Suppr超能文献

在癌症护理中,在新冠疫情背景下,替代运动传统如何发挥作用?系统评价综述

How Can Alternative Exercise Traditions Help Against the Background of the COVID-19 in Cancer Care? An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

作者信息

Zhang Yang, Yao Fang, Kuang Xiaohong, Li Lijuan, Huang Lihua, Zhou Qi, Peng Jiazhu, Chang Qingyu

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Zhangjiagang TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou 215600, People's Republic of China.

Department of Surgery, Zhangjiagang TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou 215600, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Dec 17;12:12927-12944. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S282491. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MAs) on alternative exercise traditions in cancer care.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, EBSCOhost, WanFang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP Database were searched from their inception to June 30, 2020. The search used a combination of subject words and free words. The search terms included "Tai Chi," "Qigong," "Baduanjin," "Yoga," "Pilates," "Cancer," "Meta-analysis," and "Systematic review." Two researchers independently performed literature screening and data extraction and used AMSTAR scale and PRISMA statement to evaluate the methodology and the quality of the evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 26 SR/MAs were included. The AMSTAR scale score was 5-10 points, with an average of 7.46±1.33 points. Overall, the methodological quality was considered to be moderate. The PRISMA list score was 13-24 points, with an average of 19.19±2.86 points. Among the papers evaluated, eight reports were relatively complete. A total of 15 papers indicated certain defects. A total of three papers showed relatively serious information defects.

CONCLUSION

Relative to the control group, alternative exercise traditions may be effective in improving the quality of life, anxiety, depression, distress, and fatigue of cancer patients. However, they may not necessarily improve patients' sleep outcome, body mass index, and pain. During convalescence, cancer patients can be encouraged to start engaging in physical exercise, and professionals can develop appropriate exercise alternatives to ensure the expected effect of exercise while ensuring the safety of patients. The methodological quality of the systematic evaluations of the intervention effects of alternative exercise traditions on cancer patients is not satisfactory. Hence, focus should be directed to the improvement of the preliminary design scheme, publication status, literature retrieval, conflict of interest, and other aspects.

摘要

目的

评估关于癌症护理中替代运动传统的系统评价/荟萃分析(SR/MAs)的质量。

方法

检索了PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、Ovid、EBSCOhost、万方数据库、中国知网和维普数据库,检索时间从各数据库建库至2020年6月30日。检索采用主题词和自由词相结合的方式。检索词包括“太极拳”“气功”“八段锦”“瑜伽”“普拉提”“癌症”“荟萃分析”和“系统评价”。两名研究人员独立进行文献筛选和数据提取,并使用AMSTAR量表和PRISMA声明来评估方法学和证据质量。

结果

共纳入26篇SR/MAs。AMSTAR量表得分5 - 10分,平均为7.46±1.33分。总体而言,方法学质量被认为中等。PRISMA清单得分13 - 24分,平均为19.19±2.86分。在评估的论文中,8篇报告相对完整。共有15篇论文存在一定缺陷。共有3篇论文存在较严重的信息缺陷。

结论

相对于对照组,替代运动传统可能有效改善癌症患者的生活质量、焦虑、抑郁、痛苦和疲劳。然而,它们不一定能改善患者的睡眠结果、体重指数和疼痛。在康复期间,可以鼓励癌症患者开始进行体育锻炼,专业人员可以制定合适的替代运动,以确保运动的预期效果,同时确保患者的安全。替代运动传统对癌症患者干预效果的系统评价的方法学质量并不令人满意。因此,应关注初步设计方案、发表状况、文献检索、利益冲突等方面的改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/936c/7753005/a73e71152ab7/CMAR-12-12927-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验