• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较巴洛沙韦和奥司他韦在流感 B 门诊患者中的疗效。

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Baloxavir and Oseltamivir in Outpatients With Influenza B.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Sep;18(9):e70002. doi: 10.1111/irv.70002.

DOI:10.1111/irv.70002
PMID:39189087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11347862/
Abstract

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from a Japanese health insurance database to assess the effectiveness of baloxavir (n = 4822) for preventing severe events compared with oseltamivir (n = 10,523) in patients with influenza B. The primary endpoint was hospitalization incidence (Days 2-14). The secondary endpoints included intravenous antibacterial drug use, pneumonia hospitalization, heart failure hospitalization, inhalational oxygen requirement, and use of other anti-influenza drugs. The hospitalization incidence was significantly lower with baloxavir (0.15% vs. 0.37%; risk ratio: 2.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-5.43). Pneumonia and additional anti-influenza therapy were also less frequent with baloxavir, thus supporting its use. Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Study ID: UMIN000051382.

摘要

本回顾性队列研究分析了来自日本医保数据库的数据,以评估巴洛沙韦(n=4822)与奥司他韦(n=10523)相比在预防流感 B 患者发生严重事件方面的有效性。主要终点为住院发生率(第 2-14 天)。次要终点包括静脉用抗菌药物使用、肺炎住院、心力衰竭住院、吸入氧气需求以及其他抗流感药物的使用。巴洛沙韦的住院发生率显著更低(0.15% vs. 0.37%;风险比:2.48,95%置信区间:1.13-5.43)。肺炎和其他抗流感治疗的发生频率也较低,因此支持使用巴洛沙韦。试验注册:UMIN 临床试验注册研究 ID:UMIN000051382。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd29/11347862/581864dee4a6/IRV-18-e70002-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd29/11347862/d6d229b23ea8/IRV-18-e70002-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd29/11347862/581864dee4a6/IRV-18-e70002-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd29/11347862/d6d229b23ea8/IRV-18-e70002-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd29/11347862/581864dee4a6/IRV-18-e70002-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Baloxavir and Oseltamivir in Outpatients With Influenza B.比较巴洛沙韦和奥司他韦在流感 B 门诊患者中的疗效。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Sep;18(9):e70002. doi: 10.1111/irv.70002.
2
Incidence of severe illness in pediatric influenza outpatients treated with baloxavir or neuraminidase inhibitors.接受巴洛沙韦或神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗的儿科流感门诊患者中的重症发病率。
J Infect Chemother. 2025 Mar;31(3):102606. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2025.102606. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
Comparison of Hospitalization Incidence in Influenza Outpatients Treated With Baloxavir Marboxil or Neuraminidase Inhibitors: A Health Insurance Claims Database Study.比较巴洛沙韦与神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗的流感门诊患者的住院发生率:一项医疗保险索赔数据库研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):e1181-e1190. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1870.
4
Virological and Clinical Outcomes of Influenza Outpatients Treated With Baloxavir, Oseltamivir, or Laninamivir in the 2023-2024 Season.2023-2024 年度流感门诊患者使用巴洛沙韦、奥司他韦或拉尼米韦的病毒学和临床结局。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Nov;18(11):e70042. doi: 10.1111/irv.70042.
5
Virological and clinical outcomes in outpatients treated with baloxavir or oseltamivir: A Japanese multicenter study in the 2019-2020 influenza season.巴洛沙韦或奥司他韦治疗门诊患者的病毒学和临床结局:2019 - 2020年流感季节日本多中心研究。
Antiviral Res. 2021 Aug;192:105092. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2021.105092. Epub 2021 May 27.
6
Duration of fever in children infected with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) or B virus and treated with baloxavir marboxil, oseltamivir, laninamivir, or zanamivir in Japan during the 2012-2013 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons.在 2012-2013 年和 2019-2020 年流感季节期间,在日本感染了甲型流感病毒(H1N1)pdm09、(H3N2)或乙型流感病毒的儿童,使用巴洛沙韦、奥司他韦、扎那米韦或拉尼米韦治疗后发热持续时间。
Antiviral Res. 2024 Aug;228:105938. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2024.105938. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
7
Clinical efficacy and safety of baloxavir marboxil in the treatment of influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.巴洛沙韦治疗流感的临床疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021 Oct;54(5):865-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
8
Adverse events associated with oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil in against influenza virus therapy: A pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database.奥司他韦和玛巴洛沙韦联合治疗抗流感病毒的不良反应:利用 FAERS 数据库进行的药物警戒研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 13;19(11):e0308998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308998. eCollection 2024.
9
Duration of fever and symptoms in children after treatment with baloxavir marboxil and oseltamivir during the 2018-2019 season and detection of variant influenza a viruses with polymerase acidic subunit substitutions.2018-2019 季节使用巴洛沙韦和奥司他韦治疗后儿童的发热和症状持续时间,以及聚合酶酸性亚基替换的变异流感 A 病毒的检测。
Antiviral Res. 2020 Nov;183:104951. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104951. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
10
Clinical and virological outcomes with baloxavir compared with oseltamivir in pediatric patients aged 6 to < 12 years with influenza: an open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial protocol.儿童患者(6 至<12 岁)流感患者中比奥司他韦相比巴洛沙韦的临床和病毒学结局:一项开放标签、随机、活性对照试验方案。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 9;21(1):777. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06494-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Influenza Treatments in Japan Using a Transmission Model: The Impact of Baloxavir and Oseltamivir Shares.使用传播模型对日本流感治疗进行成本效益分析:巴洛沙韦和奥司他韦份额的影响
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01203-5.
2
Clinical and Virologic Outcomes of Baloxavir Compared with Oseltamivir in Pediatric Patients with Influenza in Japan.在日本流感患儿中,巴洛沙韦与奥司他韦的临床和病毒学结局比较
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Apr;14(4):833-846. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01131-4. Epub 2025 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical effectiveness of baloxavir marboxil against influenza in three seasons.三季中玛巴洛沙韦对流感的临床疗效。
Pediatr Int. 2022 Jan;64(1):e15169. doi: 10.1111/ped.15169.
2
Oseltamivir treatment of influenza A and B infections in infants.奥司他韦治疗婴幼儿甲型和乙型流感感染。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2021 Sep;15(5):618-624. doi: 10.1111/irv.12862. Epub 2021 May 3.
3
Comparison of Hospitalization Incidence in Influenza Outpatients Treated With Baloxavir Marboxil or Neuraminidase Inhibitors: A Health Insurance Claims Database Study.
比较巴洛沙韦与神经氨酸酶抑制剂治疗的流感门诊患者的住院发生率:一项医疗保险索赔数据库研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):e1181-e1190. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1870.
4
Burden of influenza B virus infection and considerations for clinical management.乙型流感病毒感染负担及临床管理注意事项。
Antiviral Res. 2021 Jan;185:104970. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104970. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Early treatment with baloxavir marboxil in high-risk adolescent and adult outpatients with uncomplicated influenza (CAPSTONE-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.在有流感并发症风险的青少年和成年门诊患者中早期使用巴洛沙韦治疗(CAPSTONE-2):一项随机、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1204-1214. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30004-9. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
6
A nationwide questionnaire survey of clinic doctors on antimicrobial stewardship in Japan.日本全国范围内临床医生抗菌药物管理情况的问卷调查。
J Infect Chemother. 2020 Feb;26(2):149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.12.005. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
7
In vitro characterization of baloxavir acid, a first-in-class cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor of the influenza virus polymerase PA subunit.体外鉴定巴洛沙韦酸:一种新型流感病毒聚合酶 PA 亚单位依赖帽结构的内切核酸酶抑制剂。
Antiviral Res. 2018 Dec;160:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
8
Baloxavir: First Global Approval.巴洛沙韦:全球首次获批
Drugs. 2018 Apr;78(6):693-697. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0899-1.
9
Japanese Surveillance Systems and Treatment for Influenza.日本的流感监测系统与治疗
Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2016;8(4):311-328. doi: 10.1007/s40506-016-0085-5. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
10
Healthcare Databases in Thailand and Japan: Potential Sources for Health Technology Assessment Research.泰国和日本的医疗保健数据库:卫生技术评估研究的潜在来源。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 11;10(11):e0141993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141993. eCollection 2015.