Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Section of Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243826. eCollection 2020.
Recent studies suggest that occupational inhalant exposures trigger exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but findings are conflicting.
We included 7,768 individuals with self-reported asthma (n = 3,215) and/or spirometric airflow limitation (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/ forced expiratory volume (FVC) <0.70) (n = 5,275) who participated in The Copenhagen City Heart Study or The Copenhagen General Population Study from 2001-2016. Occupational exposure was assigned by linking job codes with job exposure matrices, and exacerbations were defined by register data on oral corticosteroid treatment, emergency care unit assessment or hospital admission. Associations between occupational inhalant exposure each year of follow-up and exacerbation were assessed by Cox regression with time varying exposure and age as the underlying time scale.
Participants were followed for a median of 4.6 years (interquartile range, IQR 5.4), during which 870 exacerbations occurred. Exacerbations were not associated with any of the selected exposures (high molecular weight sensitizers, low molecular weight sensitizers, irritants or low and high levels of mineral dust, biological dust, gases & fumes or the composite variable vapours, gases, dusts or fumes). Hazards ratios ranged from 0.8 (95% confidence interval: 0.7;1.0) to 1.2 (95% confidence interval: 0.9;1.7).
Exacerbations of obstructive airway disease were not associated with occupational inhalant exposures assigned by a job exposure matrix. Further studies with alternative exposure assessment are warranted.
最近的研究表明,职业性吸入物暴露会引发哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的恶化,但研究结果存在冲突。
我们纳入了 7768 名自报患有哮喘(n=3215)和/或肺通气功能障碍(第 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)/用力肺活量(FVC)<0.70)(n=5275)的个体,他们参加了 2001 年至 2016 年期间的哥本哈根城市心脏研究或哥本哈根普通人群研究。职业暴露通过将工作代码与工作暴露矩阵相联系来确定,恶化通过登记在册的口服皮质类固醇治疗、急诊评估或住院情况来定义。通过 Cox 回归模型评估每年职业性吸入暴露与恶化之间的关联,其中暴露情况是随时间变化的,年龄是潜在的时间尺度。
参与者的中位随访时间为 4.6 年(四分位距[IQR],5.4),在此期间发生了 870 次恶化事件。恶化与任何选定的暴露因素均无关(高分子量致敏剂、低分子量致敏剂、刺激物或低水平和高水平的矿物粉尘、生物粉尘、气体和烟雾,或蒸气、气体、粉尘或烟雾的复合变量)。风险比范围为 0.8(95%置信区间:0.7;1.0)至 1.2(95%置信区间:0.9;1.7)。
职业性吸入物暴露与阻塞性气道疾病恶化无关,这与工作暴露矩阵分配的结果一致。需要进一步开展采用替代暴露评估方法的研究。