• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较巴洛沙韦与神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗的流感门诊患者的住院发生率:一项医疗保险索赔数据库研究。

Comparison of Hospitalization Incidence in Influenza Outpatients Treated With Baloxavir Marboxil or Neuraminidase Inhibitors: A Health Insurance Claims Database Study.

机构信息

PMS & Pharmacoepidemiology Department, Shionogi Pharmacovigilance Center Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):e1181-e1190. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1870.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa1870
PMID:33354728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8423480/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) is a single-dose, oral antiinfluenza drug with a novel mechanism of action. We compared the incidence of hospitalization in patients treated with baloxavir vs neuraminidase inhibitors.

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational, cohort study, we used real-world patient data extracted from a Japanese health insurance claims database. The enrollment period was 1 October 2018 to 17 April 2019. On day 1, eligible patients (N = 339 007) received baloxavir, oseltamivir, zanamivir, or laninamivir. Baseline characteristics were standardized using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The primary end point was the incidence of hospitalization (days 2-14). Secondary end points included antibacterial use, secondary pneumonia, and additional antiinfluenza drug use.

RESULTS

Compared with the baloxavir group, the incidence of hospitalization was greater in the oseltamivir group (risk ratio [RR] and 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 [1.00-2.00]; risk difference [RD] and 95% CI, 0.06 [.01-.12]) and zanamivir group (RR, 1.85 [1.23-2.78]; RD, 0.11 [.02-.20]). Oseltamivir-treated patients were less likely to require antibacterials than baloxavir-treated patients (RR, 0.87 [.82-.91]). However, oseltamivir-treated patients were more likely to be hospitalized with antibacterials (RR, 1.70 [1.21-2.38]) or antibacterial injection (RR, 1.67 [1.17-2.38]) than baloxavir-treated patients (post hoc analysis). Compared with baloxavir-treated patients, additional antiinfluenza drug use was greater in oseltamivir-, zanamivir-, and laninamivir-treated patients (RR, 1.51 [1.05-2.18], 2.84 [2.04-3.96], and 1.68 [1.35-2.10], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Baloxavir is an efficacious antiinfluenza treatment that may reduce hospitalization compared with oseltamivir and zanamivir.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000038159).

摘要

背景

巴洛沙韦马波西利(baloxavir marboxil,baloxavir)是一种具有新型作用机制的单剂量口服抗流感药物。我们比较了巴洛沙韦与神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗患者的住院发生率。

方法

在这项回顾性、观察性队列研究中,我们使用了从日本健康保险索赔数据库中提取的真实患者数据。入组时间为 2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 17 日。第 1 天,符合条件的患者(N=339007 人)接受了巴洛沙韦、奥司他韦、扎那米韦或拉尼米韦治疗。使用逆概率治疗加权法对基线特征进行了标准化。主要终点是住院(第 2-14 天)的发生率。次要终点包括抗菌药物使用、继发性肺炎和额外的抗流感药物使用。

结果

与巴洛沙韦组相比,奥司他韦组(风险比[RR]和 95%置信区间[CI],1.41[1.00-2.00];风险差[RD]和 95%CI,0.06[0.01-0.12])和扎那米韦组(RR,1.85[1.23-2.78];RD,0.11[0.02-0.20])的住院发生率更高。与巴洛沙韦组相比,奥司他韦治疗组更不可能需要抗菌药物(RR,0.87[0.82-0.91])。然而,与巴洛沙韦治疗组相比,奥司他韦治疗组因需要抗菌药物(RR,1.70[1.21-2.38])或抗菌药物注射(RR,1.67[1.17-2.38])而住院的可能性更高(事后分析)。与巴洛沙韦治疗组相比,奥司他韦、扎那米韦和拉尼米韦治疗组的额外抗流感药物使用更多(RR,1.51[1.05-2.18]、2.84[2.04-3.96]和 1.68[1.35-2.10])。

结论

巴洛沙韦是一种有效的抗流感治疗药物,与奥司他韦和扎那米韦相比,可能降低住院率。

临床试验注册

大学医院医学信息网临床试验注册(UMIN000038159)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f0/8423480/fcdf0ec053e9/ciaa1870f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f0/8423480/610323d80ed4/ciaa1870f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f0/8423480/3acc1d188f3e/ciaa1870f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f0/8423480/e8f31ff85274/ciaa1870f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f0/8423480/fcdf0ec053e9/ciaa1870f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f0/8423480/610323d80ed4/ciaa1870f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f0/8423480/3acc1d188f3e/ciaa1870f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f0/8423480/e8f31ff85274/ciaa1870f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f0/8423480/fcdf0ec053e9/ciaa1870f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Hospitalization Incidence in Influenza Outpatients Treated With Baloxavir Marboxil or Neuraminidase Inhibitors: A Health Insurance Claims Database Study.比较巴洛沙韦与神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗的流感门诊患者的住院发生率:一项医疗保险索赔数据库研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):e1181-e1190. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1870.
2
Comparison of Household Transmission of Influenza Virus From Index Patients Treated With Baloxavir Marboxil or Neuraminidase Inhibitors: A Health Insurance Claims Database Study.比较使用巴洛沙韦或神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗的流感患者的家庭传播:一项医疗保险索赔数据库研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;72(11):e859-e867. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1622.
3
A Comparison of the Frequency of Prescription and Pharmacy Revisits between Baloxavir Marboxil and Neuraminidase Inhibitors in Influenza-Infected Pediatric Patients during the 2019-2020 Influenza Season.2019-2020 流感季中,流感感染患儿中使用巴洛沙韦和神经氨酸酶抑制剂的处方和药房复诊频率比较。
Biol Pharm Bull. 2020;43(12):1960-1965. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b20-00543.
4
Comparison of the incidence of bleeding between baloxavir marboxil and other anti-influenza drugs among outpatients with influenza virus infection: A retrospective cohort study using an employment-based health insurance claims database in Japan.比较巴洛沙韦与其他抗流感药物在日本以就业为基础的医疗保险理赔数据库中门诊流感病毒感染患者出血发生率的一项回顾性队列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):623-631. doi: 10.1002/pds.5392. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
Duration of fever in children infected with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) or B virus and treated with baloxavir marboxil, oseltamivir, laninamivir, or zanamivir in Japan during the 2012-2013 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons.在 2012-2013 年和 2019-2020 年流感季节期间,在日本感染了甲型流感病毒(H1N1)pdm09、(H3N2)或乙型流感病毒的儿童,使用巴洛沙韦、奥司他韦、扎那米韦或拉尼米韦治疗后发热持续时间。
Antiviral Res. 2024 Aug;228:105938. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2024.105938. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
6
Virological and clinical outcomes in outpatients treated with baloxavir or oseltamivir: A Japanese multicenter study in the 2019-2020 influenza season.巴洛沙韦或奥司他韦治疗门诊患者的病毒学和临床结局:2019 - 2020年流感季节日本多中心研究。
Antiviral Res. 2021 Aug;192:105092. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2021.105092. Epub 2021 May 27.
7
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Baloxavir and Oseltamivir in Outpatients With Influenza B.比较巴洛沙韦和奥司他韦在流感 B 门诊患者中的疗效。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Sep;18(9):e70002. doi: 10.1111/irv.70002.
8
Comparison of Antiviral Agents for Seasonal Influenza Outcomes in Healthy Adults and Children: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.健康成人和儿童季节性流感治疗中抗病毒药物的比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119151. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19151.
9
Baloxavir for the treatment of Influenza in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients previously treated with oseltamivir.巴洛沙韦治疗异基因造血干细胞移植受者流感:奥司他韦治疗后的疗效
Transpl Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;22(4):e13336. doi: 10.1111/tid.13336. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Baloxavir treatment of oseltamivir-resistant influenza A/H1pdm09 in two immunocompromised patients.两例免疫功能低下的流感 A/H1pdm09 对奥司他韦耐药患者使用巴洛沙韦治疗。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;23(3):e13542. doi: 10.1111/tid.13542. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Virologic Outcomes of Baloxavir Compared with Oseltamivir in Pediatric Patients with Influenza in Japan.在日本流感患儿中,巴洛沙韦与奥司他韦的临床和病毒学结局比较
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Apr;14(4):833-846. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01131-4. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Baloxavir and Oseltamivir in Outpatients With Influenza B.比较巴洛沙韦和奥司他韦在流感 B 门诊患者中的疗效。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Sep;18(9):e70002. doi: 10.1111/irv.70002.
3
Real-world effectiveness and safety of Baloxavir Marboxil or Oseltamivir in outpatients with uncomplicated influenza A: an ambispective, observational, multi-center study.
巴洛沙韦酯或奥司他韦在非复杂性甲型流感门诊患者中的真实世界有效性和安全性:一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jul 23;15:1428095. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1428095. eCollection 2024.
4
Real-World Effectiveness of Ensitrelvir in Reducing Severe Outcomes in Outpatients at High Risk for COVID-19.恩昔瑞韦对降低COVID-19高风险门诊患者严重结局的真实世界有效性
Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Aug;13(8):1821-1833. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01010-4. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
5
Factors Associated With the Development of Bacterial Pneumonia Related to Seasonal Influenza Virus Infection: A Study Using a Large-scale Health Insurance Claim Database.与季节性流感病毒感染相关的细菌性肺炎发生的相关因素:一项使用大规模健康保险理赔数据库的研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 21;10(5):ofad222. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad222. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Influenza antivirals and their role in pandemic preparedness.流感抗病毒药物及其在大流行准备中的作用。
Antiviral Res. 2023 Feb;210:105499. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2022.105499. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
7
Baloxavir Treatment Delays Influenza B Virus Transmission in Ferrets and Results in Limited Generation of Drug-Resistant Variants.巴洛沙韦治疗延缓雪貂中乙型流感病毒的传播,并导致耐药变异株的有限产生。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Oct 18;65(11):e0113721. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01137-21. Epub 2021 Aug 23.