Department of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Mar 3;50(1):337-345. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa252.
The epidemiologic study of pregnancy and birth outcomes may be hindered by several unique and challenging issues. Pregnancy is a time-limited period in which severe cohort attrition takes place between conception and birth and adverse outcomes are complex and multi-factorial. Biases span those familiar to epidemiologists: selection, confounding and information biases. Specific challenges include conditioning on potential intermediates, how to treat race/ethnicity, and influential windows of prolonged, seasonal and potentially time-varying exposures. Researchers studying perinatal outcomes should be cognizant of the potential pitfalls due to these factors and address their implications with respect to formulating questions of interest, choice of an appropriate analysis approach and interpretations of findings given assumptions. In this article, we catalogue some of the more important potential sources of bias in perinatal epidemiology that have more recently gained attention in the literature, provide the epidemiologic context behind each issue and propose practices for dealing with each issue to the extent possible.
妊娠和分娩结局的流行病学研究可能会受到一些独特且具有挑战性的问题的阻碍。妊娠是一个时间有限的时期,在受孕和分娩之间会发生严重的队列损耗,不良结局复杂且多因素。偏差包括那些熟悉的流行病学学家:选择、混杂和信息偏差。具体的挑战包括对潜在中间因素的条件作用、如何处理种族/民族问题,以及长时间、季节性和潜在时变暴露的影响窗口。研究围产期结局的研究人员应该意识到由于这些因素可能导致的潜在陷阱,并针对感兴趣的问题的制定、适当分析方法的选择以及基于假设对研究结果的解释,来处理这些因素的影响。在本文中,我们列举了一些在围产流行病学中最近受到文献更多关注的更重要的潜在偏倚来源,为每个问题提供了流行病学背景,并提出了处理每个问题的实践方法,在可能的范围内。