Suppr超能文献

非优势手握力和肌肉厚度方面俄罗斯与澳大利亚训练方法的比较:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机对照研究。

Comparison between Russian and Aussie currents in the grip strength and thickness muscles of the non-dominant hand: A double-blind, prospective, randomized-controlled study.

作者信息

Cittadin Gabriela Letícia, Ansolin Gabrielle Zardo, Furtado Santana Nathan Patryck, Tonini Taliny Luiza, Buzanello Azevedo Márcia Rosângela, de Albuquerque Carlos Eduardo, Flor Bertolini Gladson Ricardo

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Cascavel, Brazil.

出版信息

Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Nov 9;66(4):423-428. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.4718. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the Russian and Aussie currents in the force gain and hypertrophy of the forearm muscles responsible for the grip.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This double-blind, prospective, randomized-controlled study included a total of 30 healthy women (mean age: 20.2±1.7 years; range, 18 to 25 years) between May 2018 and July 2018. The participants were randomly divided into three groups: control group (CG, n=10), Aussie current group (ACG, n=10), and Russian current group (RCG, n=10). All three groups underwent a force test with a gripping dynamometer and the collection of images of the superficial and deep flexor muscles of the fingers with diagnostic ultrasound. The CG received a fictious current stimulus, while the other two groups received the designated stimuli from their currents. Further evaluations were performed after 24 h of the 12th application of the current.

RESULTS

For grip, there were no significant differences in the moment of evaluation and interaction, while the effect size yielded certain points to advantages of force gain for the group using the RCG. The thickness of the superficial muscles showed a significant difference for the first evaluation between CG and RCG (p=0.014) and between RCG and ACG (p=0.010), indicating a larger effect size for RCG.

CONCLUSION

Our study results show that the Russian current is proven to be the mode which yields the most optimal results.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较俄罗斯电流和澳大利亚电流对负责握力的前臂肌肉力量增加和肥大的影响。

患者和方法

这项双盲、前瞻性、随机对照研究共纳入了2018年5月至2018年7月期间的30名健康女性(平均年龄:20.2±1.7岁;范围18至25岁)。参与者被随机分为三组:对照组(CG,n = 10)、澳大利亚电流组(ACG,n = 10)和俄罗斯电流组(RCG,n = 10)。所有三组均使用握力计进行力量测试,并通过诊断超声采集手指浅屈肌和深屈肌的图像。CG组接受虚拟电流刺激,而其他两组接受各自电流的指定刺激。在第12次施加电流24小时后进行进一步评估。

结果

对于握力,在评估时刻和交互作用方面没有显著差异,而效应量显示使用RCG组在力量增加方面具有一定优势。在首次评估时,CG组和RCG组之间(p = 0.014)以及RCG组和ACG组之间(p = 0.010)的浅肌厚度存在显著差异,表明RCG组的效应量更大。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,俄罗斯电流被证明是产生最优化结果的模式。

相似文献

7
Immediate and delayed effects of forearm kinesio taping on grip strength.前臂肌内效贴布对握力的即时和延迟效应。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Aug;16(8):e19797. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.19797. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

5
Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on contralateral quadriceps function.神经肌肉电刺激对健侧股四头肌功能的影响。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Feb;38:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验