Alexandre de Assis Iramaia Salomão, Luvizutto Gustavo José, Bruno Ana Caroline Magrini, Sande de Souza Luciane Aparecida Pascucci
Physical Education Post Graduation Program, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Department of Applied Physical Therapy, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
J Chiropr Med. 2020 Sep;19(3):181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
The aim of this review was to evaluate the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) in individuals with Parkinson disease.
This was a systematic review. We searched for articles with the keywords "Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation" and "Parkinson's disease." The databases searched were Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer, Web of Science, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), the Cochrane Library, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online), Ovid, and PubMed, in addition to reference lists of relevant articles. All scientific articles published before November 2019 that addressed rehabilitative outcomes of PNF for individuals with Parkinson disease were considered. Two investigators independently screened studies according to the eligibility criteria.
Of the 674 articles found, 6 were selected. The PEDro scores of 2 articles were 3 points, and the others scored 7, 8, and 9 points. The meta-analysis investigated 3 articles with the same outcomes: walking speed, stride length, and cadence. We found a statistical difference between PNF and other therapies for gait speed (M = 0.28, 95% confidence interval = 0.21-0.34, < .001).
Based on the meta-analysis, we found that PNF is similar or superior to other therapies as relates to gait speed. The efficacy of PNF for indications of Parkinson disease, however, requires further investigation, as a sufficient number of qualified, well-designed, randomized controlled studies is lacking.
本综述旨在评估本体感觉神经肌肉促进法(PNF)对帕金森病患者的影响。
这是一项系统综述。我们使用关键词“本体感觉神经肌肉促进法”和“帕金森病”搜索文章。除了相关文章的参考文献列表外,搜索的数据库包括Scopus、ScienceDirect、Springer、Web of Science、LILACS(拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献)、CINAHL(护理学与健康相关文献累积索引)、Cochrane图书馆、PEDro(物理治疗证据数据库)、SciELO(科学电子在线图书馆)、Ovid和PubMed。纳入了2019年11月之前发表的所有探讨PNF对帕金森病患者康复效果的科学文章。两名研究者根据纳入标准独立筛选研究。
在检索到的674篇文章中,筛选出6篇。2篇文章的PEDro评分为3分,其他文章的评分分别为7分、8分和9分。荟萃分析纳入了3篇具有相同结果的文章:步行速度、步长和步频。我们发现PNF与其他疗法在步态速度方面存在统计学差异(M = 0.28,95%置信区间 = 0.21 - 0.34,P <.001)。
基于荟萃分析,我们发现PNF在步态速度方面与其他疗法相似或更优。然而,由于缺乏足够数量的高质量、设计良好的随机对照研究,PNF对帕金森病各项指征的疗效仍需进一步研究。