Suppr超能文献

个人防护装备对模拟人体模型院前气管插管性能的影响。

Impact of personal protective equipment on prehospital endotracheal intubation performance in simulated manikin.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Aksaray University Training and Research Hospital, Aksaray, Turkey.

出版信息

Australas Emerg Care. 2021 Sep;24(3):235-239. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tracheal intubation in COVID-19 patients is a potentially high-risk procedure for healthcare professionals. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is recommended to minimize contact with critical patients with COVID-19 infection. This study aimed to primarily examine the effect of PPE use on intubation time and success rate among prehospital healthcare professionals; additionally, we compared intubation times among prehospital health care professionals using PPE with direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy assistance.

METHODS

In this prospective simulation study, we compared the intubation times and success rates among prehospital healthcare professionals who were or were not using PPE. Furthermore, demographic data, previous intubation experience, and previous intubation experience with PPE were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall time to intubation with PPE use was 51.28±3.89s, which was significantly higher than that without PPE use (33.03±2.65s; p<0.001). In addition, the overall success rate with PPE use was 74.4%, which was significantly lower than that without PPE use (93%;p<0.001). PPE use increased the average intubation time by 19.73±2.59s with direct laryngoscopy and by 16.81±2.86s with video laryngoscopy (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PPE use is associated with increased intubation time and decreased success rate. Video laryngoscopy assistance in cases where PPE use is required facilitates faster endotracheal intubation than does direct laryngoscopy assistance.

摘要

背景

对 COVID-19 患者进行气管插管对医护人员来说是一种潜在的高风险操作。建议使用个人防护设备(PPE),以最大程度减少与 COVID-19 感染的重症患者的接触。本研究主要旨在考察 PPE 使用对院前医护人员插管时间和成功率的影响;此外,我们比较了使用 PPE 与直接喉镜和视频喉镜辅助的院前医护人员的插管时间。

方法

在这项前瞻性模拟研究中,我们比较了使用 PPE 和不使用 PPE 的院前医护人员的插管时间和成功率。此外,还记录了人口统计学数据、先前的插管经验以及使用 PPE 的先前插管经验。

结果

使用 PPE 的插管总时间为 51.28±3.89s,明显长于不使用 PPE 的插管总时间(33.03±2.65s;p<0.001)。此外,使用 PPE 的总体成功率为 74.4%,明显低于不使用 PPE 的成功率(93%;p<0.001)。与不使用 PPE 相比,使用 PPE 使直接喉镜下的平均插管时间增加了 19.73±2.59s,视频喉镜下的平均插管时间增加了 16.81±2.86s(p<0.001)。

结论

PPE 的使用与插管时间延长和成功率降低有关。在需要使用 PPE 的情况下,视频喉镜辅助比直接喉镜辅助更有利于快速进行气管插管。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db15/7759446/047b61f38172/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验