Nong Y, Lin J T, Sun X W, Wang J, Ma X, Liu X P, Wang H Q, Zha R T, Shen D P, Jiang S J, Luo S K, Zhao Q, Meng L, Wang W P, Fang J, Han L M, Lu G B, Zhang W, Li G F, Wang H, Zhao Z Y, Zhou W, Wei B L, Yuan Y D, Peng L P, Lu X L, Pang G F, Li F H, Li L, Zhen H
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Department of Lung Diseases, Mudanjiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Mudanjiang 157009, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 19;101(3):205-211. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201122-03166.
To observe the efficacy and safety of Kangbingdu granules (KBD) in the treatment of influenza. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, and positive-drug parallel control trial was conducted in 27 Grade ⅢA hospitals in China and the subjects were randomly assigned to the KBD test group or the oseltamivir phosphate capsule control group at a ratio of 1∶1. 200 subjects were planned to be enrolled in each group. The experimental group was given KBD (18g each time, 3 times a day) and oseltamivir phosphate simulator orally, while the control group was given oseltamivir phosphate capsule (75 mg each time, twice a day) and KBD simulator orally for 5 days. The primary efficacy indicators included the remission time of major clinical symptoms and the time of complete defervescence. The secondary efficacy indicators included dosage of acetaminophen, the change of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome score and the remission time of other important clinical symptoms. The efficacy of KBD in the test group and Oseltamivir phosphate control group were compared. Adverse events or adverse reactions were observed at the same time to evaluate the safety of KBD Granules. A total of 393 subjects from 27 Grade ⅢA hospitals in China were enrolled. The experimental group included 195 subjects and 191 subjects (97.95%) completed the trial, While the control group included 198 subjects and 195 subjects (98.48%) completed the trial. There was no significant difference in the shedding rate and rejection rate between the two groups (>0.05). In the Full Analysis Set (FAS), the mean age of the experimental group was (34.9±14.4) years old, with 83 males (42.78%). The mean age of the control group was (33.3±13.5) years old, with 78 males (39.59%). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in demographic data, physical examination, viral pathogen detection, total score of TCM syndromes and scores of each symptom at baseline (>0.05). In the FAS, the remission time () of major clinical symptoms was 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) days in the experimental group and 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) days in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (>0.05). The time () of complete defervescence was 34.0 (20.3, 49.0) hours in the experimental group and 36.5 (19.6, 48.8) hours in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (>0.05). KBD granules had the same effect as Oseltamivir phosphate capsule (>0.05) in terms of acetaminophen dosage, TCM syndrome effect and disappearance rate of most important clinical symptoms. Meanwhile, the disappearance rate of dizziness and chest distress on day 3 in the KBD granules group was better than that of oseltamivir phosphate capsule (0.05). KBD granules have the same efficacy as Oseltamivir Phosphate capsule in the treatment of influenza and the drug safety is good.
观察抗病毒颗粒(KBD)治疗流感的疗效及安全性。在中国27家三级甲等医院进行一项多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、阳性药平行对照试验,受试者按1∶1比例随机分为KBD试验组和磷酸奥司他韦胶囊对照组,每组计划入组200例。试验组口服KBD(每次18g,每日3次)及磷酸奥司他韦模拟剂,对照组口服磷酸奥司他韦胶囊(每次75mg,每日2次)及KBD模拟剂,疗程5天。主要疗效指标为主要临床症状缓解时间和完全退热时间,次要疗效指标为对乙酰氨基酚用量、中医证候积分变化及其他重要临床症状缓解时间。比较试验组KBD与磷酸奥司他韦对照组的疗效,同时观察不良事件或不良反应,评价KBD颗粒的安全性。中国27家三级甲等医院共入组393例受试者,试验组195例,191例(97.95%)完成试验;对照组198例,195例(98.48%)完成试验。两组脱落率及剔除率差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。在全分析集(FAS)中,试验组平均年龄(34.9±14.4)岁,男性83例(42.78%);对照组平均年龄(33.3±13.5)岁,男性78例(39.59%)。两组基线时人口学资料、体格检查、病毒病原体检测、中医证候总分及各症状积分比较,差异均无统计学意义(>0.05)。在FAS中,试验组主要临床症状缓解时间()为3.0(3.0,4.0)天,对照组为3.0(3.0,4.0)天,差异无统计学意义(>0.05);试验组完全退热时间()为34.0(20.3,49.0)小时,对照组为36.5(19.6,48.8)小时,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。KBD颗粒在对乙酰氨基酚用量、中医证候疗效及主要临床症状消失率方面与磷酸奥司他韦胶囊效果相当(>0.05)。同时,KBD颗粒组第3天头晕、胸闷消失率优于磷酸奥司他韦胶囊组(0.05)。KBD颗粒治疗流感疗效与磷酸奥司他韦胶囊相当,且药物安全性良好。