Fatima Tehreem, Mumtaz Hassan, Khan Muhammad Hassaan, Rasool Saad, Tayyeb Muhammad, Haider Mobeen Z, Hussain Syed T, Shahzad Aamir, Ali Sundas, Hussain Tanveer
Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (CIBNP), Fairfield, USA.
Urology, Guys & St. Thomas Hospital, London, GBR.
Cureus. 2020 Nov 19;12(11):e11565. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11565.
The impact of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial and a part of the scientific community believes it as a biased interpretation of data. Many studies have reported an aggressive pattern of HCC after DAA use. In this study, we attempted to assess the changes in the pattern of HCC after treatment with DAAs or PI (PEG, pegylated-interferon).
A total of 37 HCC patients after DAA treatment and 21 HCC patients after PI treatment were included. The diagnosis of HCC was made and information about demographics, HCC infiltrative pattern, portal vein thrombosis (PVT), time at initial presentation, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage were compared in the two groups.
The total number of male patients in the DAA group was 62% while either gender was almost equal in PI. The age group of 40-60 was more prevalent in the DAA group while the PI group comprised more patients who were above 60 years. Patients in the DAA group presented after 3.35 years on average while patients in the PI group presented after about seven years. Most of the patients presented with the CTP stage of A. That is true for both groups. For BCLC staging, most of the patients had stage C, which means multiple lesions. At the initial presentation, most of the patients presented with multifocal lesions.
Our study found no significant difference in the initial presentation between both groups. However, HCC patients with prior DAA therapy presented early than those with PI therapy.
直接抗病毒药物(DAA)对肝细胞癌(HCC)发展的影响存在争议,部分科学界人士认为这是对数据的片面解读。许多研究报告了使用DAA后HCC的侵袭性模式。在本研究中,我们试图评估使用DAA或聚乙二醇干扰素(PI,聚乙二醇化干扰素)治疗后HCC模式的变化。
共纳入37例接受DAA治疗的HCC患者和21例接受PI治疗的HCC患者。对两组患者进行HCC诊断,并比较人口统计学信息、HCC浸润模式、门静脉血栓形成(PVT)、初次就诊时间、Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)评分和巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期。
DAA组男性患者总数占62%,而PI组男女比例几乎相等。40-60岁年龄组在DAA组中更为普遍,而PI组中60岁以上的患者更多。DAA组患者平均在3.35年后就诊,而PI组患者约在7年后就诊。大多数患者的CTP分期为A期。两组情况均如此。对于BCLC分期,大多数患者为C期,即存在多个病灶。在初次就诊时,大多数患者表现为多灶性病变。
我们的研究发现两组在初次就诊时无显著差异。然而,先前接受DAA治疗的HCC患者比接受PI治疗的患者就诊更早。