Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Box 90999, Durham, NC 27708-0999, USA.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Mar;12(1):1-15. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0060-z.
The electrophysiological correlates of conflict processing and cognitive control have been well characterized for the visual modality in paradigms such as the Stroop task. Much less is known about corresponding processes in the auditory modality. Here, electroencephalographic recordings of brain activity were measured during an auditory Stroop task, using three different forms of behavioral response (overt verbal, covert verbal, and manual), that closely paralleled our previous visual Stroop study. As was expected, behavioral responses were slower and less accurate for incongruent than for congruent trials. Neurally, incongruent trials showed an enhanced fronto-central negative polarity wave (N(inc)), similar to the N450 in visual Stroop tasks, with similar variations as a function of behavioral response mode, but peaking ~150 ms earlier, followed by an enhanced positive posterior wave. In addition, sequential behavioral and neural effects were observed that supported the conflict-monitoring and cognitive adjustment hypothesis. Thus, while some aspects of the conflict detection processes, such as timing, may be modality dependent, the general mechanisms would appear to be supramodal.
在 Stroop 任务等范式中,已经很好地描述了视觉模态中冲突处理和认知控制的电生理相关性。在听觉模态中,相应的过程知之甚少。在这里,在听觉 Stroop 任务期间测量了脑活动的脑电图记录,使用了三种不同形式的行为反应(显性言语、隐性言语和手动),这与我们之前的视觉 Stroop 研究非常相似。正如预期的那样,对于不一致的试验,行为反应比一致的试验更慢且更不准确。神经上,不一致的试验显示出增强的额中央负极性波(N(inc)),类似于视觉 Stroop 任务中的 N450,其随行为反应模式的变化而变化,但峰值出现在大约 150ms 之前,随后是增强的正后波。此外,还观察到了支持冲突监测和认知调整假设的顺序行为和神经效应。因此,虽然冲突检测过程的某些方面,例如时间,可能依赖于模态,但一般机制似乎是超模态的。