Department of Child and Adolescent Health Services and Department of Research, Telemark Hospital Trust, P.O. Box 2900 Kjørbekk, Skien 3710, Norway; Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro 701 82, Sweden.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro 701 82, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro 701 82, Sweden.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Mar;115:103840. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103840. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
Systematic use of pain intensity scales is considered a prerequisite for treatment of pain in hospitalized children, but already a decade ago, attention was called to the lack of robust evidence supporting the presumed positive association between their use and desired outcomes.
To re-evaluate the evidence supporting the association between the use of pain scales and patient and process outcomes in hospitalized children.
Systematic literature review.
The online databases PubMed and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched from inception to April 15, 2020.
We performed single screening of all records followed by duplicate screening of full texts of interest with a disagreement procedure in place. Studies where the authors evaluated outcomes from the use of self-report or behavioral-based pain scales in children 0-18 years in a hospital setting were included. Emergency care settings were excluded.
In a majority of the 32 included studies, complex interventions that included one or more pain scales were evaluated. Process outcomes (e.g., documentation) were most frequently studied. Interventions were commonly associated with improved documentation of pain assessment, while the effect on pain management documentation was inconsistent. However, improvements in process outcomes did not necessarily result in better patient outcomes. In regard to patient outcomes (e.g., pain intensity, side effects, or satisfaction with treatment), some authors reported reduced pain intensity on group level, but the effect on other functional outcomes, child and parent satisfaction, and aspects of safety were inconsistent. Methodological issues, e.g., weak study designs and small samples, biased the results, and it was not possible to determine how pain scales contributed to the overall effects since they were studied as part of complex interventions.
Although both a theoretically founded understanding of pain and clinical experience suggest that the use of pain scales will make a difference for hospitalized children with pain, there is still limited evidence to support this notion. As pain scales have been almost exclusively studied as an aspect of complex interventions, research that determines the active ingredient(s) in a complex intervention and their joint and individual effects on outcomes that are meaningful for the child (for example reduced pain intensity or improved function) are urgently needed. Tweetable abstract: Limited #research supports association between use of pediatric #pain scales and patient outcomes @_randida @PainPearl.
系统使用疼痛强度量表被认为是治疗住院儿童疼痛的前提条件,但早在十年前,就有人注意到缺乏强有力的证据支持其使用与预期结果之间的正相关关系。
重新评估支持疼痛量表使用与住院儿童患者和治疗过程结果之间关联的证据。
系统文献回顾。
从建库到 2020 年 4 月 15 日,在线数据库 PubMed 和 Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) 进行了检索。
我们对所有记录进行了单独筛选,然后对感兴趣的全文进行了重复筛选,并制定了不一致的程序。纳入的研究为作者在医院环境中评估 0-18 岁儿童使用自我报告或基于行为的疼痛量表的结果。不包括急诊护理环境。
在 32 项纳入的研究中,大多数研究评估了包含一种或多种疼痛量表的复杂干预措施。过程结果(如记录)是最常研究的内容。干预措施通常与疼痛评估记录的改善相关,而对疼痛管理记录的影响则不一致。然而,过程结果的改善不一定会导致患者结局的改善。在患者结局方面(例如疼痛强度、副作用或对治疗的满意度),一些作者报告了组间疼痛强度的降低,但对其他功能结局、儿童和家长的满意度以及安全性方面的影响则不一致。方法学问题,例如,研究设计薄弱和样本量小,使结果产生偏倚,并且由于疼痛量表是作为复杂干预措施的一部分进行研究的,因此无法确定疼痛量表对总体效果的贡献。
尽管对疼痛的理论理解和临床经验都表明,疼痛量表的使用对患有疼痛的住院儿童会有所帮助,但目前支持这一观点的证据仍然有限。由于疼痛量表几乎完全作为复杂干预措施的一个方面进行研究,因此迫切需要研究确定复杂干预措施中的活性成分及其对儿童有意义的结局(例如减轻疼痛强度或改善功能)的联合和单独效果。可推文摘要:有限的 #研究支持使用儿科 #疼痛量表与患者结局之间的关联 @_randida @PainPearl。