Schnyer Rosa N, Hullender Rubin Lee
School of Nursing, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Med Acupunct. 2020 Dec 1;32(6):388-390. doi: 10.1089/acu.2020.1479. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
The translation of clinical practice into research presents unique challenges. This is especially the case in evaluating the effect of interventions in the management of chronic conditions such as pain, mental health, substance misuse, and oncology care. Chronic complex conditions might respond to different strategies at different points in time and may require an interdisciplinary approach to treatment. To define the key barriers to the design, implementation, and evaluation of clinical trials of acupuncture that derive from a unidirectional translational research strategy. Critical challenges to the design, implementation, and evaluation of clinical trials of acupuncture center around four areas: (1) insufficient early phase research, (2) suboptimal treatment protocols, (3) inadequate research questions, and 4) a narrowed assessment of outcomes. By promoting research priorities that reflect the complex nature of chronic illness, we can more clearly articulate research questions that better reflect clinical practice, while evaluating the impact of acupuncture in patient care. Key priorities include phase I research funding opportunities, pragmatic trials that evaluate acupuncture embedded in interprofessional teams, and the inclusion of hypothesis-driven secondary outcomes.
将临床实践转化为研究面临着独特的挑战。在评估疼痛、心理健康、药物滥用和肿瘤护理等慢性病管理干预措施的效果时尤其如此。慢性复杂疾病可能在不同时间点对不同策略产生反应,可能需要跨学科的治疗方法。以确定源自单向转化研究策略的针灸临床试验设计、实施和评估的关键障碍。针灸临床试验设计、实施和评估面临的关键挑战集中在四个方面:(1)早期研究不足,(2)治疗方案欠佳,(3)研究问题不充分,以及(4)结果评估范围狭窄。通过推动反映慢性病复杂性质的研究重点,我们可以更清晰地阐明更能反映临床实践的研究问题,同时评估针灸在患者护理中的影响。关键重点包括I期研究资金机会、评估跨专业团队中针灸应用的务实试验,以及纳入假设驱动的次要结果。