Department of Learning Health Sciences.
Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Jul;18(7):1129-1137. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-698OC.
The Epic Deterioration Index (EDI) is a proprietary prediction model implemented in over 100 U.S. hospitals that was widely used to support medical decision-making during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The EDI has not been independently evaluated, and other proprietary models have been shown to be biased against vulnerable populations. To independently evaluate the EDI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 overall and in disproportionately affected subgroups. We studied adult patients admitted with COVID-19 to units other than the intensive care unit at a large academic medical center from March 9 through May 20, 2020. We used the EDI, calculated at 15-minute intervals, to predict a composite outcome of intensive care unit-level care, mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital death. In a subset of patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours, we also evaluated the ability of the EDI to identify patients at low risk of experiencing this composite outcome during their remaining hospitalization. Among 392 COVID-19 hospitalizations meeting inclusion criteria, 103 (26%) met the composite outcome. The median age of the cohort was 64 (interquartile range, 53-75) with 168 (43%) Black patients and 169 (43%) women. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the EDI was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.84). EDI predictions did not differ by race or sex. When exploring clinically relevant thresholds of the EDI, we found patients who met or exceeded an EDI of 68.8 made up 14% of the study cohort and had a 74% probability of experiencing the composite outcome during their hospitalization with a sensitivity of 39% and a median lead time of 24 hours from when this threshold was first exceeded. Among the 286 patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours who had not experienced the composite outcome, 14 (13%) never exceeded an EDI of 37.9, with a negative predictive value of 90% and a sensitivity above this threshold of 91%. We found the EDI identifies small subsets of high-risk and low-risk patients with COVID-19 with good discrimination, although its clinical use as an early warning system is limited by low sensitivity. These findings highlight the importance of independent evaluation of proprietary models before widespread operational use among patients with COVID-19.
《史诗恶化指数(EDI)》是一种专有的预测模型,已在美国 100 多家医院实施,在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间被广泛用于支持医疗决策。该模型尚未经过独立评估,其他专有模型已被证明对弱势群体存在偏见。
本研究旨在独立评估 COVID-19 住院患者的 EDI 总体情况和受影响较大的亚组情况。
我们研究了 2020 年 3 月 9 日至 5 月 20 日期间,在一家大型学术医疗中心除重症监护病房外的其他科室因 COVID-19 住院的成年患者。我们使用 EDI(每 15 分钟计算一次)预测 ICU 级护理、机械通气或院内死亡的综合结局。在至少住院 48 小时的患者亚组中,我们还评估了 EDI 识别在剩余住院期间低风险经历该综合结局的患者的能力。
在符合纳入标准的 392 例 COVID-19 住院患者中,有 103 例(26%)符合复合结局。队列的中位年龄为 64 岁(四分位距 53-75 岁),其中 168 例(43%)为黑人患者,169 例(43%)为女性。EDI 的接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.79(95%置信区间 0.74-0.84)。EDI 预测不受种族或性别影响。在探索 EDI 的临床相关阈值时,我们发现符合或超过 EDI 68.8 的患者占研究队列的 14%,在住院期间发生复合结局的概率为 74%,其敏感性为 39%,中位领先时间为首次超过该阈值后 24 小时。在至少住院 48 小时且未发生复合结局的 286 例患者中,有 14 例(13%)从未超过 EDI 37.9,其阴性预测值为 90%,且该阈值以上的敏感性为 91%。
我们发现 EDI 可以很好地区分 COVID-19 的小部分高危和低危患者,尽管其作为早期预警系统的临床应用受到低敏感性的限制。这些发现强调了在 COVID-19 患者中广泛使用之前,对专有模型进行独立评估的重要性。