Suppr超能文献

编辑精选 - 外周血管手术中局部麻醉与全身麻醉的比较:丹麦一项 17359 例手术的倾向评分匹配全国队列研究。

Editor's Choice - Regional Versus General Anaesthesia in Peripheral Vascular Surgery: a Propensity Score Matched Nationwide Cohort Study of 17 359 Procedures in Denmark.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;61(3):430-438. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.025. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cardiopulmonary comorbidity is common in vascular surgery. General anaesthesia (GA) may impair perfusion and induce respiratory depression. Regional anaesthesia (RA), including neuraxial or peripheral nerve blocks, may therefore be associated with a better outcome.

METHODS

This was a nationwide retrospective cohort study. All open inguinal and infra-inguinal arterial surgical reconstructions from 2005 to 2017 were included. Data were extracted from national registries. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models and propensity score matching were used. The propensity score was derived by developing a model that predicted the probability that a given patient would receive GA based on age, comorbidity, anticoagulant medication, procedure type, and the urgency of surgery. Matching was performed in four groups based on American Society of Anesthesiologists' score I - II, score III - V, and gender. Outcome parameters included surgical and general complications (bleeding, thrombosis/embolus, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, cerebral, and >3 days intensive care therapy), length of stay, and 30 day mortality, hypothesising a better outcome after RA.

RESULTS

There were 10 509 procedures in the GA group and 6 850 in the RA group. After propensity score matching, 6 267 procedures were included in each group. Surgical and general complications were significantly more common after GA in both matched (3.8 vs. 2.5%, p < .001 and 6.5 vs. 4.2%, p < .001) and unmatched analyses (3.8 vs. 2.5%, p < .001 and 6.5 vs. 4.2%, p < .001). The 30 day mortality rate was significantly higher after GA, in matched and un matched analyses (3.1 vs. 2.4%, p = .019 and 4.1 vs. 2.4%, p < .001). There was no difference in length of stay.

CONCLUSION

RA may be associated with a better outcome, compared with GA, after open inguinal and infra-inguinal peripheral vascular surgery. In the clinical context when RA is not feasible, GA can still be considered safe.

摘要

目的

心血管合并症在血管外科中很常见。全身麻醉(GA)可能会损害灌注并引起呼吸抑制。因此,区域麻醉(RA),包括椎管内或外周神经阻滞,可能与更好的结果相关。

方法

这是一项全国性回顾性队列研究。纳入了 2005 年至 2017 年间所有开放性腹股沟和股下动脉重建手术。数据从国家登记处提取。采用多变量线性和逻辑回归模型以及倾向评分匹配。通过建立一个模型来预测给定患者接受 GA 的概率来得出倾向评分,该模型基于年龄、合并症、抗凝药物、手术类型和手术的紧急程度。根据美国麻醉医师协会评分 I- II、III-V 和性别,将患者分为四组进行匹配。观察指标包括手术和一般并发症(出血、血栓/栓塞、心脏、肺部、肾脏、脑部和>3 天重症监护治疗)、住院时间和 30 天死亡率,假设 RA 后结果更好。

结果

GA 组有 10 509 例,RA 组有 6 850 例。在进行倾向评分匹配后,每组纳入 6 267 例。在匹配和未匹配分析中,GA 后手术和一般并发症更为常见(3.8%比 2.5%,p<0.001;6.5%比 4.2%,p<0.001)。30 天死亡率在匹配和未匹配分析中也更高(GA 组为 3.1%比 2.4%,p=0.019;GA 组为 4.1%比 2.4%,p<0.001)。住院时间无差异。

结论

与 GA 相比,RA 可能与开放性腹股沟和股下血管外科手术后更好的结果相关。在 RA 不可行的临床情况下,仍可考虑 GA 安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验