Chair of Cardiology, University of Pisa, and Cardiovascular Division, Pisa University Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Fondazione Villa Serena per la Ricerca, Città Sant'Angelo, Italy.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 May 5;8(3):227-235. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa140.
Whether diabetes without insulin therapy is an independent cardiovascular (CV) risk factor in atrial fibrillation (AF) has recently been questioned. We investigated the prognostic relevance of diabetes with or without insulin treatment in patients in the ARISTOTLE trial.
Patients with AF and increased stroke risk randomized to apixaban vs. warfarin were classified according to diabetes status: no diabetes; diabetes on no diabetes medications; diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs only; or insulin-treated. The associations between such patient subgroups and stroke/systemic embolism (SE), myocardial infarction (MI), and CV death were examined by Cox proportional hazard regression, both unadjusted and adjusted for other prognostic variables. Patients with diabetes were younger and had a higher body mass index. Median CHA2DS2VASc score was 4.0 in patients with diabetes and 3.0 in patients without diabetes. We found no significant difference in stroke/SE incidence across patient subgroups. Compared with no diabetes, only insulin-treated diabetes was significantly associated with higher risk. When adjusted for clinical variables, compared with no diabetes, the hazard ratios (HRs) for MI (95% confidence intervals) were for diabetes on no medication: 1.15 (0.62-2.14); for diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs: 1.32 (0.90-1.94); for insulin-treated diabetes: 2.34 (1.43-3.82); interaction P = 0.008. HRs for CV death were for diabetes on no medication: 1.19 (0.86-166); for diabetes on non-insulin antidiabetic drugs: 1.12 (0.88-1.42); for insulin-treated diabetes 1.85 (1.36-2.53), interaction P = 0.001.
In anticoagulated patients with AF, a higher risk of MI and CV death is largely confined to diabetes treated with insulin.
最近有人质疑,未经胰岛素治疗的糖尿病是否是心房颤动(AF)的独立心血管(CV)危险因素。我们研究了 ARISTOTLE 试验中接受阿哌沙班或华法林治疗的 AF 患者中合并或不合并胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者的预后相关性。
将 AF 且卒中风险增加的患者随机分为接受阿哌沙班或华法林治疗,根据糖尿病状态进行分类:无糖尿病;服用非糖尿病药物的糖尿病;仅服用非胰岛素类降糖药物的糖尿病;或胰岛素治疗的糖尿病。使用 Cox 比例风险回归分析,在未经调整和调整其他预后变量后,分别评估这些患者亚组与卒中/全身性栓塞(SE)、心肌梗死(MI)和 CV 死亡之间的关系。糖尿病患者年龄较小,体重指数较高。糖尿病患者的 CHA2DS2VASc 中位数为 4.0,无糖尿病患者的 CHA2DS2VASc 中位数为 3.0。我们发现各患者亚组的卒中/SE 发生率没有显著差异。与无糖尿病相比,仅胰岛素治疗的糖尿病与更高的风险显著相关。在校正临床变量后,与无糖尿病相比,MI(95%置信区间)的危险比(HR)分别为:无药物治疗的糖尿病:1.15(0.62-2.14);服用非胰岛素类降糖药物的糖尿病:1.32(0.90-1.94);胰岛素治疗的糖尿病:2.34(1.43-3.82);交互 P 值=0.008。CV 死亡的 HR 分别为:无药物治疗的糖尿病:1.19(0.86-166);服用非胰岛素类降糖药物的糖尿病:1.12(0.88-1.42);胰岛素治疗的糖尿病 1.85(1.36-2.53);交互 P 值=0.001。
在接受抗凝治疗的 AF 患者中,MI 和 CV 死亡风险的增加主要局限于接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病。