high-angle, and normal-angle groups. Upper and lower pharyngeal airway widths were measured as described by McNamara. The analysis of variance test was performed to compare the means of groups. Pairwise comparisons were performed using Tukey's post-hoc test. Differences were considered statistically significant at < 0.05.

RESULTS

ANOVA showed a significant mean difference between the groups for both the upper and lower airway widths with values of 0.011 and 0.003, respectively. Tukey Pairwise comparisons showed the upper airway width to be significantly narrower in the high-angle group compared to the normal-angle ( = 0.021) and low-angle groups ( = 0.013). Furthermore, the lower airway width in the high angle group was significantly narrower than the normal angle ( = 0.020) and low-angle groups ( = 0.017). There were no statistically significant differences between normal and low angle groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The upper and lower pharyngeal widths in the Class I high-angle group were significantly narrower than those in the normal-angle and low-angle groups.

摘要

目的

比较不同垂直面部类型的骨性安氏I类错牙合患者的气道宽度。

材料与方法

纳入103例无正畸治疗史、外伤史、面部综合征或鼻咽功能障碍的骨性安氏I类患者(平均年龄20±2.3岁)的头颅侧位片。根据Frankfort下颌平面角测量值,将样本分为三组:低角组、高角组和正常角组。按照McNamara的方法测量上下咽气道宽度。采用方差分析比较各组均值。使用Tukey事后检验进行两两比较。差异在P<0.05时被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

方差分析显示,上下气道宽度在各组间均存在显著的均值差异,P值分别为0.011和0.003。Tukey两两比较显示,高角组的上气道宽度显著窄于正常角组(P=0.021)和低角组(P=0.013)。此外,高角组的下气道宽度显著窄于正常角组(P=0.020)和低角组(P=0.017)。正常角组和低角组之间无统计学显著差异。

结论

I类高角组的上下咽宽度显著窄于正常角组和低角组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9484/7749458/7b4f67ab967b/JOS-9-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9484/7749458/7b4f67ab967b/JOS-9-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9484/7749458/7b4f67ab967b/JOS-9-12-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of airway dimensions in skeletal Class I malocclusion patients with various vertical facial patterns: A cephalometric study in a sample of the Saudi population.不同垂直面型的骨骼I类错牙合患者气道尺寸的评估:沙特人群样本的头影测量研究
J Orthod Sci. 2020 Aug 18;9:12. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_10_20. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparison of different craniofacial patterns with pharyngeal widths.不同颅面模式与咽宽度的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 May;22(5):302-6.
3
Comparison between Growth Patterns and Pharyngeal Widths in Different Skeletal Malocclusions in South Indian Population.南印度人群不同骨骼错颌畸形的生长模式与咽宽度的比较。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 May-Jun;8(3):224-228. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_77_18. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
Cephalometric changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional treatment with twin block versus myobrace appliances in developing skeletal class II patients: a randomized clinical trial.功能性治疗双板与肌激动器对发育性骨性Ⅱ类错(牙合)患者咽气道形态影响的头影测量研究:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):998. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03701-9.
5
A Study on the Evaluation of Pharyngeal Size in Different Skeletal Patterns: A Radiographic Study.不同骨骼类型下咽腔大小评估的研究:一项影像学研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Oct 1;19(10):1278-1283.
6
Comparison of airway dimensions in skeletal Class I malocclusion subjects with different vertical facial patterns.不同垂直面型的安氏I类错颌患者气道尺寸的比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Nov-Dec;22(6):35-42. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.6.035-042.oar.
7
Vertical and sagittal morphology of the facial skeleton and the pharyngeal airway.面部骨骼及咽部气道的垂直和矢状形态
Stomatologija. 2016;18(1):21-5.
8
Upper and lower pharyngeal airways in subjects with Class I and Class II malocclusions and different growth patterns.I类和II类错牙合畸形及不同生长模式受试者的上、下咽气道
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Dec;130(6):742-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.033.
9
Correlation of Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions with Maxillomandibular Skeletal Relation and Mandibular Morphology in Subjects with Skeletal Class I and Class II Malocclusions and Different Growth Patterns: A Cephalometric Study in Selected Local Population.骨骼I类和II类错牙合及不同生长模式患者的咽气道尺寸与上下颌骨骨骼关系及下颌形态的相关性:对特定当地人群的头影测量研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1111-S1114. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_349_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
10
Upper and lower pharyngeal airway space in West-Tamil Nadu population.西泰米尔纳德邦人群的上、下咽气道空间
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S539-42. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163532.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Upper Airway Width and Facial Height Cephalometric Parameters in Adult Caucasians with Skeletal Class I and Class III Malocclusion.成年高加索人骨骼I类和III类错牙合患者上气道宽度和面部高度头影测量参数的评估
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 6;61(3):463. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030463.
2
Three-dimensional evaluation of the association between tongue position and upper airway morphology in adults: A cross-sectional study.成人舌位置与上气道形态关联的三维评估:一项横断面研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2023 Sep 25;53(5):317-327. doi: 10.4041/kjod23.019.

本文引用的文献

1
Vertical and sagittal morphology of the facial skeleton and the pharyngeal airway.面部骨骼及咽部气道的垂直和矢状形态
Stomatologija. 2016;18(1):21-5.
2
Sleep and airway assessment: A review for dentists.睡眠与气道评估:牙科医生综述
Cranio. 2017 Jul;35(4):206-222. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2016.1228440. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
3
Relationship of craniofacial morphology in 3-dimensional analysis of the pharynx.咽部三维分析中颅面形态的关系
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 May;149(5):683-691.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.021.
4
Anatomy and physiology of respiratory system relevant to anaesthesia.与麻醉相关的呼吸系统解剖学与生理学
Indian J Anaesth. 2015 Sep;59(9):533-41. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.165849.
5
Soft tissue airway dimensions and craniocervical posture in subjects with different growth patterns.不同生长模式受试者的软组织气道尺寸和颅颈姿势。
Angle Orthod. 2015 Jul;85(4):604-10. doi: 10.2319/042314-299.1. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
6
Gross anatomical observations of attachments of the middle pharyngeal constrictor.咽中缩肌附着的大体解剖观察
Clin Anat. 2014 May;27(4):603-9. doi: 10.1002/ca.22344. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
7
Recent developments in United airways disease.美国航空公司疾病的最新进展。
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2012 Jul;4(4):171-7. doi: 10.4168/aair.2012.4.4.171. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
8
Comparison of different craniofacial patterns with pharyngeal widths.不同颅面模式与咽宽度的比较。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012 May;22(5):302-6.
9
Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with Class I malocclusion and different growth patterns.骨性Ⅰ类错合不同生长型患者口颌面气道的测量研究。
Angle Orthod. 2011 May;81(3):460-8. doi: 10.2319/091910-545.1. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
10
Validity of upper airway assessment in children: a clinical, cephalometric, and MRI study.上呼吸道评估在儿童中的有效性:一项临床、头影测量和 MRI 研究。
Angle Orthod. 2011 May;81(3):433-9. doi: 10.2319/063010-362.1. Epub 2011 Jan 24.