Suppr超能文献

移动医疗干预对改善 1 型糖尿病患者血糖稳定性和生活质量的影响:荟萃分析。

Effects of mobile health interventions on improving glycemic stability and quality of life in patients with type 1 diabetes: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Nursing, Cathy General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 2021 Feb;44(1):187-200. doi: 10.1002/nur.22094. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to examine the effects of mobile-health-based (mHealth) interventions on improving glycemic stability and quality of life (QOL) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Various databases, including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, Chinese Electronic Periodical Services, and China Knowledge Resource Integrated, were used to search for relevant articles. A fixed-effects model or random-effects model was used to examine the overall effect. Various methods, including Egger's test, Begg's test, and trim-and-fill, were adopted to examine publication bias. In total, 26 studies were recruited. Results of the random-effects model showed that the use of mHealth-based interventions significantly decreased glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (mean difference = -0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.53 to -0.22, p < .001), and improved life satisfaction (Hedges' g = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.50, p = .003), worry of diabetes (Hedges' g = -0.25, 95% CI = -0.41 to 0.08, p = .004), and mental health (Hedges' g = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.64, p = .012). Both adults and youths with T1D can benefit from mHealth-based interventions to improve HbA1c (Hedges' g = -0.44, p = .002 vs. -0.30, p = .003). The effect of mHealth-based interventions on improving QOL in both adults and youths could not be examined due to only one study published in adults with T1D. Moreover, those studies that included the function of feedback from professionals showed a significant effect of decreasing HbA1c compared to those without that function (Hedges' g = -0.48 vs. -0.16, p = .019). Mobile devices are convenient, instantaneous, and easy to use to communicate. Applying mHealth-based interventions with the function of feedback from professionals can be considered an alternative healthcare service to achieve optimal glycemic stability in adults and youths with T1D.

摘要

本荟萃分析旨在探讨基于移动医疗(mHealth)的干预措施对改善 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者血糖稳定性和生活质量(QOL)的影响。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、ProQuest、中国电子期刊服务和中国知识资源综合等多个数据库,以寻找相关文章。采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型来检验总体效应。采用 Egger 检验、Begg 检验和修剪填充法等多种方法来检验发表偏倚。共纳入 26 项研究。随机效应模型的结果显示,使用基于 mHealth 的干预措施可显著降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(均数差=-0.37,95%置信区间(CI)=-0.53 至-0.22,p<.001),并改善生活满意度(Hedges'g=0.30,95%CI=0.10 至 0.50,p=.003)、糖尿病担忧(Hedges'g=-0.25,95%CI=-0.41 至 0.08,p=.004)和心理健康(Hedges'g=0.36,95%CI=0.08 至 0.64,p=.012)。T1D 患者中,成年人和青少年都可以从基于 mHealth 的干预措施中获益,以改善 HbA1c(Hedges'g=-0.44,p=.002 与 -0.30,p=.003)。由于仅有一项研究在成年人 T1D 患者中发表,因此无法检验基于 mHealth 的干预措施对成年人和青少年 QOL 改善的影响。此外,那些包含专业人员反馈功能的研究与不具备该功能的研究相比,HbA1c 的降低效果更显著(Hedges'g=-0.48 与 -0.16,p=.019)。移动设备方便、即时、易于使用,可用于沟通。考虑到将基于 mHealth 的干预措施与专业人员反馈功能相结合,可为实现 T1D 成年人和青少年血糖稳定的最佳控制提供一种替代的医疗保健服务。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验