Suppr超能文献

维持 COVID-19 个人防护措施下的院前插管成功率。

Maintaining Prehospital Intubation Success with COVID-19 Personal Protective Precautions.

机构信息

Emergency Retrieval and Transfer Service (EMRTS) Wales Air Ambulance, Llanelli Gate, Dafen, Wales, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Dec;37(6):783-787. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22001273. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tracheal intubation is a high-risk intervention for exposure to airborne infective pathogens, including the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). During the recent pandemic, personal protective equipment (PPE) was essential to protect staff during intubation but is recognized to make the practical conduct of anesthesia and intubation more difficult. In the early phase of the coronavirus pandemic, some simple alterations were made to the emergency anesthesia standard operating procedure (SOP) of a prehospital critical care service to attempt to maintain high intubation success rates despite the challenges posed by wearing PPE. This retrospective observational cohort study aims to compare first-pass intubation success rates before and after the introduction of PPE and an altered SOP.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2019 through August 30, 2021. The retrospective analysis used prospectively collected data using prehospital electronic patient records. Anonymized data were held in Excel (v16.54) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (v28). Patient inclusion criteria were those of all ages who received a primary tracheal intubation attempt outside the hospital by critical care teams. March 27, 2020 was the date from which the SOP changed to mandatory COVID-19 SOP including Level 3 PPE - this date is used to separate the cohort groups.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed from 1,266 patients who received primary intubations by the service. The overall first-pass intubation success rate was 89.7% and the overall intubation success rate was 99.9%. There was no statistically significant difference in first-pass success rate between the two groups: 90.3% in the pre-COVID-19 group (n = 546) and 89.3% in the COVID-19 group (n = 720); Pearson chi-square 0.329; P = .566. In addition, there was no statistical difference in overall intubation success rate between groups: 99.8% in the pre-COVID-19 group and 100.0% in the COVID-19 group; Pearson chi-square 1.32; P = .251.Non-drug-assisted intubations were more than twice as likely to require multiple attempts in both the pre-COVID-19 group (n = 546; OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.19-3.90; P = .01) and in the COVID-19 group (n = 720; OR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.1; P = <.001).

CONCLUSION

This study presents simple changes to a prehospital intubation SOP in response to COVID-19 which included mandatory use of PPE, the first intubator always being the most experienced clinician, and routine first use of video laryngoscopy (VL). These changes allowed protection of the clinical team while successfully maintaining the first-pass and overall success rates for prehospital tracheal intubation.

摘要

背景

气管插管是一种具有高风险的干预措施,可能会暴露于空气中的感染性病原体,包括新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)。在最近的大流行期间,个人防护设备(PPE)对于在插管过程中保护工作人员至关重要,但也被认为使麻醉和插管的实际操作更加困难。在冠状病毒大流行的早期阶段,对院前危重病服务的紧急麻醉标准操作程序(SOP)进行了一些简单的修改,试图在穿戴 PPE 带来的挑战下保持高插管成功率。这项回顾性观察队列研究旨在比较引入 PPE 和修改后的 SOP 前后的首次插管成功率。

方法

这项回顾性观察队列研究于 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 30 日进行。回顾性分析使用了院前电子患者记录中前瞻性收集的数据。匿名数据保存在 Excel(v16.54)中,并使用 IBM SPSS Statistics(v28)进行分析。患者纳入标准为所有年龄组的患者,由危重病团队在医院外接受初次气管插管尝试。2020 年 3 月 27 日是 SOP 更改为强制性 COVID-19 SOP 的日期,包括 3 级 PPE-该日期用于分离队列组。

结果

该服务对 1266 名接受初次插管的患者进行了数据分析。首次插管的总体成功率为 89.7%,总体插管成功率为 99.9%。两组间首次插管成功率无统计学差异:COVID-19 组(n=720)为 89.3%,COVID-19 组(n=546)为 90.3%;皮尔逊卡方 0.329;P=.566。此外,两组的总体插管成功率无统计学差异:COVID-19 组为 99.8%,COVID-19 组为 100.0%;皮尔逊卡方 1.32;P=.251。在 COVID-19 组(n=720)中,非药物辅助插管需要多次尝试的可能性是 COVID-19 组(n=546)的两倍多(OR=2.15;95%CI,1.19-3.90;P=0.01)。

结论

本研究提出了针对 COVID-19 的院前插管 SOP 的简单修改,包括强制性使用 PPE、首次插管者始终是最有经验的临床医生以及常规首次使用视频喉镜(VL)。这些变化使临床团队得到了保护,同时成功地保持了院前气管插管的首次插管成功率和总体成功率。

相似文献

1
Maintaining Prehospital Intubation Success with COVID-19 Personal Protective Precautions.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Dec;37(6):783-787. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22001273. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
Comparison of intubation devices in level C personal protective equipment: A cadaveric study.
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;36(6):922-925. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.047. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
5
Impact of personal protective equipment on prehospital endotracheal intubation performance in simulated manikin.
Australas Emerg Care. 2021 Sep;24(3):235-239. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验