Suppr超能文献

在类似 Stroop 的任务中认知控制的模态特定神经机制。

Modality-specific neural mechanisms of cognitive control in a Stroop-like task.

机构信息

CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 2021 Feb;147:105662. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105662. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

Abstract

The successful resolution of ever-changing conflicting contexts requires efficient cognitive control. Previous studies have found similar neural patterns in conflict processing for different modalities using an event-related potential (ERP) approach and have concluded that cognitive control is supramodal. However, recent behavioral studies have found that conflict adaptation (a phenomenon with the reduction of congruency effect in the current trial after an incongruent trial as compared with a congruent trial) could not transfer across visual and auditory modalities and suggested that cognitive control is modality-specific, challenging the supramodal view. These discrepancies may have also arisen from methodological differences across studies. The current study examined the electroencephalographic profiles of a Stroop-like task to elucidate the modality-specific neural mechanisms of cognitive control. Participants were instructed to respond to a target always coming from the visual modality while disregarding the distractor coming from either the auditory or the visual modality. The results revealed significant congruency effects on both behavioral indices, i.e., reaction time and error rate, and ERP components, including the P3 and the conflict slow potential. Besides, the congruency effects on the amplitude of the P3 showed a negative correlation with reaction time, indicating an intrinsic link between these neural and behavioral indices. Furthermore, in the modality-repetition condition, conflict adaptation effects were significant on both reaction time and P3 amplitude, and the reaction time could be predicted by the P3 amplitude, while such effects were not observed in the modality-alternation condition. The time-frequency analysis also showed that conflict adaptation occurred in the modality-repetition condition, but not in the modality-alternation condition in low frequency bands, including the theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), and beta1 (12-20 Hz) bands. Taken together, our results revealed modality-specific patterns of the conflict adaptation effects on the P3 amplitude and oscillatory power (in theta, alpha, and beta1 bands), providing neural evidence for the modality specificity of cognitive control and expanding the boundaries of cognitive control.

摘要

不断变化的冲突情境的成功解决需要有效的认知控制。先前的研究使用事件相关电位(ERP)方法在不同模态的冲突处理中发现了相似的神经模式,并得出结论认为认知控制是超模态的。然而,最近的行为研究发现,冲突适应(与一致试验相比,在不一致试验后当前试验中的一致性效应减少的现象)不能在视觉和听觉模态之间转移,并表明认知控制是模态特异性的,这挑战了超模态的观点。这些差异也可能源于研究之间的方法差异。本研究通过考察类似于 Stroop 的任务的脑电图特征来阐明认知控制的模态特异性神经机制。参与者被指示始终对来自视觉模态的目标做出反应,同时忽略来自听觉或视觉模态的干扰。结果表明,在行为指标(即反应时间和错误率)和 ERP 成分(包括 P3 和冲突慢波)上均存在显著的一致性效应。此外,P3 振幅上的一致性效应与反应时间呈负相关,表明这些神经和行为指标之间存在内在联系。此外,在模态重复条件下,反应时间和 P3 振幅上的冲突适应效应均显著,并且可以通过 P3 振幅预测反应时间,而在模态交替条件下则未观察到这种效应。时频分析还表明,在模态重复条件下发生了冲突适应,而在模态交替条件下则未发生在低频带(包括θ(4-8 Hz)、α(8-12 Hz)和β1(12-20 Hz)带)。总之,我们的结果揭示了冲突适应对 P3 振幅和振荡功率(在θ、α和β1 波段)的模态特异性模式,为认知控制的模态特异性提供了神经证据,并扩展了认知控制的边界。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验