Suppr超能文献

针刺疗法、生物反馈、按摩、气功、松弛疗法、器械引导呼吸法、瑜伽和太极等方法是否可用于降低血压?基于高质量系统评价的推荐意见。

Should acupuncture, biofeedback, massage, Qi gong, relaxation therapy, device-guided breathing, yoga and tai chi be used to reduce blood pressure?: Recommendations based on high-quality systematic reviews.

机构信息

VIP Ward of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.

VIP Ward of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Complement Ther Med. 2019 Feb;42:322-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This review aims to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations in high-quality systematic reviews of non-drug therapies. Hypertensive patients who are resistant or non-adherent to antihypertensive drugs may be easier to manage if they choose alternative non-drug therapies for hypertension, based on this review.

METHODS

P: Adults (>18 years), except pregnant women, with essential hypertension. I: Cupping, moxibustion, acupuncture, acupoint stimulation, yoga, meditation, tai chi, Qi gong, Chinese massage, massage, spinal manipulation, biofeedback, device-guided breathing therapy, aromatherapy, music therapy, and relaxation approaches. C: 1. No treatment. 2. Sham therapy. 3. Conventional treatment, including antihypertensive drugs and lifestyle modification (e.g., exercise). O: 1. Change in the incidence of cardiovascular death. 2. Change in the incidence of myocardial infarction. 3. Change in the incidence of stroke. 4. Change in blood pressure (BP). 5. Efficacy rate of BP lowering. 6. Adverse effects (review specific). S: Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials, including meta-analyses and assessments of the methodological quality/risk of bias.

INFORMATION SOURCES

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database were searched. The bibliographies of the included articles were also searched for relevant systematic reviews. GRADE criteria were used to rate the quality of evidence in systematic reviews considering 6 factors, including risk of bias.

RESULTS

This review ultimately included 13 systematic reviews of 14 non-drug therapies (acupuncture, wet cupping, Baduanjin, blood letting, auricular acupuncture, music, massage, Qi gong, moxibustion, relaxation therapies, biofeedback, device-guided breathing, yoga and tai chi) based on the inclusion criteria. The quality of evidence was generally low, and weak recommendations were given for most therapies except massage and acupuncture plus antihypertensive drug. Based on the analyzed evidence, massage and acupuncture plus antihypertensive drug could benefit people who want to lower their BP and do not have contraindications for massage and acupuncture plus antihypertensive drug.

DISCUSSION/STRENGTH: The GRADE approach makes this review a unique reference for people who are considering the grade of quality of evidence in systematic reviews, the balance of desirable and undesirable consequences and the strength of recommendations to decide which intervention should be used to reduce BP.

LIMITATIONS

Many non-drug therapies were excluded due to the low methodological quality of their systematic reviews, and only 14 therapies were evaluated in this review. As no patient-important outcomes were reviewed, surrogate outcomes were used to rate the strength of recommendations. This approach may cause a decrease in evidence quality according to GRADE, but we argue that this is appropriate in the context of this review.

摘要

背景

本综述旨在评估高质量系统评价中非药物疗法的证据质量和推荐强度。如果高血压患者对降压药物有耐药性或不依从,那么选择替代的非药物疗法可能更容易管理,本综述基于此。

方法

P:年龄大于 18 岁的成年人(不包括孕妇),患有原发性高血压。I:拔罐、艾灸、针灸、穴位刺激、瑜伽、冥想、太极、气功、中式按摩、按摩、脊椎推拿、生物反馈、设备引导呼吸治疗、芳香疗法、音乐疗法和放松方法。C:1. 无治疗。2. 假治疗。3. 常规治疗,包括降压药物和生活方式改变(如运动)。O:1. 心血管死亡发生率的变化。2. 心肌梗死发生率的变化。3. 中风发生率的变化。4. 血压(BP)的变化。5. 降压效果的有效率。6. 不良反应(综述特定)。S:系统评价的随机对照试验,包括荟萃分析和方法学质量/偏倚风险评估。

信息来源

Cochrane 系统评价数据库、效应摘要数据库、 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施和中国科学期刊数据库均进行了检索。还对纳入文章的参考文献进行了检索,以查找相关的系统评价。考虑到 6 个因素(包括偏倚风险),使用 GRADE 标准对系统评价的证据质量进行评级。

结果

本综述最终纳入了 13 项非药物疗法(针灸、湿拔罐、八段锦、放血、耳针、音乐、按摩、气功、艾灸、放松疗法、生物反馈、设备引导呼吸、瑜伽和太极)的 14 项系统评价,符合纳入标准。证据质量普遍较低,除按摩和针灸加降压药外,对大多数疗法的推荐意见较弱。基于分析证据,按摩和针灸加降压药可能有益于那些想降低血压且无按摩和针灸加降压药禁忌的人。

讨论/局限性:由于系统评价的方法学质量低,许多非药物疗法被排除在外,本综述仅评估了 14 种疗法。由于没有审查患者重要结局,因此使用替代结局来评估推荐强度。根据 GRADE,这种方法可能会降低证据质量,但我们认为,在本综述的背景下,这种方法是合适的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验