• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎间盘置换术后旋转中心偏位对活动范围的影响——一项最少 10 年随访的体内研究。

Influence of the deviated center of rotation on the range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty -an in vivo study with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, No. 31, Xinjiekou East St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 1;24(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06041-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-022-06041-x
PMID:36726119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9890835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Short-term researches have studied the change of the center of rotation (COR) after the Bryan Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). But there is a lack of long-term studies focusing on the location of COR and its influence after surgery.

METHODS

Clinical and radiographic materials of patients who received CDA were retrospectively reviewed. Written informed consents were obtained. Clinical outcome was accessed by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Odom's scale. Radiographic evaluation underwent before surgery, at early (3 months) follow-up and final (minimal 10 years) follow-up. The ROM of the global cervical spine and index level, the functional spine unit (FSU) angle and C2-C7 angle were measured. COR was identified and its coordinates were calculated. The absolute change of COR-x and COR-y were compared in subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included, with an average age of 55.9 ± 8.1 years old. The mean duration of follow up was 135.1 ± 16.1 (120-155) months. JOA, NDI and Odom's scale showed significant improvements at 10 years after surgery. The COR of index level was located in the posterior superior half of the caudal vertebral body. Following the implant of Bryan Disc, the COR shifted forward and downward. During the 10-year follow-up, the location of COR remained stable. ROM at the index level decreased from 10.6 ± 4.0° preoperatively to 9.3 ± 4.0° at the early follow-up (p = 0.03). The ROM at the index level remained unchanged from early follow-up to the final follow-up (9.3 ± 4.0° vs 9.5 ± 5.2°, p = 0.80). In subgroup analysis, larger changes of both COR-x and COR-y were related with decreased ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study illustrated that Bryan CDA could achieved favorable clinical and radiographic outcome over a minimal 10-year follow-up. The reduction of the flexion-extension ROM may be correlated with a more deviated postoperative COR. More attention should be paid to preoperative design and intraoperative technique to obtain a more native COR.

摘要

背景

短期研究已经研究了 Bryan 颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)后旋转中心(COR)的变化。但缺乏长期研究来关注手术后 COR 的位置及其影响。

方法

回顾性分析接受 CDA 的患者的临床和影像学资料。获得书面知情同意。临床结果通过日本矫形协会(JOA)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和 Odom 量表进行评估。在术前、早期(3 个月)随访和最终(至少 10 年)随访时进行影像学评估。测量全颈椎的 ROM 和指数水平、功能脊柱单位(FSU)角和 C2-C7 角。确定 COR 并计算其坐标。在亚组分析中比较 COR-x 和 COR-y 的绝对变化。

结果

共纳入 60 例患者,平均年龄 55.9±8.1 岁。平均随访时间为 135.1±16.1(120-155)个月。术后 10 年,JOA、NDI 和 Odom 量表均有显著改善。指数水平的 COR 位于下位椎体的后上半部分。Bryan Disc 植入后,COR 向前向下移位。在 10 年随访期间,COR 的位置保持稳定。指数水平的 ROM 从术前的 10.6±4.0°减少到早期随访时的 9.3±4.0°(p=0.03)。从早期随访到最终随访,指数水平的 ROM 保持不变(9.3±4.0°比 9.5±5.2°,p=0.80)。在亚组分析中,COR-x 和 COR-y 的较大变化与 ROM 的减少有关。

结论

本研究表明,Bryan CDA 在至少 10 年的随访中可获得良好的临床和影像学结果。屈伸 ROM 的减少可能与术后 COR 更偏有关。应更加注意术前设计和术中技术,以获得更接近自然的 COR。

相似文献

1
Influence of the deviated center of rotation on the range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty -an in vivo study with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.颈椎间盘置换术后旋转中心偏位对活动范围的影响——一项最少 10 年随访的体内研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 1;24(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-06041-x.
2
Changes in the centre of rotation and the anterior bone loss of the vertebral body in Mobi-C artificial disc replacement segments after cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.颈椎杂交手术后 Mobi-C 人工椎间盘置换节段旋转中心和椎体前缘骨丢失的变化:一项回顾性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1265-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08047-y. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Five-Year Trends in Center of Rotation After Single-Level Cervical Arthroplasty with the Prestige-LP Disc.单节段颈椎置换术后旋转中心五年变化:Prestige-LP 椎间盘系统
World Neurosurg. 2019 Dec;132:e941-e948. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.042. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
4
Mid-long-term follow-up of operated level kinematics after single-level artificial cervical disc replacement with Bryan disc.Bryan 人工颈椎间盘置换术后单节段颈椎运动节段的中远期随访研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 9;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03051-2.
5
[LOCATION CHANGE OF ROTATION CENTER AFTER SINGLE SEGMENTAL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT WITH ProDisc-C].[使用ProDisc-C进行单节段颈椎间盘置换术后旋转中心的位置变化]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;29(1):48-53.
6
Location change of center of rotation after single-level cervical total disc replacement with ProDisc-C.使用ProDisc-C进行单节段颈椎全椎间盘置换术后旋转中心的位置变化
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(3):339-45. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2016.15.0182.
7
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Noncontiguous Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: Results of Mid- to Long-Term Follow-up.颈椎间盘置换术治疗非连续型颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病:中期至长期随访结果。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):2901-2910. doi: 10.1111/os.13900. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
8
Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis.Bryan 颈椎间盘假体单节段植入后颈椎的长期运动学分析。
Spine J. 2013 Jun;13(6):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.046. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
9
In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后颈椎运动学的体内分析。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):747-58. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2583-6. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
10
The effect of deviated center of rotation on flexion-extension range of motion after single-level cervical arthroplasty: an in vivo study.旋转中心偏移对单节段颈椎置换术后屈伸活动度的影响:一项体内研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Dec 15;39(26 Spec No.):B12-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000634.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of the deviated center of rotation on facet joint degeneration after cervical disc replacement - an in vivo study with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.颈椎间盘置换术后旋转中心偏位对小关节退变的影响:一项至少 10 年随访的前瞻性研究
BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 4;24(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02615-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comparison of National Trends and Outcomes.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术的比较:国家趋势和结果的比较。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Apr;160:e96-e110. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.099. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
2
Hybrid surgery: a comparison of early postoperative outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty.杂交手术:前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术的早期术后结果比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Oct 29;36(4):575-584. doi: 10.3171/2021.7.SPINE21478. Print 2022 Apr 1.
3
Comparison of adverse events between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a 10-year follow-up.
颈椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术不良事件的比较:10 年随访。
Spine J. 2021 Feb;21(2):253-264. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.013. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
4
Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty-Long-Term Evidence Update.两级前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术——长期证据更新
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S36-S40. doi: 10.14444/7089.
5
Employment Status for the First Decade Following Randomization to Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Fusion.随机分组接受颈椎间盘置换与融合术后的头 10 年的就业状况。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Oct 15;45(20):1411-1418. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003565.
6
Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc degenerative diseases on the basis of more than 60 months of follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于超过 60 个月随访的颈椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗颈椎间盘退行性疾病的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Apr 20;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01717-0.
7
Comparison of 10-year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy.脊髓病和神经根病患者行 Bryan 颈椎间盘置换术 10 年疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(6):1127-1134. doi: 10.1111/os.12565. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
8
10-year follow-up after implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.Bryan颈椎间盘假体植入术后10年随访。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1191-1198. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4897-2. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
9
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)治疗两节段颈椎间盘退变疾病的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
10
An Updated Meta-Analysis Comparing Artificial Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease (CDDD).一项比较人工颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病(CDDD)的更新荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Dec;40(23):1816-23. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001138.