McFarlane A C
Department of Psychiatry, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 Jan;176(1):22-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198801000-00003.
This study examined the utility of the DSM-III diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in a high-risk group of 50 firefighters who had had an intense exposure to a natural disaster 8 months before being interviewed. Follow-up over the next 3 years allowed examination of the ability of these diagnostic criteria to predict a pattern of chronic posttraumatic morbidity. They predicted a pattern of chronic disorder, demonstrated by the finding that eight of the 15 subjects who had definite or borderline PTSD at 8 months remained symptomatic 3 years later. A disturbance of attention and concentration appeared to be the best predictor of chronic PTSD. The longitudinal course of posttraumatic morbidity in these 50 firefighters was compared with a matched group of 96 uninterviewed subjects 11 and 29 months after the disaster. Although the interview provoked an emotional catharsis in a number of firefighters, the long-term morbidity in the two groups was comparable. Fourteen subjects who did not have PTSD continued to experience intense imagery 8 months after the disaster. This observation raises questions about whether such thoughts and feelings have adequate specificity as diagnostic criteria for PTSD in a group that has recently been exposed to a traumatic event.
本研究检验了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断标准在一组高危人群中的效用,该组50名消防员在接受访谈前8个月曾遭受一场自然灾害的强烈影响。在接下来的3年里进行随访,以检验这些诊断标准预测慢性创伤后发病模式的能力。他们预测出一种慢性疾病模式,这一模式体现在以下发现中:在8个月时患有明确或边缘性PTSD的15名受试者中,有8名在3年后仍有症状。注意力和专注力的紊乱似乎是慢性PTSD的最佳预测指标。将这50名消防员创伤后发病的纵向病程与一组96名未接受访谈的匹配受试者在灾难发生11个月和29个月后的情况进行了比较。尽管访谈在一些消防员中引发了情绪宣泄,但两组的长期发病率相当。14名未患PTSD的受试者在灾难发生8个月后仍持续经历强烈的意象。这一观察结果引发了一些问题,即在最近遭受创伤事件的群体中,此类想法和感受作为PTSD诊断标准是否具有足够的特异性。