National Research University Higher School of Economics, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.
Centre for Health Economics, Management, and Policy, National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;22(2):281-309. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01252-2. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
This paper contributes to the discussion around ex-post (increased utilisation of health care) and ex-ante (changes in health behaviours) moral hazard in supplemental private health insurance. Applying a range of methodologies to data from the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey-Higher School of Economics we exploit a selection mechanism in the data to compare the impact of workplace provided and individually purchased supplemental health insurance on the utilisation of health care, on a range of health behaviours and on self-assessed health. We find compelling policy-relevant evidence of ex-post moral hazard that confirms a theoretical prediction and empirical regularity found in other settings. In contrast to other empirical findings though, our data reveals evidence of ex-ante moral hazard demonstrated by clear behavioural differences between those with self-funded supplemental health insurance and those for whom the workplace finances the additional insurance. We find no evidence that either form of insurance is related to improved self-assessed health.
本文为讨论补充私人医疗保险中的事后(增加医疗保健利用)和事前(健康行为变化)道德风险做出了贡献。我们利用俄罗斯高等经济学院纵向监测调查的数据中的选择机制,应用一系列方法,比较了工作场所提供的和个人购买的补充健康保险对医疗保健的利用、一系列健康行为和自我评估健康的影响。我们发现了有说服力的、与政策相关的事后道德风险证据,证实了在其他环境中发现的理论预测和经验规律。然而,与其他实证研究结果不同的是,我们的数据显示了事前道德风险的证据,这表明有自我出资补充健康保险的人与工作场所为其额外保险提供资金的人之间存在明显的行为差异。我们没有发现任何证据表明这两种保险形式与改善自我评估健康有关。