• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型 NeVa M1 支架取栓器机械血栓切除术:“滴区”代表风险还是获益?

Mechanical Thrombectomy with the Novel NeVa M1 Stent Retriever: Do the Drop Zones Represent a Risk or a Benefit?

机构信息

Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; University Institute for Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Minden, Germany.

Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e121-e129. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.075. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.075
PMID:33359523
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The NeVa M1 thrombectomy device is a novel hybrid-cell stent retriever with multifunctional zones for optimized retrieval of resistant clots located in the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery. The objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the NeVa in a "real-life" setting.

METHODS

Twenty-nine consecutive patients (median age: 77 years) treated with the NeVa M1 for acute ischemic stroke of the M1 segement were retrospectively reviewed. First-pass and final modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) scores, device-related complications, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores are reported. Primary outcome parameters were first-pass mTICI 2b-3 reperfusion and mRS 0-2 at 90 days.

RESULTS

Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores decreased from 16 to 12 after treatment. mTICI 2b-3 reperfusion rates were 55% after the first pass, 79% after 1-2 passes, and 100% after the final pass. mTICI 2c-3 was obtained in 48% after the first pass, 62% after 1-2 passes, and 72% after the final pass. Rescue treatment was performed in 4 patients (14%). Device-related complications included 1 asymptomatic caroticocavernous fistula, 1 asymptomatic M2 dissection, and 1 symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. The procedure-related vasospasm rate was 48%. A 90-day mRS of 0-2 was achieved by 31%.

CONCLUSIONS

The NeVa M1 provides a high first-pass complete reperfusion rate with an adequate safety profile. To retrieve resistant clots, the stent design exerts high mechanical traction forces, which may trigger vasospasm and vessel wall damage. Large, comparative studies are warranted to draw a definite conclusion on this device.

摘要

目的

NeVa M1 血栓切除术装置是一种新型杂交细胞支架取栓器,具有多功能区域,可优化对大脑中动脉 M1 段内的耐药性血栓的提取。目的在于评估 NeVa 在“真实生活”环境中的安全性和疗效。

方法

回顾性分析 29 例接受 NeVa M1 治疗的大脑中动脉 M1 段急性缺血性脑卒中患者。报告首次通过和最终改良脑梗死溶栓(mTICI)评分、与器械相关的并发症、症状性颅内出血和 90 天改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分。主要结果参数为首次通过 mTICI 2b-3 再灌注和 90 天 mRS 0-2。

结果

治疗后,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分中位数从 16 分降至 12 分。首次通过的 mTICI 2b-3 再灌注率为 55%,1-2 次通过的再灌注率为 79%,最终通过的再灌注率为 100%。首次通过获得 mTICI 2c-3 的比例为 48%,1-2 次通过的比例为 62%,最终通过的比例为 72%。4 例患者(14%)进行了挽救性治疗。与器械相关的并发症包括 1 例无症状颈动脉海绵窦瘘、1 例无症状 M2 夹层和 1 例症状性颅内出血。与操作相关的血管痉挛发生率为 48%。90 天 mRS 0-2 评分达到 31%。

结论

NeVa M1 提供了高的首次通过完全再灌注率,具有良好的安全性。为了提取耐药性血栓,支架设计产生了高的机械牵引力,这可能引发血管痉挛和血管壁损伤。需要进行大型的、对比研究来对该设备得出明确的结论。

相似文献

1
Mechanical Thrombectomy with the Novel NeVa M1 Stent Retriever: Do the Drop Zones Represent a Risk or a Benefit?新型 NeVa M1 支架取栓器机械血栓切除术:“滴区”代表风险还是获益?
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e121-e129. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.075. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
A comparative analysis of 3MAX aspiration versus 3 mm Trevo Retriever for distal occlusion thrombectomy in acute stroke.3MAX 抽吸与 3mm Trevo Retriever 在急性脑卒中远端闭塞取栓中的对比分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Mar;12(3):279-282. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014990. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Immediate and 90-Day Clinical Outcome of Patients with Acute Stroke Treated with the NeVa-Vesalio Mechanical Thrombectomy Device: A Retrospective Case Series.使用NeVa-Vesalio机械取栓装置治疗的急性卒中患者的即刻和90天临床结局:一项回顾性病例系列研究
World Neurosurg. 2023 Nov;179:e212-e221. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.053. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
Adjustment of Stent Retriever Length to Clot Extent Affects First-Pass Reperfusion in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.支架取栓长度的调整对急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的首次再灌注的影响。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(3):277-284. doi: 10.1159/000508028. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Combined Approach to Stroke Thrombectomy Using a Novel Short Flexible Aspiration Catheter with a Stent Retriever : Preliminary Clinical Experience.新型短鞘软抽吸导管联合支架取栓治疗脑卒中:初步临床经验。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Jun;32(2):393-400. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01065-7. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
6
Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2C/Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 3 Reperfusion Should Be the Aim of Mechanical Thrombectomy: Insights From the ASTER Trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization).改良溶栓治疗脑梗死 2C/脑梗死 3 再灌注应是机械取栓的目标:来自 ASTER 试验(接触抽吸与支架取栓治疗成功再通的比较)的见解。
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1189-1196. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020700. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
7
Mechanical thrombectomy with a novel stent retriever with multifunctional zones: Initial clinical experience with the NeVa™ thrombectomy device.新型多功区支架取栓器机械血栓切除术:NeVa™血栓切除装置的初步临床经验。
J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;47(4):301-305. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
8
The SAVE Technique : Large-Scale Experience for Treatment of Intracranial Large Vessel Occlusions.SAVE 技术:治疗颅内大血管闭塞的大规模经验。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Dec;29(4):669-676. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0702-4. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With M2 Occlusion in the ASTER Randomized Trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization).在 ASTER 随机试验(接触抽吸与支架取栓治疗成功再通的比较)中,急性缺血性脑卒中 M2 闭塞患者的接触抽吸与支架取栓的比较。
Stroke. 2018 Feb;49(2):461-464. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019598. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
10
Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVa stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke.多区域 NeVa 支架取栓器在缺血性脑卒中机械取栓中的有效性和安全性评估。
Neuroradiology. 2023 Dec;65(12):1777-1785. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03236-4. Epub 2023 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The NeVa Net stent-retriever - initial report of 20 cases from two high volume centres.NeVa Net 支架取栓器——来自两个高病例数中心的20例初步报告。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Jul 15;167(1):192. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06586-5.
2
The initial experience with the Walrus balloon guide catheter - Results from two high-volume thrombectomy centres.海象球囊引导导管的初步经验——来自两个高容量血栓切除术中心的结果。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 May 21:15910199251336935. doi: 10.1177/15910199251336935.
3
The NeVa stent-retriever - a single-centre real-world experience.
NeVa 取栓支架——单中心真实世界经验
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 May 21:15910199251337176. doi: 10.1177/15910199251337176.
4
Endovascular recanalization of symptomatic chronic cerebral artery occlusion: predictors for successful recanalization and perioperative complications.有症状的慢性脑动脉闭塞的血管内再通:再通成功及围手术期并发症的预测因素
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 11;16:1453841. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1453841. eCollection 2025.
5
Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the multizone NeVa stent retriever for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke.多区域 NeVa 支架取栓器在缺血性脑卒中机械取栓中的有效性和安全性评估。
Neuroradiology. 2023 Dec;65(12):1777-1785. doi: 10.1007/s00234-023-03236-4. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
Innovation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients over 80 y/o-A Retrospective Monocentric Study on Mechanical Thrombectomy of Consecutive Patients: Is Age an Adequate Selection Criterion?80岁以上急性缺血性卒中患者的创新——一项关于连续患者机械取栓术的回顾性单中心研究:年龄是一个合适的选择标准吗?
J Clin Med. 2023 May 26;12(11):3688. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113688.
7
First pass results of mechanical thrombectomy with two-drop zone NeVa device.两靶点取栓装置(NeVa)机械血栓切除术的初次通栓效果。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug;30(4):458-462. doi: 10.1177/15910199221135309. Epub 2022 Oct 30.