Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Virology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Front Immunol. 2020 Dec 11;11:608645. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.608645. eCollection 2020.
Interferons (IFNs) constitute the first line of defense against microbial infections particularly against viruses. They provide antiviral properties to cells by inducing the expression of hundreds of genes known as interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). The two most important IFNs that can be produced by virtually all cells in the body during intrinsic innate immune response belong to two distinct families: the type I and type III IFNs. The type I IFN receptor is ubiquitously expressed whereas the type III IFN receptor's expression is limited to epithelial cells and a subset of immune cells. While originally considered to be redundant, type III IFNs have now been shown to play a unique role in protecting mucosal surfaces against pathogen challenges. The mucosal specific functions of type III IFN do not solely rely on the restricted epithelial expression of its receptor but also on the distinct means by which type III IFN mediates its anti-pathogen functions compared to the type I IFN. In this review we first provide a general overview on IFNs and present the similarities and differences in the signal transduction pathways leading to the expression of either type I or type III IFNs. By highlighting the current state-of-knowledge of the two archetypical mucosal surfaces ( the respiratory and intestinal epitheliums), we present the differences in the signaling cascades used by type I and type III IFNs to uniquely induce the expression of ISGs. We then discuss in detail the role of each IFN in controlling pathogen infections in intestinal and respiratory epithelial cells. Finally, we provide our perspective on novel concepts in the field of IFN (stochasticity, response heterogeneity, cellular polarization/differentiation and tissue microenvironment) that we believe have implications in driving the differences between type I and III IFNs and could explain the preferences for type III IFNs at mucosal surfaces.
干扰素(IFNs)构成了针对微生物感染,尤其是病毒感染的第一道防线。它们通过诱导数百种被称为干扰素刺激基因(ISGs)的基因表达,为细胞提供抗病毒特性。在固有先天免疫反应中,几乎所有细胞都能产生两种最重要的 IFN,它们属于两个不同的家族:I 型和 III 型 IFN。I 型 IFN 受体广泛表达,而 III 型 IFN 受体的表达仅限于上皮细胞和一部分免疫细胞。虽然最初被认为是冗余的,但现在已经表明 III 型 IFN 在保护黏膜表面免受病原体挑战方面发挥了独特的作用。III 型 IFN 的黏膜特异性功能不仅依赖于其受体在上皮细胞中的受限表达,还依赖于 III 型 IFN 介导其抗病原体功能的独特方式,与 I 型 IFN 相比。在这篇综述中,我们首先概述了 IFNs,并介绍了导致 I 型或 III 型 IFN 表达的信号转导途径的相似性和差异。通过强调两种典型黏膜表面(呼吸道和肠道上皮)的最新知识状态,我们介绍了 I 型和 III 型 IFN 用于独特诱导 ISGs 表达的信号级联的差异。然后,我们详细讨论了每种 IFN 在控制肠道和呼吸道上皮细胞中病原体感染的作用。最后,我们对 IFN 领域的新观点(随机性、反应异质性、细胞极化/分化和组织微环境)提出了我们的看法,我们认为这些观点对推动 I 型和 III 型 IFN 的差异有影响,并可以解释在黏膜表面偏爱 III 型 IFN 的原因。