Gray Helen, Davies Rachel, Bright Ashleigh, Rayner Ann, Asher Lucy
Asher Behaviour Lab, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
FAI Farms Ltd., The Barn, Wytham, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Dec 10;7:616836. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.616836. eCollection 2020.
Piling is a behavior in laying hens whereby individuals aggregate in larger densities than would be normally expected. When piling behavior leads to mortalities it is known as smothering and its frequent but unpredictable occurrence is a major concern for many egg producers. There are generally considered to be three types of piling: panic, nest box and recurring piling. Whilst nest box and panic piling have apparent triggers, recurring piling does not, making it an enigmatic and ethologically intriguing behavior. The repetitive nature of recurring piling may result in a higher incidence of smothering and could have unconsidered, sub-lethal consequences. Here, we consider the possible causes of recurring piling from an ethological perspective and outline the potential welfare and production consequences. Drawing on a wide range of literature, we consider different timescales of causes from immediate triggers to ontogeny and domestication processes, and finally consider the evolution of collective behavior. By considering different timescales of influence, we built four hypotheses relevant to the causes of piling, which state that the behavior: (i) is caused by hens moving toward or away from an attractant/repellent; (ii) is socially influenced; (iii) is influenced by early life experiences and; (iv) can be described as a maladaptive collective behavior. We further propose that the following could be welfare consequences of piling behavior: Heat stress, physical injury (such as keel bone damage), and behavioral and physiological stress effects. Production consequences include direct and indirect mortality (smothering and knock-on effects of piling, respectively), potential negative impacts on egg quality and on worker welfare. In future studies the causes of piling and smothering should be considered according to the different timescales on which causes might occur. Here, both epidemiological and modeling approaches could support further study of piling behavior, where empirical studies can be challenging.
扎堆是蛋鸡的一种行为,即个体聚集的密度高于正常预期。当扎堆行为导致死亡时,就被称为窒息,其频繁但不可预测的发生是许多蛋鸡养殖户的主要担忧。一般认为有三种类型的扎堆:恐慌性扎堆、产蛋箱扎堆和反复性扎堆。虽然产蛋箱扎堆和恐慌性扎堆有明显的触发因素,但反复性扎堆没有,这使其成为一种神秘且在行为学上引人关注的行为。反复性扎堆的重复性可能导致更高的窒息发生率,并可能产生未被考虑到的亚致死后果。在这里,我们从行为学角度考虑反复性扎堆的可能原因,并概述潜在的福利和生产后果。借鉴广泛的文献,我们考虑了从直接触发因素到个体发育和驯化过程等不同时间尺度的原因,最后考虑了集体行为的进化。通过考虑不同时间尺度的影响,我们提出了四个与扎堆原因相关的假设,即这种行为:(i)是由母鸡朝向或远离吸引物/驱避物移动引起的;(ii)受到社会影响;(iii)受到早期生活经历的影响;(iv)可被描述为一种适应不良的集体行为。我们进一步提出,扎堆行为可能产生以下福利后果:热应激、身体损伤(如龙骨骨折)以及行为和生理应激效应。生产后果包括直接和间接死亡(分别为窒息和扎堆的连锁反应),对蛋品质和工人福利的潜在负面影响。在未来的研究中,应根据扎堆和窒息原因可能出现的不同时间尺度来考虑其成因。在这里,流行病学和建模方法都可以支持对扎堆行为的进一步研究,而实证研究可能具有挑战性。