Suppr超能文献

鼓室内单独使用或静脉内使用地塞米松与挽救性鼓室内类固醇治疗突发性聋后听力恢复的差异:一项随机试验。

Differences in hearing recovery following intratympanic alone or intravenous dexamethasone with rescue intratympanic steroids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, BenQ Medical Center, The affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Ürümqi, China.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 May;46(3):546-551. doi: 10.1111/coa.13706. Epub 2021 Jan 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate hearing improvement at different frequencies and the safety of intratympanic (IT) and intravenous (IV) administration of dexamethasone for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).

METHODS

SSNHL patients were randomly divided into two groups within 72 hours after onset and received 24 days of dexamethasone therapy. Group A received IT dexamethasone once every other day for 24 days. Group B received IV dexamethasone for 12 days, followed by IT dexamethasone once every other day for the following 12 days. Hearing recovery and side effects were compared.

RESULTS

Subgroup analysis was performed to look for variation in hearing improvement in high frequency, low frequency and overall hearing at different time points. There was no evidence of a difference in hearing outcomes between IT dexamethasone and sequential IV plus IT treatments. Side effects of steroids were observed within 90 days after treatment. The local adverse effects of IT injection were mild. The systemic side effects in group B were more serious than those in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

IT dexamethasone was safer than IV dexamethasone, and there was no evidence of a difference in hearing outcomes between IT dexamethasone and sequential IV plus IT treatments. It is necessary to make individualised treatment decisions according to the patient's condition.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估不同频率的听力改善情况,并评估鼓室内(IT)和静脉内(IV)给予地塞米松治疗突发性聋(SSNHL)的安全性。

方法

发病后 72 小时内将 SSNHL 患者随机分为两组,并接受 24 天的地塞米松治疗。A 组每 2 天接受一次 IT 地塞米松治疗,共 24 天。B 组接受 12 天的 IV 地塞米松治疗,然后再接受 IT 地塞米松治疗,每 2 天一次,持续 12 天。比较听力恢复和副作用。

结果

进行了亚组分析,以寻找不同时间点高频、低频和总体听力改善的变化。在听力结果方面,IT 地塞米松与序贯 IV 加 IT 治疗之间没有差异的证据。治疗后 90 天内观察到类固醇的副作用。IT 注射的局部不良反应较轻。B 组的全身副作用比 A 组更严重。

结论

IT 地塞米松比 IV 地塞米松更安全,在听力结果方面,IT 地塞米松与序贯 IV 加 IT 治疗之间没有差异。根据患者的情况,有必要做出个体化的治疗决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验