• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种广泛应用于 COVID-19 住院患者的专有恶化指数模型。

Evaluating a Widely Implemented Proprietary Deterioration Index Model among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Learning Health Sciences.

Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Jul;18(7):1129-1137. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-698OC.

DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-698OC
PMID:33357088
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8328366/
Abstract

The Epic Deterioration Index (EDI) is a proprietary prediction model implemented in over 100 U.S. hospitals that was widely used to support medical decision-making during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The EDI has not been independently evaluated, and other proprietary models have been shown to be biased against vulnerable populations. To independently evaluate the EDI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 overall and in disproportionately affected subgroups. We studied adult patients admitted with COVID-19 to units other than the intensive care unit at a large academic medical center from March 9 through May 20, 2020. We used the EDI, calculated at 15-minute intervals, to predict a composite outcome of intensive care unit-level care, mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital death. In a subset of patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours, we also evaluated the ability of the EDI to identify patients at low risk of experiencing this composite outcome during their remaining hospitalization. Among 392 COVID-19 hospitalizations meeting inclusion criteria, 103 (26%) met the composite outcome. The median age of the cohort was 64 (interquartile range, 53-75) with 168 (43%) Black patients and 169 (43%) women. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the EDI was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.84). EDI predictions did not differ by race or sex. When exploring clinically relevant thresholds of the EDI, we found patients who met or exceeded an EDI of 68.8 made up 14% of the study cohort and had a 74% probability of experiencing the composite outcome during their hospitalization with a sensitivity of 39% and a median lead time of 24 hours from when this threshold was first exceeded. Among the 286 patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours who had not experienced the composite outcome, 14 (13%) never exceeded an EDI of 37.9, with a negative predictive value of 90% and a sensitivity above this threshold of 91%. We found the EDI identifies small subsets of high-risk and low-risk patients with COVID-19 with good discrimination, although its clinical use as an early warning system is limited by low sensitivity. These findings highlight the importance of independent evaluation of proprietary models before widespread operational use among patients with COVID-19.

摘要

《史诗恶化指数(EDI)》是一种专有的预测模型,已在美国 100 多家医院实施,在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间被广泛用于支持医疗决策。该模型尚未经过独立评估,其他专有模型已被证明对弱势群体存在偏见。

本研究旨在独立评估 COVID-19 住院患者的 EDI 总体情况和受影响较大的亚组情况。

我们研究了 2020 年 3 月 9 日至 5 月 20 日期间,在一家大型学术医疗中心除重症监护病房外的其他科室因 COVID-19 住院的成年患者。我们使用 EDI(每 15 分钟计算一次)预测 ICU 级护理、机械通气或院内死亡的综合结局。在至少住院 48 小时的患者亚组中,我们还评估了 EDI 识别在剩余住院期间低风险经历该综合结局的患者的能力。

在符合纳入标准的 392 例 COVID-19 住院患者中,有 103 例(26%)符合复合结局。队列的中位年龄为 64 岁(四分位距 53-75 岁),其中 168 例(43%)为黑人患者,169 例(43%)为女性。EDI 的接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.79(95%置信区间 0.74-0.84)。EDI 预测不受种族或性别影响。在探索 EDI 的临床相关阈值时,我们发现符合或超过 EDI 68.8 的患者占研究队列的 14%,在住院期间发生复合结局的概率为 74%,其敏感性为 39%,中位领先时间为首次超过该阈值后 24 小时。在至少住院 48 小时且未发生复合结局的 286 例患者中,有 14 例(13%)从未超过 EDI 37.9,其阴性预测值为 90%,且该阈值以上的敏感性为 91%。

我们发现 EDI 可以很好地区分 COVID-19 的小部分高危和低危患者,尽管其作为早期预警系统的临床应用受到低敏感性的限制。这些发现强调了在 COVID-19 患者中广泛使用之前,对专有模型进行独立评估的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/aabf2f98afcb/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/f4b75c830a02/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/620236054bf8/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/08bb2b13b810/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/1f65756532c8/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/aabf2f98afcb/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/f4b75c830a02/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/620236054bf8/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/08bb2b13b810/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/1f65756532c8/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b04e/8328366/aabf2f98afcb/AnnalsATS.202006-698OCf5.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating a Widely Implemented Proprietary Deterioration Index Model among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.评估一种广泛应用于 COVID-19 住院患者的专有恶化指数模型。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Jul;18(7):1129-1137. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-698OC.
2
Evaluating a Widely Implemented Proprietary Deterioration Index Model Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.评估一种在住院的COVID-19患者中广泛应用的专有病情恶化指数模型。
medRxiv. 2020 Jun 20:2020.04.24.20079012. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.24.20079012.
3
Early Warning Scores With and Without Artificial Intelligence.早期预警评分与人工智能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438986. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38986.
4
External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients.在住院患者中验证广泛实施的专有脓毒症预测模型的外部有效性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1065-1070. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
6
Early identification of patients admitted to hospital for covid-19 at risk of clinical deterioration: model development and multisite external validation study.因 COVID-19 住院的患者临床恶化风险的早期识别:模型的建立与多中心外部验证研究。
BMJ. 2022 Feb 17;376:e068576. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068576.
7
Development and validation of the COVID-19 Hospitalized Patient Deterioration Index.COVID-19 住院患者恶化指数的制定与验证。
Am J Manag Care. 2023 Dec 1;29(12):e365-e371. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89470.
8
Development of a multivariate prediction model of intensive care unit transfer or death: A French prospective cohort study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.建立 ICU 转科或死亡的多变量预测模型:一项法国前瞻性队列研究COVID-19 住院患者。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 19;15(10):e0240711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240711. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparison of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who did and did not live in residential care facilities in Montréal: a retrospective case series.比较在蒙特利尔居住在和未居住在长期护理院的 COVID-19 住院患者:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jul 13;9(3):E718-E727. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200244. Print 2021 Jul-Sep.
10
Development of Severe COVID-19 Adaptive Risk Predictor (SCARP), a Calculator to Predict Severe Disease or Death in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.严重 COVID-19 适应性风险预测器(SCARP)的开发,是一种用于预测 COVID-19 住院患者发生严重疾病或死亡的计算器。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jun;174(6):777-785. doi: 10.7326/M20-6754. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in migrant health: a critical perspective on opportunities and risks.人工智能在移民健康中的应用:对机遇与风险的批判性视角
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Aug 8;57:101421. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101421. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Assessment of ChatGPT's adherence to EULAR diagnostic criteria and therapeutic protocols for rheumatoid arthritis at two distinct time points, 14 days apart, utilizing binary and multiple-choice inquiries.在两个相隔14天的不同时间点,利用二元和多项选择题,评估ChatGPT对欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)类风湿性关节炎诊断标准和治疗方案的遵循情况。
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Jun;44(6):2233-2239. doi: 10.1007/s10067-025-07417-9. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics Associated With Racial/Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes in an Academic Health Care System.在学术医疗体系中,与新冠疫情结果的种族/民族差异相关的特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025197. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25197.
2
Machine Learning in Clinical Journals: Moving From Inscrutable to Informative.临床期刊中的机器学习:从难以理解到提供信息
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Oct;13(10):e007491. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007491. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
3
Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area.
A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records.
一种使用纵向住院电子健康记录进行临床结局预测的深度学习模型。
JAMIA Open. 2025 Apr 10;8(2):ooaf026. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf026. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Real-time surveillance system for patient deterioration: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial.患者病情恶化实时监测系统:一项实用的整群随机对照试验。
Nat Med. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03609-7.
5
A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records.一种使用纵向住院电子健康记录进行临床结局预测的深度学习模型。
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 23:2025.01.21.25320916. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.21.25320916.
6
Performance of electronic medical record tool in predicting 6-month mortality in hospitalized patients with cancer.电子病历工具在预测癌症住院患者6个月死亡率方面的性能。
J Hosp Med. 2025 Aug;20(8):829-836. doi: 10.1002/jhm.70012. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
7
Emergency department early mortality model for patients admitted after presenting to a tertiary medical center emergency department.三级医疗中心急诊科就诊后入院患者的急诊科早期死亡模型
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jun;32(6):650-658. doi: 10.1111/acem.15096. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
8
Trustworthiness of a machine learning early warning model in medical and surgical inpatients.机器学习早期预警模型在内科和外科住院患者中的可信度。
JAMIA Open. 2025 Jan 6;8(1):ooae156. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae156. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
Addressing ethical issues in healthcare artificial intelligence using a lifecycle-informed process.使用基于生命周期的流程解决医疗保健人工智能中的伦理问题。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Nov 15;7(4):ooae108. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae108. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Use of a continuous single lead electrocardiogram analytic to predict patient deterioration requiring rapid response team activation.使用连续单导联心电图分析来预测需要快速反应小组激活的患者病情恶化。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 24;3(10):e0000465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000465. eCollection 2024 Oct.
在纽约市地区,5700 名因 COVID-19 住院的患者的特征、合并症和结局。
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2052-2059. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775.
4
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal.COVID-19 诊断和预后预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1328.
5
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.新冠疫情期间稀缺医疗资源的公平分配
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
6
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.剖析用于管理人群健康的算法中的种族偏见。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
7
Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?医疗保健中的预测分析:我们如何知道它是否有效?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1651-1654. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz130.
8
A Generalizable, Data-Driven Approach to Predict Daily Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection at Two Large Academic Health Centers.一种可推广的数据驱动方法,用于预测两个大型学术医疗中心的艰难梭菌感染的每日风险。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):425-433. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.16.
9
Comparison of the Between the Flags calling criteria to the MEWS, NEWS and the electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) score for the identification of deteriorating ward patients.对比 Flags 呼叫标准与 MEWS、NEWS 和电子心搏骤停风险分诊 (eCART) 评分在识别病房恶化患者中的作用。
Resuscitation. 2018 Feb;123:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
10
Rothman Index variability predicts clinical deterioration and rapid response activation.罗斯曼指数变异性可预测临床恶化及快速反应激活。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jan;215(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.031. Epub 2017 Aug 10.