Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Sep;288:211-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
We investigated quality of life (QOL) of patients who underwent total hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases using two surgical approaches: robotic-transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (R-vNOTES) and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH).
This single-center retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary academic setting and included 65 patients who underwent robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases. Total hysterectomy was performed using R-vNOTES or RALH by the same gynecologist between December 2021 and June 2022. The primary outcome was a comparison of QOL over time and complete QOL recovery (postoperative QOL score/preoperative QOL score ≥ 1) by postoperative day 28 (POD28) in the R-vNOTES and RALH groups. QOL was examined using EQ-5D-5L in this study. The secondary outcome was a comparison of the surgical outcomes in the R-vNOTES and RALH groups.
Complete QOL recovery was achieved by 62.7% in the R-vNOTES group and 7.3% in the RALH group at POD7 (p <.001) and by 100% in the R-vNOTES group and 56.1% in the RALH group at POD28 (p <.001). In a multivariable model, patients who underwent R-vNOTES achieved higher complete QOL recovery at POD 28 [adjusted hazard ratio: 4.03, 95% confidence interval: 2.03-8.04]. There was no significant difference between the R-vNOTES and RALH groups in terms of operating time (p =.07), intraoperative blood loss (p =.35), uterus weight (p =.76), or postoperative complications (p =.71).
The R-vNOTES approach for total hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases provided better complete QOL recovery by POD28 compared to the RALH approach. The surgical outcomes for R-vNOTES were equivalent to those for RALH, suggesting that R-vNOTES may provide a safe approach for robot-assisted hysterectomy.
我们研究了通过两种手术方式(经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人辅助与机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术)治疗良性子宫疾病的患者的生活质量(QOL)。
本单中心回顾性研究在一家三级学术机构进行,纳入 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 6 月期间由同一位妇科医生采用经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人辅助与机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性子宫疾病的 65 例患者。采用经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人辅助或机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术行全子宫切除术。主要结局是比较 R-vNOTES 和 RALH 组患者的 QOL 随时间的变化以及术后第 28 天(POD28)的完全 QOL 恢复情况(术后 QOL 评分/术前 QOL 评分≥1)。该研究采用 EQ-5D-5L 评估 QOL。次要结局是比较 R-vNOTES 和 RALH 组的手术结果。
R-vNOTES 组在 POD7 时完全 QOL 恢复率为 62.7%,RALH 组为 7.3%(p<0.001),在 POD28 时 R-vNOTES 组为 100%,RALH 组为 56.1%(p<0.001)。多变量模型显示,R-vNOTES 组患者在术后第 28 天的完全 QOL 恢复率更高[调整后的危险比:4.03,95%置信区间:2.03-8.04]。在手术时间(p=0.07)、术中出血量(p=0.35)、子宫重量(p=0.76)或术后并发症(p=0.71)方面,R-vNOTES 组与 RALH 组无显著差异。
与机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术相比,经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人辅助治疗良性子宫疾病的全子宫切除术在术后第 28 天能更好地恢复完全 QOL。R-vNOTES 的手术结果与 RALH 相当,提示 R-vNOTES 可能为机器人辅助子宫切除术提供一种安全的方法。