Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Italy.
Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Italy.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73:454-462. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.10.052. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
Concern exists about durability of stent grafts used to bridge aortic grafts to visceral and renal arteries during fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/B-EVAR). There are no guidelines regarding the ideal technique for joining target vessels (TVs).
We systematically reviewed data published from 2014 to 2019 using PRISMA guidelines and PICO models. Keywords were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. All articles were screened by two authors (a third author in case of discrepancies). Only original articles regarding F/B-EVAR in complex aortic aneurysm, reporting the number and type of TVs mated, the onset of bridging stent complications, and reinterventions on TVs were included. Analysis included quality assessment scoring, types of stent grafts, and complications related to bridging stents.
19 studies were included with 2,796 patients and 9556 TV; 4,797 renal arteries (50.2%), 4,174 visceral arteries (43.6%), and undefined TV (n = 585; 6.1%) were bridged. Balloon-expandable stent-grafts (B-EXP) were used in 40.9% and self-expandable (S-EXP) in 22.7% and undefined stents in 36.3%. The included studies had quality assessment scores ranging between 11/15 and 15/15, with high grade of accordance on reporting general results, but a low grade of accordance on reporting detailed data. Despite study heterogeneity, high-volume analysis confirmed a higher rate of complication in renal arteries than visceral arteries, 6% (95% CI 4-8) vs. 2% (95% CI 1-3), respectively. The rate of reinterventions was similar, 3% (95% CI 2-4) and 2% (95% CI 1-3). S-EXP versus B-EXP stent complication was 4% (95% CI 2-7) vs. 3% (95% CI 2-5), respectively.
This systematic review underlines the low grade of accordance in reporting detailed data of bridging stents in F/B-EVAR. Renal TVs were more prone to complications, with an equivalent reintervention rate to visceral TVs. As to B-EVAR, the choice of B-EXP over S-EXP is still uncertain.
在开窗和分支腔内血管修复术(F/B-EVAR)中,使用支架移植物桥接内脏和肾动脉的主动脉移植物,人们对支架移植物的耐久性存在担忧。目前尚无关于连接靶血管(TV)的理想技术的指南。
我们使用 PRISMA 指南和 PICO 模型系统地回顾了 2014 年至 2019 年发表的数据。在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 中搜索关键词。两名作者(如有分歧,则由第三名作者)筛选所有文章。仅纳入关于复杂主动脉瘤 F/B-EVAR 的原始文章,报告匹配的 TV 数量和类型、桥接支架并发症的发生以及对 TV 的再干预。分析包括质量评估评分、支架移植物类型和与桥接支架相关的并发症。
纳入了 19 项研究,共 2796 例患者和 9556 个 TV;4797 个肾动脉(50.2%)、4174 个内脏动脉(43.6%)和未定义的 TV(n=585;6.1%)被桥接。球囊扩张支架(B-EXP)的使用率为 40.9%,自扩张(S-EXP)为 22.7%,未定义支架为 36.3%。纳入的研究质量评估评分在 11/15 至 15/15 之间,在报告一般结果方面具有高度一致性,但在报告详细数据方面一致性较低。尽管研究存在异质性,但大容量分析证实肾动脉的并发症发生率高于内脏动脉,分别为 6%(95%CI 4-8)和 2%(95%CI 1-3)。再干预率相似,分别为 3%(95%CI 2-4)和 2%(95%CI 1-3)。S-EXP 与 B-EXP 支架并发症分别为 4%(95%CI 2-7)和 3%(95%CI 2-5)。
本系统评价强调了 F/B-EVAR 中桥接支架详细数据报告一致性较低的问题。肾 TV 更容易发生并发症,再干预率与内脏 TV 相当。对于 B-EVAR,B-EXP 与 S-EXP 的选择仍不确定。