Schlau N, Mertens D R, Taysom K, Taysom D
Dairyland Laboratories Inc., Arcadia, WI 54612.
Mertens Innovation & Research LLC, Belleville, WI 53508.
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Feb;104(2):1846-1854. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18731. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
Filter bags facilitate the measurement of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber (aNDF) and in vitro (IV) undigested aNDF (uNDF) by eliminating the transfer of residues from beakers into filtration crucibles. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine effects of filter bags on recovery of aNDF and (2) evaluate effects of filter bags on IV uNDF. For study 1, 6 samples each of grass hay (GR), alfalfa (AL), and corn silage (CS) were selected. Large standard deviations (SD) of ash-free aNDF (aNDFom) for samples in each forage type indicated compositional diversity (15.1, 7.45, and 12.9% of DM for GR, AL, and CS, respectively), and starch SD for CS was 16.4% of DM. Samples were weighed into Berzelius beakers or filter bags [25-µm pores (F57) or 6-µm pores (F58); Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY] for measurement of aNDF and aNDFom. All samples were extracted with neutral detergent, thermostable α-amylase, and sodium sulfite, and then soaked in boiling water and then acetone. Residues from beakers were filtered through a sea sand-covered GF/D filter (Whatman, Marlborough, MA) in Gooch crucibles (CR). Filter bags were extracted in a pressurized chamber at 100°C. The aNDF values did not differ between F57 and CR, but F58 was greater than CR for CS and AL. For GR, F58 was greater than CR for aNDFom. For study 2, diverse samples with large SD of aNDFom (20.7, 7.45, and 12.9% of DM for GR, AL, and CS, respectively) were weighed as loose powder into medium bottles (LS) or F57 bags, which were weighted to prevent floating. Blended ruminal fluid from 3 steers fed a 30% aNDFom diet was used as inoculum. Three samples of 1 forage type were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 IV runs using both treatments (LS and F57), and 3 bottles of each sample-treatment combination were removed after 12 h and 2 were removed after 120 h to measure uNDF. For LS, residues were extracted as in study 1 for CR. For F57, bags were rinsed in cold water and extracted as described in study 1. After 12 h, uNDF of F57 was greater than LS in CS, AL, and overall types. Ash-free uNDF (uNDFom) after 12 h of F57 was greater than LS in CS and overall types. After 120 h, F57 was greater than LS for uNDF of CS, but no differences were detected for uNDFom. The SD of uNDFom, but not uNDF, was higher after 12 and 120 h for F57 compared with LS. From 6 to 96 h, overall gas production of F57 was less than LS, and F57 was less than LS for CS from 3 to 96 h. Overall, LS gave greater maximum and faster rates of gas production than F57, as did AL and CS, but lag did not vary. Results indicate that filter bags affected aNDF and aNDFom measurement and inhibited fermentation for some materials.
滤袋通过避免残渣从烧杯转移至过滤坩埚,便于测定经淀粉酶处理的中性洗涤纤维(aNDF)和体外(IV)未消化的aNDF(uNDF)。本研究的目的是:(1)确定滤袋对aNDF回收率的影响;(2)评估滤袋对IV uNDF的影响。在研究1中,每种干草(GR)、苜蓿(AL)和玉米青贮(CS)各选取6个样本。每种饲草类型样本的无灰aNDF(aNDFom)的标准偏差(SD)较大,表明成分具有多样性(GR、AL和CS的干物质分别为15.1%、7.45%和12.9%),CS的淀粉SD为干物质的16.4%。将样本称重放入贝泽留斯烧杯或滤袋[25 µm孔径(F57)或6 µm孔径(F58);安科姆技术公司,马其顿,纽约]中,用于测定aNDF和aNDFom。所有样本均用中性洗涤剂、耐热α -淀粉酶和亚硫酸钠提取,然后在沸水中浸泡,再用丙酮浸泡。烧杯中的残渣通过覆盖有海砂的GF/D滤纸(沃特曼公司,马尔伯勒,马萨诸塞州)在古氏坩埚(CR)中过滤。滤袋在100°C的加压室中提取。F57和CR的aNDF值无差异,但CS和AL的F58大于CR。对于GR,F58的aNDFom大于CR。在研究2中,将aNDFom标准偏差较大的不同样本(GR、AL和CS的干物质分别为20.7%、7.45%和12.9%)作为松散粉末称重放入中型瓶(LS)或F57袋中,对袋子进行称重以防止漂浮。使用来自3头饲喂30% aNDFom日粮的阉牛的混合瘤胃液作为接种物。将每种饲草类型的3个样本随机分配到6次IV试验中的1次,同时使用两种处理(LS和F57),在12小时后取出每个样本 - 处理组合的3瓶,在120小时后取出2瓶以测量uNDF。对于LS,残渣按照研究1中CR的方法提取。对于F57,袋子用冷水冲洗后按照研究1中描述的方法提取。12小时后,CS、AL和总体类型中F57的uNDF大于LS。12小时后,CS和总体类型中F57的无灰uNDF(uNDFom)大于LS。120小时后,CS的uNDF中F57大于LS,但uNDFom未检测到差异。与LS相比,F57在12小时和120小时后的uNDFom的SD较高,但uNDF的SD不高。从6小时到96小时,F57的总体产气量小于LS,从3小时到96小时,CS的F57小于LS。总体而言,LS的最大产气量和产气速率比F57高,AL和CS也是如此,但延迟时间没有变化。结果表明,滤袋影响aNDF和aNDFom的测量,并抑制了某些物质的发酵。