Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England.
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216520972860. doi: 10.1177/2331216520972860.
The acoustic reflex (AR) shows promise as an objective test for the presence of cochlear synaptopathy in rodents. The AR has also been shown to be reduced in humans with tinnitus compared to those without. The aim of the present study was twofold: (a) to determine if AR strength (quantified as both threshold and growth) varied with lifetime noise exposure, and thus provided an estimate of the degree of synaptopathy and (b) to identify which factors should be considered when using the AR as a quantitative measure rather than just present/absent responses. AR thresholds and growth functions were measured using ipsilateral and contralateral, broadband and tonal elicitors in adults with normal hearing and varying levels of lifetime noise exposure. Only the clinical standard 226 Hz probe tone was used. AR threshold and growth were not related to lifetime noise exposure, suggesting that routine clinical AR measures are not a sensitive measure when investigating the effects of noise exposure in audiometrically normal listeners. Our secondary, exploratory analyses revealed that AR threshold and growth were significantly related to middle-ear compliance. Listeners with higher middle-ear compliance (though still in the clinically normal range) showed lower AR thresholds and steeper AR growth functions. Furthermore, there was a difference in middle-ear compliance between the sexes, with males showing higher middle-ear compliance values than females. Therefore, it may be necessary to factor middle-ear compliance values into any analysis that uses the AR as an estimate of auditory function.
声反射(AR)有望成为一种客观测试方法,用于检测啮齿动物耳蜗突触病的存在。研究还表明,与没有耳鸣的人相比,患有耳鸣的人的 AR 也会降低。本研究的目的有两个:(a)确定 AR 强度(通过阈值和增长来量化)是否随终生噪声暴露而变化,从而提供突触病程度的估计;(b)确定在将 AR 用作定量测量时,应考虑哪些因素,而不仅仅是出现/未出现的反应。在听力正常且终生噪声暴露水平不同的成年人中,使用同侧和对侧、宽带和音调激发源测量 AR 阈值和增长函数。仅使用临床标准的 226Hz 探测音。AR 阈值和增长与终生噪声暴露无关,这表明常规临床 AR 测量在研究听力正常的听众中噪声暴露的影响时不是一种敏感的测量方法。我们的二次探索性分析表明,AR 阈值和增长与中耳顺应性显著相关。中耳顺应性较高(尽管仍在临床正常范围内)的听众的 AR 阈值较低,AR 增长函数较陡。此外,男女之间的中耳顺应性存在差异,男性的中耳顺应性值高于女性。因此,在使用 AR 作为听觉功能估计值的任何分析中,可能需要将中耳顺应性值纳入分析。