Department of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):270-278. doi: 10.1111/jce.14853. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
Left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) isolation may be performed as an additional atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation strategy based on pulmonary vein isolation. A modified posterior-inferior line (MPL) was proposed for reducing esophageal injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical characteristics of the MPL, compared with the conventional posterior line (CPL).
Multidetector computed tomography was performed in 102 consecutive AF patients (male/female = 60/42) preoperative, and the parameters were evaluated as follows: the distance from MPL and CPL to the esophagus, fat pad presence and thickness in the course of MPL and CPL, and the esophageal route below CPL. The average distance from the MPL to the esophagus was longer than from CPL to the esophagus (3.7 ± 1.5 vs. 1.7 ± 0.4 mm, p < .001). Proportion of fat pad was higher in the course of MPL than CPL. The myocardium tissue and fat pad under MPL was thicker than under CPL (2.9 ± 1.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.3 mm, p < .001; 1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 0.9 ± 0.2 mm, p < .001), respectively. In patients whose esophagus was unconfined in a triangular space at the left inferior pulmonary vein level, the average distance from MPL to esophagus was longer than the confined patients (4.0 ± 1.7 vs. 3.2 ± 1.0 mm, p = .001).
The MPL was far away from the esophagus with thicker myocardium tissue and more fat pad than the CPL; thus, MPL could serve as a favorable alternative in linear ablation for LAPW isolation.
基于肺静脉隔离,左心房后壁(LAPW)隔离可能作为一种额外的房颤(AF)消融策略。提出了改良后的后下线路(MPL)以减少食管损伤。本研究旨在评估 MPL 的解剖学特征,并与传统的后线路(CPL)进行比较。
102 例连续的房颤患者(男/女=60/42)在术前进行了多排 CT 检查,并评估了以下参数:MPL 和 CPL 到食管的距离、MPL 和 CPL 路径中脂肪垫的存在和厚度、CPL 下方的食管路径。MPL 到食管的平均距离长于 CPL 到食管的距离(3.7±1.5 与 1.7±0.4mm,p<0.001)。MPL 路径中的脂肪垫比例高于 CPL。MPL 下的心肌组织和脂肪垫比 CPL 下的厚(2.9±1.1 与 1.6±0.3mm,p<0.001;1.4±0.6 与 0.9±0.2mm,p<0.001)。在左下肺静脉水平的三角形空间内食管不受限制的患者中,MPL 到食管的平均距离长于受限制的患者(4.0±1.7 与 3.2±1.0mm,p=0.001)。
MPL 远离食管,与 CPL 相比,MPL 有更厚的心肌组织和更多的脂肪垫;因此,MPL 可以作为 LAPW 隔离线性消融的一种有利选择。