Chen L, Zheng Y, Min L, Dong S M
Department of Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Disease of Women and Children, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 25;55(12):843-847. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200309-00193.
To study the safety and feasibility of total hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery (TU-LESS). The study was a retrospective cohort analysis. In West China Second University Hospital, from October 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019, the patients with an indication for hysterectomy due to benign uterine diseases were enrolled, and were grouped by the surgical procedure. Various post-operative surgical outcomes, including the success rate of operation, uterine volume, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, the first time of flatus, the preserved time of catheter after operation, and the length of hospitalization were measured. The data were assessed by the software of SPSS. Totally 30 patients were included in the vNOTES group, and 77 patients were included in the TU-LESS group, all of the procedures were completed successfully without conversion to traditional multiport laparoscopy or laparotomy. Non differences were observed between two groups, including uterine volume [(165±36) vs (235±38) cm, =0.243], operation time [(150±41) vs (169±48) minutes, =0.063], blood loss [(54±15) vs (54±14) ml, =0.985], the rate of intraoperative complications [3% (1/30) vs 4% (2/77), =1.000], the rate of postoperative complications [13% (4/30) vs 4% (3/77), =0.095] and the rate of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy [50% (15/30) vs 31% (24/77), =0.069]. Patients in the vNOTES group had significantly less recovery time of intestine function [(1.7±0.5) vs (2.3±0.6) days, =0.001], shorter time of indwelling catheter [(1.9±0.4) vs (2.3±0.6) days, =0.004], and duration of hospitalization [(3.2±0.8) vs (3.6±0.9) days, =0.045]. vNOTES and TU-LESS are both safe and feasible for total hysterectomy. Compared with TU-LESS, vNOTES may be a promising approach with earlier recovery, less injury and better cosmetic.
研究经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)和经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(TU-LESS)行全子宫切除术的安全性和可行性。本研究为回顾性队列分析。在华西第二医院,选取2018年10月1日至2019年6月30日因良性子宫疾病有子宫切除指征的患者,按手术方式分组。测量各种术后手术结局,包括手术成功率、子宫体积、手术时间、失血量、术中并发症、术后并发症、首次排气时间、术后留置导尿管时间及住院时间。数据采用SPSS软件进行评估。vNOTES组共纳入30例患者,TU-LESS组共纳入77例患者,所有手术均顺利完成,未转为传统多孔腹腔镜手术或开腹手术。两组间未见差异,包括子宫体积[(165±36) vs (235±38)cm³,P =0.243]、手术时间[(150±41) vs (169±48)分钟,P =0.063]、失血量[(54±15) vs (54±14)ml,P =0.985]、术中并发症发生率[3%(1/30) vs 4%(2/77),P =1.000]、术后并发症发生率[13%(4/30) vs 4%(3/77),P =0.095]及双侧输卵管卵巢切除术发生率[50%(15/30) vs 31%(24/77),P =0.069]。vNOTES组患者肠道功能恢复时间显著缩短[(1.7±0.5) vs (2.3±0.6)天,P =0.001],留置导尿管时间缩短[(1.9±0.4) vs (2.3±0.6)天,P =0.004],住院时间缩短[(3.2±0.8) vs (3.6±0.9)天,P =0.045]。vNOTES和TU-LESS行全子宫切除术均安全可行。与TU-LESS相比,vNOTES可能是一种更有前景的方法,恢复更快,损伤更小,美容效果更好。