• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术术后生活质量比较。

Comparison of quality of life after robotic-transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.

机构信息

Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Sep;288:211-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.003
PMID:37572450
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We investigated quality of life (QOL) of patients who underwent total hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases using two surgical approaches: robotic-transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (R-vNOTES) and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH).

STUDY DESIGN

This single-center retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary academic setting and included 65 patients who underwent robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases. Total hysterectomy was performed using R-vNOTES or RALH by the same gynecologist between December 2021 and June 2022. The primary outcome was a comparison of QOL over time and complete QOL recovery (postoperative QOL score/preoperative QOL score ≥ 1) by postoperative day 28 (POD28) in the R-vNOTES and RALH groups. QOL was examined using EQ-5D-5L in this study. The secondary outcome was a comparison of the surgical outcomes in the R-vNOTES and RALH groups.

RESULTS

Complete QOL recovery was achieved by 62.7% in the R-vNOTES group and 7.3% in the RALH group at POD7 (p <.001) and by 100% in the R-vNOTES group and 56.1% in the RALH group at POD28 (p <.001). In a multivariable model, patients who underwent R-vNOTES achieved higher complete QOL recovery at POD 28 [adjusted hazard ratio: 4.03, 95% confidence interval: 2.03-8.04]. There was no significant difference between the R-vNOTES and RALH groups in terms of operating time (p =.07), intraoperative blood loss (p =.35), uterus weight (p =.76), or postoperative complications (p =.71).

CONCLUSION

The R-vNOTES approach for total hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases provided better complete QOL recovery by POD28 compared to the RALH approach. The surgical outcomes for R-vNOTES were equivalent to those for RALH, suggesting that R-vNOTES may provide a safe approach for robot-assisted hysterectomy.

摘要

目的

我们研究了通过两种手术方式(经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人辅助与机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术)治疗良性子宫疾病的患者的生活质量(QOL)。

研究设计

本单中心回顾性研究在一家三级学术机构进行,纳入 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 6 月期间由同一位妇科医生采用经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人辅助与机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性子宫疾病的 65 例患者。采用经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人辅助或机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术行全子宫切除术。主要结局是比较 R-vNOTES 和 RALH 组患者的 QOL 随时间的变化以及术后第 28 天(POD28)的完全 QOL 恢复情况(术后 QOL 评分/术前 QOL 评分≥1)。该研究采用 EQ-5D-5L 评估 QOL。次要结局是比较 R-vNOTES 和 RALH 组的手术结果。

结果

R-vNOTES 组在 POD7 时完全 QOL 恢复率为 62.7%,RALH 组为 7.3%(p<0.001),在 POD28 时 R-vNOTES 组为 100%,RALH 组为 56.1%(p<0.001)。多变量模型显示,R-vNOTES 组患者在术后第 28 天的完全 QOL 恢复率更高[调整后的危险比:4.03,95%置信区间:2.03-8.04]。在手术时间(p=0.07)、术中出血量(p=0.35)、子宫重量(p=0.76)或术后并发症(p=0.71)方面,R-vNOTES 组与 RALH 组无显著差异。

结论

与机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术相比,经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人辅助治疗良性子宫疾病的全子宫切除术在术后第 28 天能更好地恢复完全 QOL。R-vNOTES 的手术结果与 RALH 相当,提示 R-vNOTES 可能为机器人辅助子宫切除术提供一种安全的方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of quality of life after robotic-transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术术后生活质量比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Sep;288:211-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Robotic-assisted vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted single-site port for benign hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.机器人辅助阴道自然腔道内镜手术与机器人辅助单孔端口用于良性子宫切除术:手术结果比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2487-2494. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01680-1. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Surgical Outcomes of Hysterectomy via Robot-assisted versus Traditional Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery.机器人辅助与传统经阴道自然腔道内镜手术行子宫切除术的手术结局。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Dec;28(12):2028-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人子宫肌瘤剔除术。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug;118(2):414-416. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
5
Perioperative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in hysterectomy: A comparative study.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与经脐腹腔镜单部位手术治疗子宫切除术的围手术期结局比较:一项对照研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;165(3):1151-1157. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15323. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
6
Surgical outcomes of hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) compared with laparoscopic total hysterectomy (LTH) in women with non-prolapsed and benign uterine diseases.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)与腹腔镜全子宫切除术(LTH)治疗非脱垂良性子宫疾病患者的手术结局比较。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;59(4):565-569. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.05.016.
7
Evaluation of the learning curve and safety outcomes in robotic assisted vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy: A case series of 84 patients.机器人辅助经阴道自然腔道内镜下子宫切除术学习曲线及安全性结果评估:84例病例系列研究
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Jun;18(3):e2385. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2385. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
8
Robotic Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.机器人阴道自然腔道经内镜子宫切除术用于良性适应证。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 May;28(5):1101-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.10.021. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
9
[Clinical cohort study of total hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery].经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与经脐单孔腹腔镜手术行全子宫切除术的临床队列研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 25;55(12):843-847. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200309-00193.
10
Hysterectomy Using Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Compared with Classic Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A New Advantageous Approach? A Systematic Review on Surgical Outcomes.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗子宫疾病的比较:一种新的有利方法?手术结局的系统评价。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2023;88(4):187-196. doi: 10.1159/000530797. Epub 2023 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The feasibility and surgical outcomes of robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic single port hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人经阴道自然腔道内镜单孔子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的可行性及手术效果:一项系统评价与Meta分析
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 May 14;5(3):100512. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100512. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
The Feasibility and Safety of Robot-Assisted Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (RA-vNOTES) for Gynecologic Disease: 298-Case Series.机器人辅助经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(RA-vNOTES)治疗妇科疾病的可行性与安全性:298例病例系列研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 25;13(7):720. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070720.