• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年心力衰竭患者日常自我护理中的自然决策

Naturalistic Decision Making in Everyday Self-care Among Older Adults With Heart Failure.

作者信息

Daley Carly N, Cornet Victor P, Toscos Tammy R, Bolchini Davide P, Mirro Michael J, Holden Richard J

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022;37(2):167-176. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000778.

DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000778
PMID:33369989
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Every day, older adults living with heart failure make decisions regarding their health that may ultimately affect their disease trajectory. Experts describe these decisions as instances of naturalistic decision making influenced by the surrounding social and physical environment and involving shifting goals, high stakes, and the involvement of others.

OBJECTIVE

This study applied a naturalistic decision-making approach to better understand everyday decision making by older adults with heart failure.

METHODS

We present a cross-sectional qualitative field research study using a naturalistic decision-making conceptual model and critical incident technique to study health-related decision making. The study recruited 24 older adults with heart failure and 14 of their accompanying support persons from an ambulatory cardiology center. Critical incident interviews were performed and qualitatively analyzed to understand in depth how individuals made everyday health-related decisions.

RESULTS

White, male (66.7%), older adults' decision making accorded with a preliminary conceptual model of naturalistic decision making occurring in phases of monitoring, interpreting, and acting, both independently and in sequence, for various decisions. Analyses also uncovered that there are barriers and strategies affecting the performance of these phases, other actors can play important roles, and health decisions are made in the context of personal priorities, values, and emotions.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings lead to an expanded conceptual model of naturalistic decision making by older adults with heart failure. In turn, the model bears implications for future research and the design of interventions grounded in the realities of everyday decision making.

摘要

背景

每天,患有心力衰竭的老年人都会做出有关自身健康的决定,这些决定最终可能会影响他们的疾病发展轨迹。专家们将这些决定描述为自然决策的实例,受到周围社会和物理环境的影响,涉及不断变化的目标、高风险以及他人的参与。

目的

本研究采用自然决策方法,以更好地理解老年心力衰竭患者的日常决策。

方法

我们开展了一项横断面定性实地研究,使用自然决策概念模型和关键事件技术来研究与健康相关的决策。该研究从一个门诊心脏病中心招募了24名老年心力衰竭患者及其14名陪同的支持人员。进行了关键事件访谈并进行定性分析,以深入了解个体如何做出日常与健康相关的决策。

结果

白人男性(66.7%)老年人的决策符合自然决策的初步概念模型,该模型在监测、解释和行动阶段独立且依次发生,用于各种决策。分析还发现,存在影响这些阶段执行的障碍和策略,其他行为者可以发挥重要作用,并且健康决策是在个人优先事项、价值观和情感的背景下做出的。

结论

研究结果导致了老年心力衰竭患者自然决策概念模型的扩展。反过来,该模型对未来的研究以及基于日常决策现实的干预措施设计具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Naturalistic Decision Making in Everyday Self-care Among Older Adults With Heart Failure.老年心力衰竭患者日常自我护理中的自然决策
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022;37(2):167-176. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000778.
2
Qualitative analysis of naturalistic decision making in adults with chronic heart failure.成人慢性心力衰竭患者自然决策的定性分析。
Nurs Res. 2013 Mar-Apr;62(2):91-8. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e318276250c.
3
Patient decision-making personas: An application of a patient-centered cognitive task analysis (P-CTA).患者决策角色:以患者为中心的认知任务分析(P-CTA)的应用。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Sep;87:103107. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103107. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
4
Medication Nonadherence or Self-care? Understanding the Medication Decision-Making Process and Experiences of Older Adults With Heart Failure.药物不依从还是自我护理?了解老年心力衰竭患者的药物决策过程和体验。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):26-34. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000616.
5
Views of Patients With Heart Failure on Their Value-Based Self-care Decisions: A Qualitative Study.心力衰竭患者对基于价值的自我护理决策的看法:一项定性研究。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Nov/Dec;35(6):E89-E98. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000733.
6
How do patients' values influence heart failure self-care decision-making?: A mixed-methods systematic review.患者价值观如何影响心力衰竭自我护理决策?:一项混合方法系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jul;59:89-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
7
Self-care behavior: a new insight of the role of impulsivity into decision making process in persons with heart failure.自我护理行为:冲动性在心力衰竭患者决策过程中作用的新视角。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jul 27;20(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01617-8.
8
How do persons with dementia participate in decision making related to health and daily care? a multi-case study.痴呆症患者如何参与与健康和日常护理相关的决策?一项多案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 7;12:241. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-241.
9
Cognitive influences on self-care decision making in persons with heart failure.认知对心力衰竭患者自我护理决策的影响。
Am Heart J. 2007 Sep;154(3):424-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.058.
10
Decision Making Among Persons Living With Heart Failure.心力衰竭患者的决策制定
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):E1-9. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000312.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility, acceptability, and outcome responsiveness of the SYMPERHEART intervention to support symptom perception in persons with heart failure and their informal caregivers: a feasibility quasi-experimental study.SYMPERHEART干预措施对支持心力衰竭患者及其非正式照护者症状感知的可行性、可接受性和结果反应性:一项可行性准实验研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Oct 4;9(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01390-3.
2
The Situation-Specific Theory of Heart Failure Self-care: An Update on the Problem, Person, and Environmental Factors Influencing Heart Failure Self-care.心力衰竭自我护理的情境特定理论:影响心力衰竭自我护理的问题、个体和环境因素的最新研究。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022;37(6):515-529. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000919. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3
SEIPS 101 and seven simple SEIPS tools.SEIPS 101和七个简单的SEIPS工具。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Nov;30(11):901-910. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012538. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
Human factors and ergonomics methods for pharmacy research and clinical practice.药学研究和临床实践中的人为因素和工效学方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Dec;17(12):2019-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 May 2.