• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多节段颈椎间盘置换术后旋转中心移位程度不同对临床结果预测的差异。

The discrepant clinical outcome predictions according to the differentiated centre of rotation shift after multilevel cervical total disc replacement.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Namdarun Rehabilitation Clinic, Yong In, Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Medical Centre, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2024 Feb;38(1):23-28. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1866162. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1080/02688697.2020.1866162
PMID:33369503
Abstract

PURPOSE

Cervical total disc replacement (TDR) aims to maintain normal cervical kinematics after surgery. This study investigates the relation between shifted location of centre of rotation (COR) and subsequent surgical outcomes after multilevel cervical TDR (MCTDR) and identifies radiological parameter that corresponded to this change of COR after MCTDR.

METHODS

The study included a consecutive 24 patients treated with MCTDR following the diagnosis of multilevel cervical disc herniation or stenosis. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), range of motion (ROM) at both C2-7 segment and TDR implanted levels, and location of COR at TDR level were evaluated at pre- and post-MCTDR. These parameters were compared between patients who experienced successful and unsuccessful pain relief.

RESULTS

The inherent CORs relatively at ventro-cranial coordinates have demonstrated significant migrations to dorso-caudal location, more prominent shifts for the successful group, after MCTDR switch. The unsuccessful group showed markedly reduced C2-7 ROM and reduced angular improvement at C2-7 as well as MCTDR level in comparison with the successful group. Postoperative C2-7 ROM was related to postoperative COR along the X axis.

CONCLUSION

The determinant for clinical success after MCTDR, other than mere preservation of the ROM both at C2-7 and TDR levels, was restoration of COR from ventro-cranial location close to normal coordinates by posterior and inferior shifts. The position of COR along the X axis after MCTDR was important factor to determine maintenance of C2-7 ROM.

摘要

目的

颈椎间盘置换术(TDR)旨在术后维持颈椎正常运动学。本研究探讨了多节段颈椎 TDR(MCTDR)后旋转中心(COR)位置改变与随后手术结果的关系,并确定了与 MCTDR 后 COR 改变相对应的影像学参数。

方法

本研究纳入了 24 例连续诊断为多节段颈椎间盘突出或狭窄的患者,采用 MCTDR 治疗。在 MCTDR 前后,评估患者的数字评分量表(NRS)、C2-7 节段和 TDR 植入节段的活动范围(ROM)以及 TDR 节段的 COR 位置。比较两组患者的 COR 位置和手术效果。

结果

COR 相对头侧坐标的固有 COR 显示出明显的向尾侧迁移,MCTDR 转换后成功组的迁移更为明显。与成功组相比,不成功组的 C2-7 ROM 明显减少,C2-7 和 MCTDR 节段的角度改善减少。术后 C2-7 ROM 与术后 COR 沿 X 轴有关。

结论

除了在 C2-7 和 TDR 节段保持 ROM 之外,MCTDR 后临床成功的决定因素是通过向后和向下移位,将 COR 从接近正常坐标的头侧位置恢复到正常位置。MCTDR 后 COR 沿 X 轴的位置是维持 C2-7 ROM 的重要因素。

相似文献

1
The discrepant clinical outcome predictions according to the differentiated centre of rotation shift after multilevel cervical total disc replacement.多节段颈椎间盘置换术后旋转中心移位程度不同对临床结果预测的差异。
Br J Neurosurg. 2024 Feb;38(1):23-28. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1866162. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
2
The Feasibility of Optimal Surgical Result Prediction according to the Center of Rotation Shift after Multilevel Cervical Total Disc Replacement.根据多节段颈椎全椎间盘置换术后旋转中心移位预测最佳手术结果的可行性
Asian Spine J. 2020 Aug;14(4):445-452. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0185. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
3
Clinical and Radiologic Findings After Multilevel Cervical Total Disk Replacement: Defining Radiologic Changes to Predict Surgical Outcomes.多节段颈椎全椎间盘置换术后的临床和影像学表现:确定预测手术结果的影像学变化
World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;100:273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
4
Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.颈椎间盘置换和前路融合术后的索引和相邻节段运动学:体内定量放射学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 20;36(9):721-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df10fc.
5
Location change of center of rotation after single-level cervical total disc replacement with ProDisc-C.使用ProDisc-C进行单节段颈椎全椎间盘置换术后旋转中心的位置变化
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(3):339-45. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2016.15.0182.
6
The effect of deviated center of rotation on flexion-extension range of motion after single-level cervical arthroplasty: an in vivo study.旋转中心偏移对单节段颈椎置换术后屈伸活动度的影响:一项体内研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 15;39(26 Spec No.):B12-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000634.
7
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.与融合术相比,Discover人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学及影像学变化。
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
8
In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后颈椎运动学的体内分析。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):747-58. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2583-6. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
9
Comparison of Different Hybrid Techniques for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease-Analysis of Prospectively Collected Clinical, Radiologic, and Psychological Parameters.不同混合技术治疗多节段颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病的比较——对前瞻性收集的临床、放射学和心理学参数的分析
World Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;140:e112-e120. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.182. Epub 2020 May 1.
10
Influence of the deviated center of rotation on the range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty -an in vivo study with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.颈椎间盘置换术后旋转中心偏位对活动范围的影响——一项最少 10 年随访的体内研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 1;24(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06041-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical risk factors associated with cage migration after posterior approaches for lumbar interbody fusion: a 10-year systematic review and meta-analysis.腰椎椎间融合术后后路手术相关的椎间融合器移位临床危险因素:一项10年的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09109-z.
2
Clinical Effectiveness of Artificial Disc Replacement in Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Patients With Cervical Myelopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.人工椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Neurospine. 2023 Sep;20(3):1047-1060. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346498.249. Epub 2023 Sep 30.