Suppr超能文献

警示信号、地理位置、考试成绩以及项目主任在确定哪些申请人获得麻醉学住院医师面试机会时所使用的其他因素。

Red Flags, Geography, Exam Scores, and Other Factors Used by Program Directors in Determining Which Applicants Are Offered an Interview for Anesthesiology Residency.

作者信息

Vinagre Rafael, Tanaka Pedro, Park Yoon Soo, Macario Alex

机构信息

Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.

Medical Education, University of Illinois, Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Nov 18;12(11):e11550. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11550.

Abstract

Objective The goal of this study was to measure the most important factors in candidate applications that anesthesiology program directors (PDs) use to decide who to invite for an interview, and how that might change once the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 is only reported as pass/fail. Design Based on a literature review, a comprehensive list of 27 factors used by PDs to select candidates for the interview was developed. An anonymous survey link was emailed to PDs of all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited Anesthesiology residencies. The survey asked PDs to rank order the top 10 factors they currently consider for making interview invitation, and then to repeat the rank ordering as if the USMLE Step 1 score was instead reported as pass/fail as will be done beginning in 2022. Results Forty-five of 159 (28%) PDs responded, with 82% disagreeing with changing the Step 1 score to pass/fail. 84% consider the Step 1 score (77% for Step 2) moderately or very important for selecting an applicant for an interview. The most frequently mentioned "red flags" were failure of a licensing exam, failure of a medical school course, gaps in education without explanation, and criminal history. 69% of PDs agreed that applicants coming from the medical school affiliated with their program would have an advantage over other applicants. Although, the three factors most commonly ranked in the top 10 in importance were the Step 1 score, followed by letters of recommendation, and then the Medical School Performance Evaluation, variability exists in how PDs ranked factors. For example, of the PDs that had Step 1 in the top 10, 27% had it ranked between the 6th and 10th most important. 9% of PDs did not have Step 1 score in the top 10. Core clinical clerkship grades were one of the top 5 factors by 49% of PDs, yet overall was the 6th most common top 10 factor as 36% of PDs did not have core clerkship grades at all in the top 10. Once Step 1 is reported only as pass/fail, PDs had letters of recommendation, Step 2, and the Medical School Performance Evaluation as the most frequently ranked factors in the top 10. 64% of the PDs supported restricting the number of programs a candidate can apply to, with the majority suggesting a limit of 15 to 20 programs per applicant. Conclusion Variability exists among anesthesiology PDs in the key criteria for offering an applicant an interview. Once Step 1 is reported as pass/fail, there will be an increased emphasis on Step 2 scores.

摘要

目的 本研究的目的是衡量麻醉学项目主任(PDs)在决定邀请谁参加面试时,候选人申请中最重要的因素,以及一旦美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步仅报告为通过/失败,情况可能会如何变化。设计 基于文献综述,制定了一份由PDs用于选择面试候选人的27个因素的综合清单。向所有研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)认可的麻醉学住院医师培训项目的PDs发送了匿名调查链接。该调查要求PDs对他们目前在发出面试邀请时考虑的前10个因素进行排序,然后假设USMLE第一步成绩改为通过/失败(从2022年开始将如此报告),再次进行排序。结果 159名PDs中有45名(28%)回复,82%不同意将第一步成绩改为通过/失败。84%认为第一步成绩(第二步为77%)在选择面试申请人时具有中等或非常重要的地位。最常被提及的“警示信号”是执照考试不及格、医学院课程不及格、教育经历有未解释的间断以及犯罪史。69%的PDs同意来自其项目所在医学院的申请人比其他申请人更具优势。尽管,在重要性方面最常排在前10位的三个因素依次是第一步成绩、推荐信,然后是医学院表现评估,但PDs对各因素的排名存在差异。例如,在将第一步成绩排在前10位的PDs中,27%将其排在第6至第10重要的位置。9%的PDs没有将第一步成绩排在前10位。核心临床实习成绩是49%的PDs认为的前5个因素之一,但总体上是第6个最常出现在前10位的因素,因为36%的PDs根本没有将核心实习成绩列入前10位。一旦第一步仅报告为通过/失败,PDs将推荐信、第二步成绩和医学院表现评估列为前10位中最常被排名的因素。64%的PDs支持限制候选人可申请的项目数量,大多数人建议每位申请人限制在15至20个项目。结论 麻醉学PDs在决定给予申请人面试机会的关键标准方面存在差异。一旦第一步报告为通过/失败,将更加重视第二步成绩。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Reducing Over-Interviewing in the Anesthesiology Residency Match.减少麻醉学住院医师匹配中的过度面试
Cureus. 2021 Aug 29;13(8):e17538. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17538. eCollection 2021 Aug.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验