Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Kurashiki, Japan
Forest Health & Biotic Interactions, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
J Virol. 2021 Feb 24;95(6). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01962-20.
The ascomycete causes destructive chestnut blight. Biological control of the fungus by virus infection (hypovirulence) has been shown to be an effective control strategy against chestnut blight in Europe. To provide biocontrol effects, viruses must be able to induce hypovirulence and spread efficiently in chestnut trees. Field studies using living trees to date have focused on a selected family of viruses called hypoviruses, especially prototypic hypovirus CHV1, but there are now known to be many other viruses that infect Here, we tested seven different viruses for their hypovirulence induction, biocontrol potential, and transmission properties between two vegetatively compatible but molecularly distinguishable fungal strains in trees. The test included cytosolically and mitochondrially replicating viruses with positive-sense single-stranded RNA or double-stranded RNA genomes. The seven viruses showed different behaviors and were classified into four groups. Group I, including CHV1, had great biocontrol potential and could protect trees by efficiently spreading and converting virulent to hypovirulent cankers in the trees. Group II could induce high levels of hypovirulence but showed much smaller biocontrol potential, likely because of inefficient virus transmission. Group III showed poor performance in hypovirulence induction and biocontrol, while efficiently being transmitted in the infected trees. Group IV could induce hypovirulence and spread efficiently but showed poor biocontrol potential. Nuclear and mitochondrial genotyping of fungal isolates obtained from the treated cankers confirmed virus transmission between the two fungal strains in most isolates. These results are discussed in view of dynamic interactions in the tripartite pathosystem. The ascomycete causes destructive chestnut blight, which is controllable by hypovirulence-conferring viruses infecting the fungus. The tripartite chestnut//virus pathosystem involves the dynamic interactions of their genetic elements, i.e., virus transmission and lateral transfer of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes between fungal strains via anastomosis occurring in trees. Here, we tested diverse RNA viruses for their hypovirulence induction, biocontrol potential, and transmission properties between two vegetatively compatible but molecularly distinguishable fungal strains in live chestnut trees. The tested viruses, which are different in genome type (single-stranded or double-stranded RNA) and organization, replication site (cytosol or mitochondria), virus form (encapsidated or capsidless) and/or symptomatology, have been unexplored in the aforementioned aspects under controlled conditions. This study showed intriguing different in-tree behaviors of the seven viruses and suggested that to exert significant biocontrol effects, viruses must be able to induce hypovirulence and spread efficiently in the fungus infecting the chestnut trees.
栗疫病菌会引发毁灭性的栗疫病。利用病毒感染(弱毒现象)对真菌进行生物防治已被证明是一种控制栗疫病的有效策略,在欧洲已得到广泛应用。为了发挥生物防治作用,病毒必须能够诱导弱毒现象并在栗树上有效地传播。迄今为止,田间研究主要集中在一类被称为弱毒病毒的病毒上,特别是典型的弱毒病毒 CHV1,但现在已知有许多其他病毒也会感染这里,我们测试了七种不同的病毒在树木中诱导弱毒现象、生物防治潜力和两种营养上兼容但分子上可区分的真菌菌株之间的传播特性。测试包括具有正单链 RNA 或双链 RNA 基因组的胞质和线粒体复制病毒。这七种病毒表现出不同的行为,并被分为四组。第一组包括 CHV1,具有很强的生物防治潜力,可以通过有效传播并将树木中的毒力病毒转化为弱毒病毒来保护树木。第二组可以诱导高水平的弱毒现象,但生物防治潜力较小,可能是因为病毒传播效率低下。第三组在弱毒现象诱导和生物防治方面表现不佳,但在感染的树木中传播效率很高。第四组可以诱导弱毒现象并有效传播,但生物防治潜力较差。从处理后的溃疡中获得的真菌分离物的核和线粒体基因分型证实了两种真菌菌株在大多数分离物中的病毒传播。这些结果在考虑三方栗病体系的动态相互作用时进行了讨论。栗疫病菌会引发毁灭性的栗疫病,弱毒现象赋予的病毒感染真菌可以控制这种疫病。三方栗病/病毒体系涉及它们遗传元素的动态相互作用,即病毒在树木中通过发生的吻合进行传播以及通过吻合发生在真菌菌株之间的核和线粒体基因组的侧向转移。在这里,我们在活体栗树上测试了七种不同的 RNA 病毒在诱导弱毒现象、生物防治潜力和两种营养上兼容但分子上可区分的真菌菌株之间的传播特性。测试的病毒在基因组类型(单链或双链 RNA)和组织、复制位置(胞质或线粒体)、病毒形式(包膜或无包膜)和/或症状方面存在差异,在上述方面,它们在受控条件下尚未得到探索。本研究表明,这七种病毒在树上的行为存在有趣的差异,并表明为了发挥显著的生物防治作用,病毒必须能够在感染栗树的真菌中诱导弱毒现象并有效地传播。